Ronit Confino-Cohen1, Yossi Rosman2, Keren Meir-Shafrir3, Tali Stauber1, Idit Lachover-Roth1, Alon Hershko1, Arnon Goldberg1. 1. Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Meir General Hospital, Kfar-Saba, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. 2. Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Meir General Hospital, Kfar-Saba, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: yossi.rosman@clalit.org.il. 3. Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Meir General Hospital, Kfar-Saba, Israel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Penicillins are the drug family most commonly associated with hypersensitivity reactions. Current guidelines recommend negative skin tests (ST) before re-administering penicillins to patients with previous nonimmediate reactions (NIR). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine whether ST are necessary before re-administering penicillin to patients with NIR. METHODS: Patients with NIR to penicillins starting longer than 1 hour after last dose administration or starting any time after the first treatment day or patients with vague recollection of their reaction underwent penicillin ST. Disregarding ST results, patients were challenged with the relevant penicillins. One-tenth of the therapeutic dose followed by the full dose was administered at 1-hour interval and patients continued taking the full dose for 5 days. RESULTS: A total of 710 patients with alleged BL allergy were evaluated. Patients with a history of immediate reaction (52, 7.3%) or cephalosporin allergy (16, 2.2%) were excluded. Of the remaining 642 patients, 62.3% had negative ST, 5.3% positive ST, and 32.4% equivocal ST. A total of 617 (96.1%) patients were challenged. Immediate reaction was observed in 9 patients (1.5%): 1-positive ST, 7-negative ST, and 1-equivocal ST (P = .7). Late reaction to the first-day challenge occurred in 24 patients (4%). An at-home challenge was continued by 491 patients. Complete 5-day and partial challenges were well tolerated by 417 (85%) and 44 patients (8.9%), respectively, disregarding ST results. Thirty patients (6.1%) developed mild reactions to the home challenge regardless of their ST results. CONCLUSION: A 5-day oral challenge without preceding ST is safe and sufficient to exclude penicillin allergy after NIR developing during penicillin treatment.
BACKGROUND:Penicillins are the drug family most commonly associated with hypersensitivity reactions. Current guidelines recommend negative skin tests (ST) before re-administering penicillins to patients with previous nonimmediate reactions (NIR). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine whether ST are necessary before re-administering penicillin to patients with NIR. METHODS:Patients with NIR to penicillins starting longer than 1 hour after last dose administration or starting any time after the first treatment day or patients with vague recollection of their reaction underwent penicillin ST. Disregarding ST results, patients were challenged with the relevant penicillins. One-tenth of the therapeutic dose followed by the full dose was administered at 1-hour interval and patients continued taking the full dose for 5 days. RESULTS: A total of 710 patients with alleged BL allergy were evaluated. Patients with a history of immediate reaction (52, 7.3%) or cephalosporinallergy (16, 2.2%) were excluded. Of the remaining 642 patients, 62.3% had negative ST, 5.3% positive ST, and 32.4% equivocal ST. A total of 617 (96.1%) patients were challenged. Immediate reaction was observed in 9 patients (1.5%): 1-positive ST, 7-negative ST, and 1-equivocal ST (P = .7). Late reaction to the first-day challenge occurred in 24 patients (4%). An at-home challenge was continued by 491 patients. Complete 5-day and partial challenges were well tolerated by 417 (85%) and 44 patients (8.9%), respectively, disregarding ST results. Thirty patients (6.1%) developed mild reactions to the home challenge regardless of their ST results. CONCLUSION: A 5-day oral challenge without preceding ST is safe and sufficient to exclude penicillinallergy after NIR developing during penicillin treatment.
Authors: Jason A Trubiano; Cosby A Stone; M Lindsay Grayson; Karen Urbancic; Monica A Slavin; Karin A Thursky; Elizabeth J Phillips Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2017-08-23
Authors: Rashmeet Bhogal; Abid Hussain; Ariyur Balaji; William H Bermingham; John F Marriott; Mamidipudi T Krishna Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2021-01-13
Authors: Cosby A Stone; Jason Trubiano; David T Coleman; Christine R F Rukasin; Elizabeth J Phillips Journal: Allergy Date: 2019-05-26 Impact factor: 13.146
Authors: Jason A Trubiano; M Lindsay Grayson; Karin A Thursky; Elizabeth J Phillips; Monica A Slavin Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Kyra Y L Chua; Sara Vogrin; Susan Bury; Abby Douglas; Natasha E Holmes; Nixon Tan; Natasha K Brusco; Rebecca Hall; Belinda Lambros; Jacinta Lean; Wendy Stevenson; Misha Devchand; Kent Garrett; Karin Thursky; M Lindsay Grayson; Monica A Slavin; Elizabeth J Phillips; Jason A Trubiano Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 9.079