Literature DB >> 28483891

Impact of Gaps in Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Measures on Marginalized Populations.

Kyle Eggleton1, Winston Liaw2, Andrew Bazemore2.   

Abstract

As the United States enters a new era of value-based payment heavy in emphasis on primary care measurement, careful examination of selected measures and their potential impact on outcomes and vulnerable populations is essential. Applying a theoretical model of health care quality as a coding matrix, we used a directed content analysis approach to categorize individual Merit Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) measures. We found that most MIPS measures related to aspects of clinical effectiveness, whereas few, if any, related to aspects of access, patient experience, or interpersonal care. These gaps suggest that MIPS may fail to measure the broader aspects of health care quality and even risk worsening existing disparities.
© 2017 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  incentive; pay for performance; quality of health care; reimbursement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28483891      PMCID: PMC5422087          DOI: 10.1370/afm.2075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  8 in total

1.  Defining quality of care.

Authors:  S M Campbell; M O Roland; S A Buetow
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  New paradigms for quality in primary care.

Authors:  B Starfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  The seven pillars of quality.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 4.  Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials.

Authors:  Simon J Griffin; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Marijcke W M Veltman; Susan Gillard; Julie Grant; Moira Stewart
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 5.  What is the empirical basis for paying for quality in health care?

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Richard G Frank
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Will pay-for-performance and quality reporting affect health care disparities?

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; Arthur Elster; Andy Eisenberg; Evelyn Lewis; John Montgomery; Diana Ramos
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Patient centeredness, cultural competence and healthcare quality.

Authors:  Somnath Saha; Mary Catherine Beach; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Closing the health equity gap: evidence-based strategies for primary health care organizations.

Authors:  Annette J Browne; Colleen M Varcoe; Sabrina T Wong; Victoria L Smye; Josée Lavoie; Doreen Littlejohn; David Tu; Olive Godwin; Murry Krause; Koushambhi B Khan; Alycia Fridkin; Patricia Rodney; John O'Neil; Scott Lennox
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2012-10-13
  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  An Electronic Medical Record-Derived Individualized Performance Metric to Measure Risk-Adjusted Adherence with Perioperative Prophylactic Bundles for Health Care Disparity Research and Implementation Science.

Authors:  Michael H Andreae; Stephan R Maman; Abrahm J Behnam
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 2.  Society of General Internal Medicine Position Statement on Social Risk and Equity in Medicare's Mandatory Value-Based Payment Programs.

Authors:  Anders Chen; Arnab Ghosh; Kendrick B Gwynn; Celeste Newby; Tracey L Henry; Jackson Pearce; Marshall Fleurant; Stacie Schmidt; Jennifer Bracey; Elizabeth A Jacobs
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  How Did Orthopaedic Surgeons Perform in the 2018 Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System?

Authors:  Thomas B Cwalina; Tarun K Jella; Alexander J Acuña; Linsen T Samuel; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Primary care clinicians' perspectives about quality measurements in safety-net clinics and non-safety-net clinics.

Authors:  Kathleen A Culhane-Pera; Luis Martin Ortega; Mai See Thao; Shannon L Pergament; Andrew M Pattock; Lynne S Ogawa; Michael Scandrett; David J Satin
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-11-07

5.  High Rates Of Partial Participation In The First Year Of The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System.

Authors:  Nate C Apathy; Jordan Everson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The Merit-based Incentive Payment System: Pearson's Chi-Square and Categorical Dependent Variable Models Analyzed for Domains-Effective Clinical Care and Efficiency/Cost Reduction.

Authors:  Amrita Shenoy
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-12-06

7.  High and Sustained Participation in a Multi-year Voluntary Performance Measurement Initiative Among Primary Care Teams.

Authors:  Carol Mulder; Jennifer Rayner
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2022-04-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.