Literature DB >> 28481097

Mild and Selective C-H Activation of COC Microfluidic Channels Allowing Covalent Multifunctional Coatings.

Rui Rijo Carvalho1,2, Sidharam P Pujari1, Elwin X Vrouwe2, Han Zuilhof1,3,4.   

Abstract

Plastics, such as cyclic olefin copolymer (COC), are becoming an increasingly popular material for microfluidics. COC is used, in part, because of its (bio)-chemical resistance. However, its inertness and hydrophobicity can be a major downside for many bioapplications. In this paper, we show the first example of a surface-bound selective C-H activation of COC into alcohol C-OH moieties under mild aqueous conditions at room temperature. The nucleophilic COC-OH surface allows for subsequent covalent attachments, such as of a H-terminated silane. The resulting hybrid material (COC-Si-H) was then modified via a photolithographic hydrosilylation in the presence of ω-functionalized 1-alkenes to form a new highly stable, solvent-resistant hybrid surface.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cylic olefin copolymer; hybrid surface; hydrosilylation; microfluidics; mild oxidation; photolithography

Year:  2017        PMID: 28481097      PMCID: PMC5437660          DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b02022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


Introduction

Cyclic olefin copolymers (COCs) are emerging as an increasingly popular substrate material for microfluidics. This is mostly due to their optical transparency, chemical resistance, low water absorption properties, and good biocompatibility.[1] However, COC being quite inert toward chemical modification, of course, hinders the ability to covalently functionalize the surface.[2] A series of methods have been investigated that endow functionalities to COC, as well as reducing its hydrophobicity, (static water contact angles of COC are typically >95°).[1] For instance, covalent coupling of a silane in plasma conditions can be used to modify COC surfaces.[3] Other reported modification strategies also rely on harsh conditions such as sputtering deposition of a SiO2 thin layer,[4] oxygen-plasma pretreatment,[2,5] UV/ozone oxidation,[6] UV-photografting,[3] or UV-induced catalytic oxidation.[7,8] Plasma/gas based approaches may work on exposed surfaces, but face restrictions caused by the limited diffusion distance of the reactive species into the narrow microfluidic channels. In addition, despite the transparency of COC at short wavelengths, prolonged UV exposure yellows COC and can turn it opaque, reducing transmittance.[9−11] Additionally, common polymeric substrates for microfluidic applications have a disadvantage in their low solvent resistance. Thermoplastics, such as COC, show increased solvent resistance, but despite the modification with polymeric functional coatings, the applications are mostly using polar solvents.[12−15] Usage of fluorinated-polymers, although shown to be resistant to organic solvents, yields hydrophobic surfaces that are not functionalizable.[16] Copper is known to be an instrumental component in many oxidases present in nature.[17,18] Copper(II) complexes have been used to oxidize alkanes under mild conditions.[19] Norbornane, one of the constituents of COC, has structural similarities to cyclohexane, which has been reported to be a suitable substrate for mild peroxidative oxidation.[20] It has been reported for cyclohexane (Cy) that a radical chain mechanism leads to the formation of alkyl hydroperoxide intermediates (CyOO•), which by addition of suitable additives might be converted into alcohols (CyOH).[21] We thus reasoned that oxidation of a COC surface with these solution-based methods should be feasible, to create alcohol (COC–OH) and carbonyl (COC=O) functional groups. Specifically, we were interested in appropriate methodologies that are able to preferentially form COC–OH, as a monofunctional surface coating would increase the definition of and control over surface properties. COC–OH alcohol groups would provide surface-bound nucleophilic anchors that, similarly to Si–OH on glass, allow for, for example, the covalent attachment of a very wide array of molecules.[22] As a case in point, we demonstrate here the attachment of a silane,[8] as this allows photochemical patterning at a later stage. We have recently reported on the deposition of a hydrogen-terminated silane on glass (H-glass) and subsequent UV irradiation (302 nm) in the presence of terminal alkenes.[23] We then improved this approach by incorporating a radical-stabilizing substituent (H-Φ-glass), thus reducing the activation energy threshold to light with a wavelength of 328 nm.[24] This allowed the direct attachment of an NHS-containing alkene and subsequent localized DNA attachment. Now typically commercial microfluidic devices are manufactured (and functionalized) in parts and then later bonded together. However, many (bio)chemical functions that can be introduced locally with our method are not compatible with the use of the high temperatures needed for bonding. Additionally, such thermal treatments result in a loss of imbued hydrophilicity (by plasma or otherwise) due to surficial polymer reorganization. There are two ways to approach this problem, either to find a method that allows for low-temperature bonding of high-Tg COC (while keeping the COC-surface chemistry unchanged), or to develop a method to modify COC posterior to the bonding procedure. Our paper addresses the latter approach. In this paper, we therefore show that this approach can be adapted to modify COC substrates into a new hybrid material, hydrogen-terminated-(phenyl)-silanized COC (COC-Si-Φ-H), by modifying COC–OH with a mixture of trichlorosilane and phenyldichlorosilane (5:1 molar ratio). This modification of COC allows for a mild photolithographic covalent attachment (λ = 328 nm) of terminal alkenes onto COC surfaces, including enclosed surfaces such as the inside of microfluidic channels (Scheme ).
Scheme 1

