Rui Rijo Carvalho1,2, Sidharam P Pujari1, Elwin X Vrouwe2, Han Zuilhof1,3,4. 1. Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Wageningen University & Research , Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands. 2. Micronit Microtechnologies B.V. , Colosseum 15, 7521 PV Enschede, The Netherlands. 3. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Tianjin University , 92 Weijin Road, Tianjin 300072, P.R. China. 4. Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, King Abdulaziz University , Jeddah 23218, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
Plastics, such as cyclic olefin copolymer (COC), are becoming an increasingly popular material for microfluidics. COC is used, in part, because of its (bio)-chemical resistance. However, its inertness and hydrophobicity can be a major downside for many bioapplications. In this paper, we show the first example of a surface-bound selective C-H activation of COC into alcohol C-OH moieties under mild aqueous conditions at room temperature. The nucleophilic COC-OH surface allows for subsequent covalent attachments, such as of a H-terminated silane. The resulting hybrid material (COC-Si-H) was then modified via a photolithographic hydrosilylation in the presence of ω-functionalized 1-alkenes to form a new highly stable, solvent-resistant hybrid surface.
Plastics, such as cyclic olefin copolymer (COC), are becoming an increasingly popular material for microfluidics. COC is used, in part, because of its (bio)-chemical resistance. However, its inertness and hydrophobicity can be a major downside for many bioapplications. In this paper, we show the first example of a surface-bound selective C-H activation of COC into alcohol C-OH moieties under mild aqueous conditions at room temperature. The nucleophilic COC-OH surface allows for subsequent covalent attachments, such as of a H-terminated silane. The resulting hybrid material (COC-Si-H) was then modified via a photolithographic hydrosilylation in the presence of ω-functionalized 1-alkenes to form a new highly stable, solvent-resistant hybrid surface.
Cyclic olefin copolymers (COCs) are emerging
as an increasingly popular substrate material for microfluidics. This
is mostly due to their optical transparency, chemical resistance,
low water absorption properties, and good biocompatibility.[1] However, COC being quite inert toward chemical
modification, of course, hinders the ability to covalently functionalize
the surface.[2] A series of methods have
been investigated that endow functionalities to COC, as well as reducing
its hydrophobicity, (static water contact angles of COC are typically
>95°).[1] For instance, covalent
coupling of a silane in plasma conditions can be used to modify COC
surfaces.[3] Other reported modification
strategies also rely on harsh conditions such as sputtering deposition
of a SiO2 thin layer,[4] oxygen-plasma
pretreatment,[2,5] UV/ozone oxidation,[6] UV-photografting,[3] or UV-induced catalytic oxidation.[7,8] Plasma/gas
based approaches may work on exposed surfaces, but face restrictions
caused by the limited diffusion distance of the reactive species into
the narrow microfluidic channels. In addition, despite the transparency
of COC at short wavelengths, prolonged UV exposure yellows COC and
can turn it opaque, reducing transmittance.[9−11]Additionally,
common polymeric substrates for microfluidic applications have a disadvantage
in their low solvent resistance. Thermoplastics, such as COC, show
increased solvent resistance, but despite the modification with polymeric
functional coatings, the applications are mostly using polar solvents.[12−15] Usage of fluorinated-polymers, although shown to be resistant to
organic solvents, yields hydrophobic surfaces that are not functionalizable.[16]Copper is known to be an instrumental
component in many oxidases present in nature.[17,18] Copper(II) complexes have been used to oxidize alkanes under mild
conditions.[19] Norbornane, one of the constituents
of COC, has structural similarities to cyclohexane, which has been
reported to be a suitable substrate for mild peroxidative oxidation.[20] It has been reported for cyclohexane (Cy) that
a radical chain mechanism leads to the formation of alkyl hydroperoxide
intermediates (CyOO•), which by addition of suitable
additives might be converted into alcohols (CyOH).[21] We thus reasoned that oxidation of a COC surface with these
solution-based methods should be feasible, to create alcohol (COC–OH) and carbonyl (COC=O) functional
groups. Specifically, we were interested in appropriate methodologies
that are able to preferentially form COC–OH, as
a monofunctional surface coating would increase the definition of
and control over surface properties. COC–OH alcohol
groups would provide surface-bound nucleophilic anchors that, similarly
to Si–OH on glass, allow for, for example, the covalent attachment
of a very wide array of molecules.[22] As
a case in point, we demonstrate here the attachment of a silane,[8] as this allows photochemical patterning at a
later stage.We have recently reported on the deposition of
a hydrogen-terminated silane on glass (H-glass) and subsequent UV
irradiation (302 nm) in the presence of terminal alkenes.[23] We then improved this approach by incorporating
a radical-stabilizing substituent (H-Φ-glass), thus reducing
the activation energy threshold to light with a wavelength of 328
nm.[24] This allowed the direct attachment
of an NHS-containing alkene and subsequent localized DNA attachment.
