| Literature DB >> 28483891 |
Kyle Eggleton1, Winston Liaw2, Andrew Bazemore2.
Abstract
As the United States enters a new era of value-based payment heavy in emphasis on primary care measurement, careful examination of selected measures and their potential impact on outcomes and vulnerable populations is essential. Applying a theoretical model of health care quality as a coding matrix, we used a directed content analysis approach to categorize individual Merit Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) measures. We found that most MIPS measures related to aspects of clinical effectiveness, whereas few, if any, related to aspects of access, patient experience, or interpersonal care. These gaps suggest that MIPS may fail to measure the broader aspects of health care quality and even risk worsening existing disparities.Entities:
Keywords: incentive; pay for performance; quality of health care; reimbursement
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28483891 PMCID: PMC5422087 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Fam Med ISSN: 1544-1709 Impact factor: 5.166