J R D McIntosh1, S Jay2, N Hadden2, P J Whittaker2. 1. University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Electronic address: jerome.mcintosh@student.manchester.ac.uk. 2. University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to review the current literature to assess the effectiveness of E-health interventions in increasing physical activity (PA) in young people. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: A search of the literature databases Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library using key words 'Adolescents'; 'Young people'; 'Students'; 'Young Adults'; 'Teenagers'; 'E-health'; 'Internet-based'; 'Web-based'; 'Exercise'; 'Activity'; 'Sport' and 'Intervention' yielded 10 articles which fit the criteria for inclusion. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was used, and papers were excluded if they were disease focused, not specific to young people (those attending school, college or university) or did not measure PA as an outcome. RESULTS: Eight of the 10 studies had significant increases in PA as a result of an E-health intervention. Studies that did not use a theoretical principle to underpin their intervention did not achieve successful results. Interventions based on social cognitive theory were very successful in achieving an increase in PA. The theory of planned behaviour had mixed results, with studies having contrasting results. Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound (SMART) goal principle was not effective in increasing PA but had positive findings in supplementary outcomes such as goal setting. CONCLUSIONS: E-health interventions are a very successful way to increase PA. More research is required to look at what theoretical principles are best to underpin interventions and also to assess the length of intervention required for optimal results after intervention. Ideas surrounding implementation and the mediums used require more studies to evidence base these interventions for schools, colleges and university via intracurriculum or extracurriculum.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to review the current literature to assess the effectiveness of E-health interventions in increasing physical activity (PA) in young people. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: A search of the literature databases Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library using key words 'Adolescents'; 'Young people'; 'Students'; 'Young Adults'; 'Teenagers'; 'E-health'; 'Internet-based'; 'Web-based'; 'Exercise'; 'Activity'; 'Sport' and 'Intervention' yielded 10 articles which fit the criteria for inclusion. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was used, and papers were excluded if they were disease focused, not specific to young people (those attending school, college or university) or did not measure PA as an outcome. RESULTS: Eight of the 10 studies had significant increases in PA as a result of an E-health intervention. Studies that did not use a theoretical principle to underpin their intervention did not achieve successful results. Interventions based on social cognitive theory were very successful in achieving an increase in PA. The theory of planned behaviour had mixed results, with studies having contrasting results. Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound (SMART) goal principle was not effective in increasing PA but had positive findings in supplementary outcomes such as goal setting. CONCLUSIONS: E-health interventions are a very successful way to increase PA. More research is required to look at what theoretical principles are best to underpin interventions and also to assess the length of intervention required for optimal results after intervention. Ideas surrounding implementation and the mediums used require more studies to evidence base these interventions for schools, colleges and university via intracurriculum or extracurriculum.
Authors: Melissa Goldin Evans; Julia Fleckman; Tylar T Williams; Stephanie M Tokarz; Katherine P Theall Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2021-10-08
Authors: Chelsea L Kracht; Melinda Hutchesson; Mavra Ahmed; Andre Matthias Müller; Lee M Ashton; Hannah M Brown; Ann DeSmet; Carol A Maher; Chelsea E Mauch; Corneel Vandelanotte; Zenong Yin; Megan Whatnall; Camille E Short; Amanda E Staiano Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Dandan Mo; Mi Xiang; Mengyun Luo; Yuanyuan Dong; Yue Fang; Shunxing Zhang; Zhiruo Zhang; Huigang Liang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kelly A Aschbrenner; John A Naslund; Elizabeth F Tomlinson; Allison Kinney; Sarah I Pratt; Mary F Brunette Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2019-07-02