Now typically commercial microfluidic devices are manufactured (and
functionalized) in parts and then later bonded together. However,
many (bio)chemical functions that can be introduced locally with our
method are not compatible with the use of the high temperatures needed
for bonding. Additionally, such thermal treatments result in a loss
of imbued hydrophilicity (by plasma or otherwise) due to surficial
polymer reorganization. There are two ways to approach this problem,
either to find a method that allows for low-temperature bonding of
high-Tg COC (while keeping the COC-surface
chemistry unchanged), or to develop a method to modify COC posterior
to the bonding procedure. Our paper addresses the latter approach.In this paper, we therefore show that this approach can be adapted
to modify COC substrates into a new hybrid material, hydrogen-terminated-(phenyl)-silanized
COC (COC-Si-Φ-H), by modifying COC–OH with a mixture of trichlorosilane and phenyldichlorosilane (5:1
molar ratio). This modification of COC allows for a mild photolithographic
covalent attachment (λ = 328 nm) of terminal alkenes onto COC
surfaces, including enclosed surfaces such as the inside of microfluidic
channels (Scheme ).
Scheme 1
Scheme for (i) the Modification of COC into a Nucleophilic Surface, COC–OH, via (ii) Copper-Catalyzed Peroxidative Oxidation
Followed by a Mild Reductive Washing Step; (iii) Subsequent Silanization
with HSiCl3/HSiPhCl2 (5:1 molar ratio) Yields
the COC-Si-Φ-H Hybrid Material; (iv) This Hybrid Material
Is Then Used for Mild Light-Induced Hydrosilylation with a Terminal
Alkene
Experimental
Section
Acetone (Aldrich, semiconductor grade VLSI PUNARAL
Honeywell 17617), dichloromethane (DCM, Sigma-Aldrich) and n-hexane (Merck Millipore) were used for cleaning before
modification. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
and used as received. 10-Trifluoro-acetamide-1-decene (TFAAD) was
synthesized based on literature methods.[23,25,26] COC 6013 was purchased from TOPAS.
Oxidation of
the COC Surface
For monolayer formation on flat substrates,
cyclic olefin copolymer, COC 6013 (TOPAS), was milled into 1 ×
1 cm pieces and sonicated for 30 min in ethanol/acetone (1:1), subsequently
dried with argon, and placed under vacuum for 1 h at room temperature.
Surface modifications were conducted directly afterward.COC
is quite inert and lacks nucleophilic groups on the surface. These
groups act as covalent anchoring points for the intended subsequent
silanization steps. Two oxidation methodologies were thus studied.
A simple way of oxidizing the COC substrate is by using an air plasma
for 30 s. This method is not compatible with bonded microfluidic channels.
Solution-based oxidation of COC was performed via peroxidative oxidation
of the COC surface for 20 min. The surface was immersed and sonicated
(37 kHz, RT) immediately after mixing a 5 mL solution of Cu(OAc)2 (73 mg, cf 20 mM) in 15 mL of 30% H2O2 (cf 22.5% (v/v)), rinsed with ethanol, and
blow-dried with N2 flow to remove surficial water, followed
by sonication in a methanolic solution of NaBH4 (112 mM)
for 5 min. Sonication prevents nucleation of gas bubbles on the COC
surface, which hinder the surface modification. Freshness of the hydrogen
peroxide, and thus its high concentration, is necessary for a proper
oxidation of the surface.Oxidation inside a microfluidic channel
was performed by flushing the above-mentioned solution for 20 min
at a 50 μL/min flow rate (channel dimensions: width 300 μm,
height 150 μm).