Scheme for (i) the Modification of COC into a Nucleophilic Surface, COC–OH, via (ii) Copper-Catalyzed Peroxidative Oxidation Followed by a Mild Reductive Washing Step; (iii) Subsequent Silanization with HSiCl3/HSiPhCl2 (5:1 molar ratio) Yields the COC-Si-Φ-H Hybrid Material; (iv) This Hybrid Material Is Then Used for Mild Light-Induced Hydrosilylation with a Terminal Alkene

Experimental Section

Acetone (Aldrich, semiconductor grade VLSI PUNARAL Honeywell 17617), dichloromethane (DCM, Sigma-Aldrich) and n-hexane (Merck Millipore) were used for cleaning before modification. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. 10-Trifluoro-acetamide-1-decene (TFAAD) was synthesized based on literature methods.[23,25,26] COC 6013 was purchased from TOPAS.

Oxidation of the COC Surface

For monolayer formation on flat substrates, cyclic olefin copolymer, COC 6013 (TOPAS), was milled into 1 × 1 cm pieces and sonicated for 30 min in ethanol/acetone (1:1), subsequently dried with argon, and placed under vacuum for 1 h at room temperature. Surface modifications were conducted directly afterward. COC is quite inert and lacks nucleophilic groups on the surface. These groups act as covalent anchoring points for the intended subsequent silanization steps. Two oxidation methodologies were thus studied. A simple way of oxidizing the COC substrate is by using an air plasma for 30 s. This method is not compatible with bonded microfluidic channels. Solution-based oxidation of COC was performed via peroxidative oxidation of the COC surface for 20 min. The surface was immersed and sonicated (37 kHz, RT) immediately after mixing a 5 mL solution of Cu(OAc)2 (73 mg, cf 20 mM) in 15 mL of 30% H2O2 (cf 22.5% (v/v)), rinsed with ethanol, and blow-dried with N2 flow to remove surficial water, followed by sonication in a methanolic solution of NaBH4 (112 mM) for 5 min. Sonication prevents nucleation of gas bubbles on the COC surface, which hinder the surface modification. Freshness of the hydrogen peroxide, and thus its high concentration, is necessary for a proper oxidation of the surface. Oxidation inside a microfluidic channel was performed by flushing the above-mentioned solution for 20 min at a 50 μL/min flow rate (channel dimensions: width 300 μm, height 150 μm).

Formation of Hydrogen-Terminated Si-COC (H-SiCOC)

Gas phase modification of COC with HSiCl3 was performed as previously described.[23]

Formation of Hydrogen-Terminated (Phenyl)-Si-COC (H-Φ-SiCOC)

A 1:5 molar mixture of Cl2PhSi-H and Cl3Si-H was added to semiconductor grade acetone under bubbling N2. The oxidized COC surfaces (1 × 1 cm) were immersed for 20 min. Afterward, the substrates were washed copiously with ethanol, dried under argon and stored in an opaque container. For the microfluidic chip, the solution was flushed and allowed to react for 20 min. After which, acetone was copiously flushed through.

Photochemical Surface Modification

A drop of TFAAD was placed on a H-SiCOC or H-Φ-SiCOC slide in a glovebox. An appropriate cutoff filter (295 or 320 nm) was placed on the drop and gently pressed against the first slide,[27] homogeneously spreading the alkene, mimicking a closed glass microfluidic channel while blocking the reaction from undesirable high energy emissions. The surfaces were then illuminated with a pen lamp (pen lamp 302 or 328 nm, Jelight Company, Irvine, CA, USA), which was placed approximately 1 cm above the surface. A cutoff filter is necessary due to a strong presence of higher energy wavelengths (Figures S1 and S2). The entire setup (lamp and substrate) was covered in aluminum foil, and the sample irradiated for 16 h. After irradiation, the substrates were rinsed with acetone, sonicated in ethanol/acetone for 5 min and quickly dried under argon. The surfaces were directly used for surface characterization or stored under air.

