| Literature DB >> 28481648 |
David B Resnik1, Kevin C Elliott2,3,4, Patricia A Soranno3, Elise M Smith1.
Abstract
In this commentary, we consider questions related to research integrity in data-intensive science and argue that there is no need to create a distinct category of misconduct that applies to deception related to processing, analyzing, or interpreting data. The best way to promote integrity in data-intensive science is to maintain a firm commitment to epistemological and ethical values, such as honesty, openness, transparency, and objectivity, which apply to all types of research, and to promote education, policy development, and scholarly debate concerning appropriate uses of statistics.Entities:
Keywords: Data-intensive science; deception; education; ethics; misconduct; research integrity; transparency
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28481648 PMCID: PMC6060414 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1327813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Account Res ISSN: 0898-9621 Impact factor: 2.622