Formation of Hydrogen-Terminated Si-COC (H-SiCOC)
Gas phase modification of COC with HSiCl3 was performed
as previously described.[23]
Formation of
Hydrogen-Terminated (Phenyl)-Si-COC (H-Φ-SiCOC)
A 1:5
molar mixture of Cl2PhSi-H and Cl3Si-H was added
to semiconductor grade acetone under bubbling N2. The oxidized
COC surfaces (1 × 1 cm) were immersed for 20 min. Afterward,
the substrates were washed copiously with ethanol, dried under argon
and stored in an opaque container. For the microfluidic chip, the
solution was flushed and allowed to react for 20 min. After which,
acetone was copiously flushed through.
Photochemical Surface Modification
A drop of TFAAD was placed on a H-SiCOC or H-Φ-SiCOC slide
in a glovebox. An appropriate cutoff filter (295 or 320 nm) was placed
on the drop and gently pressed against the first slide,[27] homogeneously spreading the alkene, mimicking
a closed glass microfluidic channel while blocking the reaction from
undesirable high energy emissions. The surfaces were then illuminated
with a pen lamp (pen lamp 302 or 328 nm, Jelight Company, Irvine,
CA, USA), which was placed approximately 1 cm above the surface. A
cutoff filter is necessary due to a strong presence of higher energy
wavelengths (Figures S1 and S2). The entire
setup (lamp and substrate) was covered in aluminum foil, and the sample
irradiated for 16 h. After irradiation, the substrates were rinsed
with acetone, sonicated in ethanol/acetone for 5 min and quickly dried
under argon. The surfaces were directly used for surface characterization
or stored under air.
Photolithography
Photolithography
was performed with a pen lamp, as in the aforementioned setup, in
combination with a gold electron microscope grid (SEM F1, Gilder Grids, Figure S3). This photolithographic mask was placed
on top of the H-SiCOC or H-Φ-SiCOC slide with a drop of TFAAD.
After spreading of the liquid, a cutoff filter was placed on top of
the mask as a cover, above which the pen lamp was placed (ca. 1 cm
distance). Samples were irradiated for 16 h, removed from the glovebox,
and cleaned as described above. The patterns were examined with optical
microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Photolithography
on the microfluidic devices were performed by first flushing TFAAD,
followed by irradiation under the same conditions as described above
(the light-induced reaction was carried out on a stopped-flow). The
photomask used was a thick aluminum foil taped to a section of the
device, blocking light on half of the chip.
Monolayer Characterization
Static
Water Contact Angle Measurements (SCA)
Static water contact
angles (SCA) were measured using a Krüss DSA-100 goniometer.
Droplets of 3 μL were dispensed on the surface, and contact
angles measured with a CCD camera using a tangential method (method
2). The reported value is the average of at least five droplets of
at least three different samples.
Germanium Attenuated Total
Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (GATR-FTIR)
GATR-FTIR spectra were recorded with a Bruker Tensor 27 FT-IR spectrometer,
using a commercial variable-angle reflection unit (Auto Seagull, Harrick
Scientific). A Harrick grid polarizer was installed in front of the
detector and was used for measuring spectra with p-polarized radiation with respect to the plane of incidence at the
sample surface. Single channel transmittance spectra were collected
at an angle of 25° using a spectral resolution of 4 cm–1 and 1024 scans while flushing with dry N2. Obtained spectra
were referenced with a clean silanized COC substrate (silanized COC
substrates were referenced with oxidized COC).
X-ray Photoelectron
Spectroscopy (XPS)
XPS spectra were recorded on a JPS-9200
photoelectron spectrometer (JEOL, Japan). The analysis was performed
under ultrahigh vacuum conditions using a monochromatic Al Kα
source at 12 kV and 20 mA and an analyzer pass energy of 10 eV. A
takeoff angle ϕ of 80° was used, with a precision of ±1°.
All XPS spectra were analyzed with Casa XPS software (version 2.3.15).
The binding energies were calibrated on the hydrocarbon (CH2) peak with a binding energy of 285.0 eV. Because of the electrostatic
charging of the surface during the measurements, a charge compensation
was used with an accelerating voltage of 2.8 eV and a filament current
of 4.80 A.
