Literature DB >> 28484966

The Role of Simple Semantics in the Process of Artificial Grammar Learning.

Birgit Öttl1, Gerhard Jäger2, Barbara Kaup3.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of semantic information on artificial grammar learning (AGL). Recursive grammars of different complexity levels (regular language, mirror language, copy language) were investigated in a series of AGL experiments. In the with-semantics condition, participants acquired semantic information prior to the AGL experiment; in the without-semantics control condition, participants did not receive semantic information. It was hypothesized that semantics would generally facilitate grammar acquisition and that the learning benefit in the with-semantics conditions would increase with increasing grammar complexity. Experiment 1 showed learning effects for all grammars but no performance difference between conditions. Experiment 2 replicated the absence of a semantic benefit for all grammars even though semantic information was more prominent during grammar acquisition as compared to Experiment 1. Thus, we did not find evidence for the idea that semantics facilitates grammar acquisition, which seems to support the view of an independent syntactic processing component.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chomsky Hierarchy; Grammar acquisition; Semantics–syntax interplay

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28484966     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-017-9494-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  22 in total

1.  Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Implicit acquisition of grammars with crossed and nested non-adjacent dependencies: investigating the push-down stack model.

Authors:  Julia Uddén; Martin Ingvar; Peter Hagoort; Karl M Petersson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-03-27

3.  How semantic biases in simple adjacencies affect learning a complex structure with non-adjacencies in AGL: a statistical account.

Authors:  Fenna H Poletiek; Jun Lai
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates?

Authors:  Pierre Perruchet; Arnaud Rey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

5.  The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: functional localization and structural connectivity.

Authors:  Angela D Friederici; Jörg Bahlmann; Stefan Heim; Ricarda I Schubotz; Alfred Anwander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Kimberly M Fenn; Daniel Margoliash; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Syntax gradually segregates from semantics in the developing brain.

Authors:  Michael A Skeide; Jens Brauer; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species.

Authors:  Caroline A A van Heijningen; Jos de Visser; Willem Zuidema; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Learning simple and complex artificial grammars in the presence of a semantic reference field: effects on performance and awareness.

Authors:  Esther Van den Bos; Fenna H Poletiek
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.