Photolithography

Photolithography was performed with a pen lamp, as in the aforementioned setup, in combination with a gold electron microscope grid (SEM F1, Gilder Grids, Figure S3). This photolithographic mask was placed on top of the H-SiCOC or H-Φ-SiCOC slide with a drop of TFAAD. After spreading of the liquid, a cutoff filter was placed on top of the mask as a cover, above which the pen lamp was placed (ca. 1 cm distance). Samples were irradiated for 16 h, removed from the glovebox, and cleaned as described above. The patterns were examined with optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Photolithography on the microfluidic devices were performed by first flushing TFAAD, followed by irradiation under the same conditions as described above (the light-induced reaction was carried out on a stopped-flow). The photomask used was a thick aluminum foil taped to a section of the device, blocking light on half of the chip.

Monolayer Characterization

Static Water Contact Angle Measurements (SCA)

Static water contact angles (SCA) were measured using a Krüss DSA-100 goniometer. Droplets of 3 μL were dispensed on the surface, and contact angles measured with a CCD camera using a tangential method (method 2). The reported value is the average of at least five droplets of at least three different samples.

Germanium Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (GATR-FTIR)

GATR-FTIR spectra were recorded with a Bruker Tensor 27 FT-IR spectrometer, using a commercial variable-angle reflection unit (Auto Seagull, Harrick Scientific). A Harrick grid polarizer was installed in front of the detector and was used for measuring spectra with p-polarized radiation with respect to the plane of incidence at the sample surface. Single channel transmittance spectra were collected at an angle of 25° using a spectral resolution of 4 cm–1 and 1024 scans while flushing with dry N2. Obtained spectra were referenced with a clean silanized COC substrate (silanized COC substrates were referenced with oxidized COC).

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

XPS spectra were recorded on a JPS-9200 photoelectron spectrometer (JEOL, Japan). The analysis was performed under ultrahigh vacuum conditions using a monochromatic Al Kα source at 12 kV and 20 mA and an analyzer pass energy of 10 eV. A takeoff angle ϕ of 80° was used, with a precision of ±1°. All XPS spectra were analyzed with Casa XPS software (version 2.3.15). The binding energies were calibrated on the hydrocarbon (CH2) peak with a binding energy of 285.0 eV. Because of the electrostatic charging of the surface during the measurements, a charge compensation was used with an accelerating voltage of 2.8 eV and a filament current of 4.80 A.

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

AFM imaging was performed under air using both a Digital Instruments NanoScope V Multimode Scanning Probe Microscopy (Bruker, MA) and a JSPM-5400 (Jeol, Japan) Scanning Probe Microscope in AC-AFM (“tapping”) mode with a noncontact silicon nitride cantilever with a stiffness of 0.58 N/m (Veeco Metrology, Santa Barbara, CA) at a scan speed of 1 μm/s, in the Scan-assist imaging mode. Images were flattened with a second-order flattening procedure using Nanoscope Analysis software (v1.5) and WinSPM software (v 5.0).

Scanning Electron Microscopy/Scanning Auger Microscopy (SEM/SAM)

Morphologies of TFAAD micropatterns were analyzed by SEM. Measurements were performed at room temperature with a scanning Auger electron spectroscope system (JEOL Ltd. JAMP-9500F field emission scanning Auger microprobe). SEM images were acquired with a primary beam of 0.8 keV. The takeoff angle of the instrument was 0°.

Results and Discussion

In order to be able to covalently silanize a COC substrate, the surface first needs to be activated. Activation of a COC surface into a nucleophilic anchor-containing surface can be achieved via oxidation of the alkane surface into C–OH groups (e.g., alcohol or acid). A ubiquitous surface oxidation method makes use of oxygen or air plasma, modifying the C–H terminus into a C-Ox (e.g., alcohol, acid, ketone, aldehyde). This plasma method was evaluated and compared with a mild oxidation based on exposure to an aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide (22.5% (v/v)) and copper acetate (20 mM) (Figure ).
Figure 1

GATR-FTIR of a COC surface after oxidation by (a) air plasma for 10 s, (b) copper-catalyzed peroxidative oxidation for 30 min, or (c) copper-catalyzed peroxidative oxidation with HNO3 as additive for 30 min. (d) COC–OH surface (COC oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture followed by washing with methanolic NaBH4 (with unmodified COC used as a reference background)).