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
AFM
imaging was performed under air using both a Digital Instruments NanoScope
V Multimode Scanning Probe Microscopy (Bruker, MA) and a JSPM-5400
(Jeol, Japan) Scanning Probe Microscope in AC-AFM (“tapping”)
mode with a noncontact silicon nitride cantilever with a stiffness
of 0.58 N/m (Veeco Metrology, Santa Barbara, CA) at a scan speed of
1 μm/s, in the Scan-assist imaging mode. Images were flattened
with a second-order flattening procedure using Nanoscope Analysis
software (v1.5) and WinSPM software (v 5.0).
Scanning Electron Microscopy/Scanning
Auger Microscopy (SEM/SAM)
Morphologies of TFAAD micropatterns
were analyzed by SEM. Measurements were performed at room temperature
with a scanning Auger electron spectroscope system (JEOL Ltd. JAMP-9500F
field emission scanning Auger microprobe). SEM images were acquired
with a primary beam of 0.8 keV. The takeoff angle of the instrument
was 0°.
Results and Discussion
In order
to be able to covalently silanize a COC substrate, the surface first
needs to be activated. Activation of a COC surface into a nucleophilic
anchor-containing surface can be achieved via oxidation of the alkane
surface into C–OH groups (e.g., alcohol or acid). A ubiquitous
surface oxidation method makes use of oxygen or air plasma, modifying
the C–H terminus into a C-Ox (e.g., alcohol, acid, ketone,
aldehyde). This plasma method was evaluated and compared with a mild
oxidation based on exposure to an aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide
(22.5% (v/v)) and copper acetate (20 mM) (Figure ).
Figure 1
GATR-FTIR of a COC surface after oxidation by
(a) air plasma for 10 s, (b) copper-catalyzed peroxidative oxidation
for 30 min, or (c) copper-catalyzed peroxidative oxidation with HNO3 as additive for 30 min. (d) COC–OH surface (COC oxidized
with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture followed by washing
with methanolic NaBH4 (with unmodified COC used as a reference
background)).
GATR-FTIR of a COC surface after oxidation by
(a) air plasma for 10 s, (b) copper-catalyzed peroxidative oxidation
for 30 min, or (c) copper-catalyzed peroxidative oxidation with HNO3 as additive for 30 min. (d) COC–OH surface (COC oxidized
with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture followed by washing
with methanolicNaBH4 (with unmodified COC used as a reference
background)).An air plasma-based treatment
of COC substrates for 10 s gives immediate results. The static water
contact angle drops from 100° to <30°, indicating the
rapid formation of hydrophilic surface groups. From GATR-FTIR measurements
it becomes clear that a variety of surficial carbonyl species are
present (Figure a),
as expected under the harsh oxidation conditions provided by plasma.
Wide range XPS data reveal an increase in total oxygen content, while
XPS C 1s narrow scans show many peaks to indicate that multiple functional
groups are now present on the surface (due to the presence of various
oxidized forms of carbon, e.g., (–OH) 286.9 and 289.3 (=O). Unfortunately, this surface-modification technique is
not able to homogeneously functionalize the inside of intricate COC
channels because of plasma-diffusion limitations in microfluidic devices.[28]In order to bypass the limitations stated
above, we looked into other C–H activation chemistries.[20,21,29,30] Due to the similarities between COC and (cyclo)hexane, we hypothesized
that this copper-catalyzed water-based chemistry could also work on
a COC surface. To test this, we first exposed COC to 30% (v/v) H2O2 and no change in the water contact angle was
observed, even after simultaneous sonication for 30 min. However,
upon the addition of copper(II) acetate, a contact angle of 83 ±
2° was obtained in just 30 min.Shul’pin reviewed
how the addition of additives, such as PPh3, in the washing/quenching
solution can be used to favor the decomposition of the CyOO species into the alcohol (CyOH) counterparts
instead of into ketones or other minor overoxidation products such
as esters.[21] However, attempts to use PPh3 to favor the conversion of COC-OO to COC–OH did not yield satisfactory results.
