Literature DB >> 28484914

Further evidence on EQ-5D-5L preference inversion: a Brazil/U.S. collaboration.

Benjamin M Craig1, Andréa L Monteiro2, Michael Herdman3, Marisa Santos4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A preference inversion occurs when "worse" health (instead of "better" health) along a scale or score is preferred. Our aim was to confirm past findings of EQ-5D-5L preference inversions among English-speaking respondents and to explore inversions among Portuguese-speaking respondents. Anecdotal evidence suggests that inversions may be more common in the Portuguese version, where the translation of the fourth level "severely" (gravemente) means "gravely."
METHODS: Through an infusion clinic in Tampa, Florida, United States and a cardiology clinic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 740 respondents completed a tablet-based survey, which included the EQ-5D-3L and -5L followed by paired comparisons designed to assess preference inversions between the fourth and fifth levels of each of the five domains: Mobility (MO), Self-Care (SC), Usual Activity (UA), Pain/Discomfort (PD), and Anxiety/Depression (AD). An example from the AD dimension would be: "Which do you prefer? Starting today, 30 days with health problems: Severely anxious or depressed or Extremely anxious or depressed" (i.e., Level 4 AD vs. Level 5 AD).
RESULTS: In the English-speaking respondents, preference inversion was only observed to a substantial extent in the AD dimension (U.S. N = 470; 7% MO, 14% SC, 14% UA, 20% PD, and 45% AD). Inversions were more common among the Portuguese-speaking respondents (Brazil N = 270; 11% MO, 32% SC, 35% UA, 49% PD, and 65% AD). Specifically, 44 out of 68 Brazilian respondents (65%) preferred "extremamente" (Level 5 AD) over "gravemente ansioso (a) ou deprimido (a)" (Level 4 AD).
CONCLUSIONS: This evidence confirms previous findings for the U.S. English version of the EQ-5D-5L and led to a relabeling on the Portuguese version. It demonstrates the usefulness of collaboration between psychometric, econometric, and linguistic experts in developing the wording for and translating preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Further research may explore inversions in other translations. The authors recommend that preference inversion tests should be included in the development and translation process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EQ-5D; Health preferences; Item response; Psychometrics; QALY; Scales

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28484914     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1591-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  11 in total

1.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12.

Authors:  John E Brazier; Jennifer Roberts
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The valuation of the EQ-5D in Portugal.

Authors:  Lara N Ferreira; Pedro L Ferreira; Luis N Pereira; Mark Oppe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  What matters most? Evidence-based findings of health dimensions affecting the societal preferences for EQ-5D health states.

Authors:  Monica Viegas Andrade; Kenya Valeria Micaela de Souza Noronha; Ana Carolina Maia; Paul Kind
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.632

5.  From translation to version management: a history and review of methods for the cultural adaptation of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire.

Authors:  Rosalind Rabin; Claire Gudex; Caroline Selai; Michael Herdman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Health-related quality of life may improve after transplantation in pancreas-kidney recipients.

Authors:  La Salete Martins; Cristina Outerelo; Jorge Malheiro; Isabel M Fonseca; António C Henriques; Leonídio S Dias; Anabela S Rodrigues; António M Cabrita; Irene L Noronha
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation.

Authors:  Diane Wild; Alyson Grove; Mona Martin; Sonya Eremenco; Sandra McElroy; Aneesa Verjee-Lorenz; Pennifer Erikson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  Do health preferences contradict ordering of EQ-5D labels?

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; A Simon Pickard; Kim Rand-Hendriksen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study.

Authors:  M F Janssen; A Simon Pickard; Dominik Golicki; Claire Gudex; Maciej Niewada; Luciana Scalone; Paul Swinburn; Jan Busschbach
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).

Authors:  M Herdman; C Gudex; A Lloyd; Mf Janssen; P Kind; D Parkin; G Bonsel; X Badia
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  5 in total

1.  Valuing EQ-5D-5L health states 'in context' using a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Amanda Cole; Koonal Shah; Brendan Mulhern; Yan Feng; Nancy Devlin
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-05-31

2.  Conceptual Framework for Optimised Proxy Value Set Selection Through Supra-National Value Set Development for the EQ-5D Instruments.

Authors:  Agata Łaszewska; Ayesha Sajjad; Jan Busschbach; Judit Simon; Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.558

3.  Effects of combining manual therapy, neck muscle exercises, and therapeutic pain neuroscience education in patients with migraine: a study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gabriella de Almeida Tolentino; Lidiane Lima Florencio; Carina Ferreira Pinheiro; Fabíola Dach; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.474

4.  Preference Paths and Their Kaizen Tasks for Small Samples.

Authors:  Benjamin Matthew Craig; Kim Rand; John D Hartman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  A New Approach to Assessing Children's Interpretation of Severity Qualifiers in a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument-The EQ-5D-Y-5L: Development and Testing.

Authors:  Sarah Derrett; Mike Herdman; Lucky G Ngwira; Elizabeth Yohe Moore; Jennifer Jelsma
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.883

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.