Literature DB >> 28481648

Data-Intensive Science and Research Integrity.

David B Resnik1, Kevin C Elliott2,3,4, Patricia A Soranno3, Elise M Smith1.   

Abstract

In this commentary, we consider questions related to research integrity in data-intensive science and argue that there is no need to create a distinct category of misconduct that applies to deception related to processing, analyzing, or interpreting data. The best way to promote integrity in data-intensive science is to maintain a firm commitment to epistemological and ethical values, such as honesty, openness, transparency, and objectivity, which apply to all types of research, and to promote education, policy development, and scholarly debate concerning appropriate uses of statistics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data-intensive science; deception; education; ethics; misconduct; research integrity; transparency

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28481648      PMCID: PMC6060414          DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1327813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  26 in total

1.  Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.

Authors:  J J Dooley; H M Kerch
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Computer science. Beyond the data deluge.

Authors:  Gordon Bell; Tony Hey; Alex Szalay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Philosophies of funding.

Authors:  Maureen A O'Malley; Kevin C Elliott; Chris Haufe; Richard M Burian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The epistemic integrity of scientific research.

Authors:  Jan De Winter; Laszlo Kosolosky
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods.

Authors:  Victoria Stodden; Marcia McNutt; David H Bailey; Ewa Deelman; Yolanda Gil; Brooks Hanson; Michael A Heroux; John P A Ioannidis; Michela Taufer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Jeffrey M Dueker
Journal:  J Res Adm       Date:  2009

8.  Research misconduct definitions adopted by U.S. research institutions.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Talicia Neal; Austin Raymond; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  What's in a picture? The temptation of image manipulation.

Authors:  Mike Rossner; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  It's Good to Share: Why Environmental Scientists' Ethics Are Out of Date.

Authors:  Patricia A Soranno; Kendra S Cheruvelil; Kevin C Elliott; Georgina M Montgomery
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 8.589

View more
  1 in total

1.  Auditing data resolves systemic errors in databases and confirms mycorrhizal trait consistency for most genera and families of flowering plants.

Authors:  Mark C Brundrett
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.856

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.