The PPh3 oxidation adduct (O=PPh3) forms
a sticky precipitate that whitens the substrates and clogs microfluidic
channels. Adding a small amount of nitric acid (20 mM) in the oxidation
solution, increased the yield slightly and shows some tuning ability
toward the alcohol product is possible; similar results were found
in solution.[31] However, we found an easy
alternative method by using methanolicNaBH4 in the washing
step (by sonication for 5 min) of the copper-catalyzed oxidized surfaces.
This yielded further a reduction in the water static contact angle
to 72 ± 2° (Table S1). These
values are close to those of other COC–OH substrates
found in literature.[7,8] Our method represents a clear
improvement in that it is much milder (no UV required, room temperature,
aqueous solution), and leaves far less contaminants on the surface.To further corroborate this, the surfaces were analyzed by GATR-FTIR
(Figure b–d).
The presence of alcohol (3174 cm–1) and carbonyl
groups (1735 cm–1) indicates that the surface has
undergone oxidation. Evidently, the intensity of carbonyl-related
stretching peaks is reduced compared to what is observed upon air
plasma-treatment, suggesting that the aqueous Cu/H2O2 oxidation is mild compared to plasma treatment. Of specific
interest is the basically flat IR spectrum in the C=O region
(Figure d) upon NaBH4 washing. Finally, the formation of C=O and C–OH
bonds implies a lower amount of surficial CH and CH2 bonds
(compared to the reference background), leading to the inversion of
those peaks (i.e., positive peaks around 2850–2950 cm–1).XPS wide scans show that our peroxidative treatment yields
a clear increase of oxygen content when compared to bare COC, and
less than for plasma-treated COC (Figure (i). In Figure (ii) the C 1s narrow scans indicate a predominance
of –C bonds (285.0 eV)
for all substrates, whereas in the oxidized substrates –OH and =O are distinctively present (286.8 and 289.3 eV).
In Figure (iii), the
O 1s narrow scans show the presence of C–-H (532.7 eV – 57.6%) and O–C= (533.8 eV – 42.4%) for the COC that was
subject to plasma treatment; COC that has been subjected to the Cu/H2O2 or Cu/H2O2/HNO3 oxidation show a predominant presence of C-–H (532.4 eV – 56 or 68%) along with the less
prevalent C= (531.4 eV,
17.2 or 11.6%), O–C= (534.0 eV, 26.5 or 20.1%), and copperoxide (529.9 eV) contaminants
due to just washing with water for analysis purposes. COC that was
oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2 and washed with methanolicNaBH4 shows a quantitative formation of surficial C–OH
(Figure (iii-d) 532.4
eV).[32]
Figure 2
XPS wide scans (i), C 1s (ii) and O 1s
(iii) narrow scans of (a) COC subjected to air plasma; (b) COC oxidized
with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture; (c) COC oxidized with
Cu(II)/H2O2/HNO3 mixture; (d) COC
oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture and washed
with methanolic NaBH4; (e) bare COC.
XPS wide scans (i), C 1s (ii) and O 1s
(iii) narrow scans of (a) COC subjected to air plasma; (b) COC oxidized
with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture; (c) COC oxidized with
Cu(II)/H2O2/HNO3 mixture; (d) COC
oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture and washed
with methanolicNaBH4; (e) bare COC.In line with the IR and C 1s XPS results, the inclusion of
the reductive NaBH4 washing step yields a near-quantitative
conversion to alcohols, free of Cuoxide contaminants.[33] While traditional plasma activation is a viable
and operationally simple option in many instances, the resulting presence
of basically only one type of oxidized carbon obtained at room temperature
is a major accomplishment by our method compared to air/oxygen plasma
methods.[34]As previously mentioned,
the ability to generate OH-terminated COC surfaces allows for a wide
variety of functionalization chemistries. In the current paper, we
present as an example the first of those under current development.
Given the increasing use of COC in the fabrication of microfluidic
devices, chemistries that allow for plastics photolithography are
extremely desirable.[35] In line with our
previous work done on borosilicate glass,[23,24] we aimed to modify COC–OH with a 5:1 molar mixture
of trichlorosilane and dichlorophenylsilane. With this, we envisioned
to fabricate a hybrid material, hydrogen-(phenyl)-terminated silanized
COC (COC-Si-Φ-H), that would have a similar reactivity
as the previously reported H-Φ-glass.Of specific interest
were the findings that H-Φ-glass was shown to be highly stable
in air for months, while being smoothly reactive toward alkenes using
light of ∼328 nm.[23,24]The hybrid material COC-Si-Φ-H was prepared along these lines and analyzed.
Static water contact angles (85° for COC–Si-H and 90° for COC-Si-Φ-H) were similar to the ones
we reported for analogous silicon-based substrates.[23,24] XPS wide scans (Figure a) show the presence of Si at 102 eV, indicating the formation
of an ultrathin layer on top of COC. Analysis by GATR-FTIR, while
using COC–OH as a reference background–see Figure d for its spectrum–confirms
the presence of two different Si–H stretching bands, which
we attributed to O3Si–H at 2249 cm–1 and to O2ΦSi–H at 2185 cm–1 (Figure c).
Figure 3
(a) XPS wide
scan of (b) a COC-Si-Φ-H substrate. (c) GATR-FTIR
of the COC-Si-Φ-H substrates, showing the two Si–H
stretching vibrations (COC–OH was used as reference
background).
(a) XPS wide
scan of (b) a COC-Si-Φ-H substrate. (c) GATR-FTIR
of the COC-Si-Φ-H substrates, showing the two Si–H
stretching vibrations (COC–OH was used as reference
background).Having characterized
the COC-Si-Φ-H substrates, we proceeded with modifying
it further via light-induced hydrosilylation. For this, we chose 10-trifluoro-acetamide-1-decene
(TFAAD) as developed by Hamers[36−39] as a reactivity probe. This alkene is useful to evaluate
attachment, due to the IR-active carbonyl group and three C–F
bonds with characteristic XPS C 1s and F 1s signals, and can be easily
converted into an amine, upon deprotection.COC-Si-Φ-H substrates were modified with TFAAD using 328 nm light. The TFAAD-substituted COC-Si-Φ-H substrates were characterized by GATR-FTIR using COC-Si-Φ-H as reference background (see Figure c for the spectrum of COC-Si-Φ-H itself). The carbonyl stretching peak from TFAAD
was clearly present at 1705 cm–1 (Figure c).[23] The reversal of the Si–H peaks at 2249 and 2185 cm–1 indicates that there are less Si–H bonds than before the
hydrosilylation, i.e., that the alkene reacted with the hydrogen-terminated
surfaces forming Si–C bonds. Wide range XPS scans show the
presence of fluorine, while C 1s narrow scans indicate the presence
of CF3 groups at 293.5 eV (Figure S4). This further confirms covalent attachment of TFAAD onto the COC-Si-Φ-H surfaces.
Figure 4
(a) XPS wide scan of (b) a COC-Si-Φ-H substrate modified with TFAAD in the presence of 328 nm light for
16 h. (c) GATR-FTIR of the TFAAD modified substrates, showing inversion
of the two types of Si–H stretching vibrations and presence
of the carbonyl from TFAAD.
(a) XPS wide scan of (b) a COC-Si-Φ-H substrate modified with TFAAD in the presence of 328 nm light for
16 h. (c) GATR-FTIR of the TFAAD modified substrates, showing inversion
of the two types of Si–H stretching vibrations and presence
of the carbonyl from TFAAD.Similarly to the results obtained on glass, AFM measurements
of these surfaces show that the roughness does not change considerably
upon modification (RMS roughness from 1.9 ± 0.5 nm to 2.0 ±
0.5 nm) (Table S2), which is another significant
improvement over plasma-based oxidations.[21]Photolithography on open substrates was performed by positioning
a contact mask (circular TEM grid with circles and spokes, Figure S3) on top of the COC-Si-Φ-H substrates during the light-induced hydrosilylation reaction. We
then planned to visualize the resulting pattern by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) (Figure , Table S3).
Figure 5
(a) Photograph and (b)
SEM image of a TFAAD-patterned COC-Si-Φ-H after exposure
to DCM (30 min); (c, d) close-ups of the regions denoted by the dashed
squares in b.
(a) Photograph and (b)
SEM image of a TFAAD-patterned COC-Si-Φ-H after exposure
to DCM (30 min); (c, d) close-ups of the regions denoted by the dashed
squares in b.Interestingly, when cleaning
the modified substrate with dichloromethane (DCM) for 5 min to allow
for SEM measurements, we observed that the pattern had slowly become
visible by naked eye. Further exposure to DCM (30 min) showed clear
degradation by the solvent of the nonexposed areas, while the TFAAD-modified
areas resisted solvent damage effectively (Figure a–d). Overall, the ability to covalently
bind an ultrathin, yet highly protective coating that can be further
modified,[37,40] opens the use of these substrates for many
applications.We then finally proceeded to modify the channel
of an already bonded COC microreactor (Micronit) into COC–OH by flowing the oxidation solution for 20 min at 50 μL/min
and washing for 5 min (50 μL/min) with methanolicNaBH4. Silanization was carried out and a fully modified COC-Si-Φ-H microfluidic channel was photopatterned with TFAAD (see Supporting Information for details). We then
tested the ability of the TFAAD patches to protect the device from
a prolonged flow of DCM (30 min at 50 μL/min). As can be seen
from Figure b, the
coating provides significant protection even to harsh solvents such
as DCM. In the absence of a protective coating (Figure b, c), the polymer swells and cracks, starting
as stripe-like cracks at the side of the channel (Figure b). In addition, the bonding
strength between the COC top and bottom substrates is severely weakened
and leakage occurs. Since the TFAAD moiety is by no means optimized
for this purpose, functional group optimization will likely provide
significant possibilities for further improvement of the protection.
Figure 6
Microscope
image of plastic microchip with (a) a TFAAD-modified COC channel;
(b) a partially TFAAD-modified COC channel (the faint orange part
on the left was coated; the right part is uncoated) after exposure
to a flow of DCM (white arrow indicates flow direction; 50 μL/min;
30 min), showing significantly more damage in the uncoated part; (c)
untreated COC submitted to the same treatment.
Microscope
image of plastic microchip with (a) a TFAAD-modified COC channel;
(b) a partially TFAAD-modified COC channel (the faint orange part
on the left was coated; the right part is uncoated) after exposure
to a flow of DCM (white arrow indicates flow direction; 50 μL/min;
30 min), showing significantly more damage in the uncoated part; (c)
untreated COC submitted to the same treatment.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a mild aqueous
C–H activation method to modify the surface of cyclic olefin
copolymers (COC). This method can be applied to open plastic substrates
as well as to bonded microchannels, and yields highly defined alcohol-terminated
COC surfaces without carbonyl-containing moieties. Because of their
nucleophilic character, such surface-bound alcohol moieties can be
used for a very wide array of surface modifications. When, for example,
reacted with hydrosilanes (such as Cl3Si–H or Cl2PhSi-H), this surface yields a hydrogen-terminated Si-COC
surface. This new hybrid surface is highly stable in air and photopatternable
via a mild light-induced hydrosilylation with terminal alkenes. The
TFAAD functional monolayer attached in this fashion enhanced the resistance
of the COC to organic solvents (e.g., DCM). In addition, TFAAD is
well-known for its ability to undergo further surface modifications
for, for example, biological applications.[37,40,41]This research opens a door toward
the mild activation of what was considered a highly inert substrate
that required harsh modification techniques. This technique is currently
transposed to other C–H containing polymer analogues, e.g.,
polyphenyl ethers/oxides (PPEs/PPOs), and speeding up the process
via the photochemical attachment of 1-silanols rather than 1-alkenes,
which is ca. 2 orders of magnitude faster on H-terminated Si(111),[42] is also under investigation in our laboratories.
Authors: Wensha Yang; Orlando Auciello; James E Butler; Wei Cai; John A Carlisle; Jennifer E Gerbi; Dieter M Gruen; Tanya Knickerbocker; Tami L Lasseter; John N Russell; Lloyd M Smith; Robert J Hamers Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Menglong Yang; Rosalie L M Teeuwen; Marcel Giesbers; Jacob Baggerman; Ahmed Arafat; Frits A de Wolf; Jan C M van Hest; Han Zuilhof Journal: Langmuir Date: 2008-07-12 Impact factor: 3.882