GATR-FTIR of a COC surface after oxidation by (a) air plasma for 10 s, (b) copper-catalyzed peroxidative oxidation for 30 min, or (c) copper-catalyzed peroxidative oxidation with HNO3 as additive for 30 min. (d) COC–OH surface (COC oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture followed by washing with methanolic NaBH4 (with unmodified COC used as a reference background)). An air plasma-based treatment of COC substrates for 10 s gives immediate results. The static water contact angle drops from 100° to <30°, indicating the rapid formation of hydrophilic surface groups. From GATR-FTIR measurements it becomes clear that a variety of surficial carbonyl species are present (Figure a), as expected under the harsh oxidation conditions provided by plasma. Wide range XPS data reveal an increase in total oxygen content, while XPS C 1s narrow scans show many peaks to indicate that multiple functional groups are now present on the surface (due to the presence of various oxidized forms of carbon, e.g., (–OH) 286.9 and 289.3 (=O). Unfortunately, this surface-modification technique is not able to homogeneously functionalize the inside of intricate COC channels because of plasma-diffusion limitations in microfluidic devices.[28] In order to bypass the limitations stated above, we looked into other C–H activation chemistries.[20,21,29,30] Due to the similarities between COC and (cyclo)hexane, we hypothesized that this copper-catalyzed water-based chemistry could also work on a COC surface. To test this, we first exposed COC to 30% (v/v) H2O2 and no change in the water contact angle was observed, even after simultaneous sonication for 30 min. However, upon the addition of copper(II) acetate, a contact angle of 83 ± 2° was obtained in just 30 min. Shul’pin reviewed how the addition of additives, such as PPh3, in the washing/quenching solution can be used to favor the decomposition of the CyOO species into the alcohol (CyOH) counterparts instead of into ketones or other minor overoxidation products such as esters.[21] However, attempts to use PPh3 to favor the conversion of COC-OO to COC–OH did not yield satisfactory results. The PPh3 oxidation adduct (O=PPh3) forms a sticky precipitate that whitens the substrates and clogs microfluidic channels. Adding a small amount of nitric acid (20 mM) in the oxidation solution, increased the yield slightly and shows some tuning ability toward the alcohol product is possible; similar results were found in solution.[31] However, we found an easy alternative method by using methanolic NaBH4 in the washing step (by sonication for 5 min) of the copper-catalyzed oxidized surfaces. This yielded further a reduction in the water static contact angle to 72 ± 2° (Table S1). These values are close to those of other COC–OH substrates found in literature.[7,8] Our method represents a clear improvement in that it is much milder (no UV required, room temperature, aqueous solution), and leaves far less contaminants on the surface. To further corroborate this, the surfaces were analyzed by GATR-FTIR (Figure b–d). The presence of alcohol (3174 cm–1) and carbonyl groups (1735 cm–1) indicates that the surface has undergone oxidation. Evidently, the intensity of carbonyl-related stretching peaks is reduced compared to what is observed upon air plasma-treatment, suggesting that the aqueous Cu/H2O2 oxidation is mild compared to plasma treatment. Of specific interest is the basically flat IR spectrum in the C=O region (Figure d) upon NaBH4 washing. Finally, the formation of C=O and C–OH bonds implies a lower amount of surficial CH and CH2 bonds (compared to the reference background), leading to the inversion of those peaks (i.e., positive peaks around 2850–2950 cm–1). XPS wide scans show that our peroxidative treatment yields a clear increase of oxygen content when compared to bare COC, and less than for plasma-treated COC (Figure (i). In Figure (ii) the C 1s narrow scans indicate a predominance of –C bonds (285.0 eV) for all substrates, whereas in the oxidized substrates –OH and =O are distinctively present (286.8 and 289.3 eV). In Figure (iii), the O 1s narrow scans show the presence of C–-H (532.7 eV – 57.6%) and O–C= (533.8 eV – 42.4%) for the COC that was subject to plasma treatment; COC that has been subjected to the Cu/H2O2 or Cu/H2O2/HNO3 oxidation show a predominant presence of C-–H (532.4 eV – 56 or 68%) along with the less prevalent C= (531.4 eV, 17.2 or 11.6%), O–C= (534.0 eV, 26.5 or 20.1%), and copper oxide (529.9 eV) contaminants due to just washing with water for analysis purposes. COC that was oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2 and washed with methanolic NaBH4 shows a quantitative formation of surficial C–OH (Figure (iii-d) 532.4 eV).[32]
Figure 2

XPS wide scans (i), C 1s (ii) and O 1s (iii) narrow scans of (a) COC subjected to air plasma; (b) COC oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture; (c) COC oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2/HNO3 mixture; (d) COC oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture and washed with methanolic NaBH4; (e) bare COC.

XPS wide scans (i), C 1s (ii) and O 1s (iii) narrow scans of (a) COC subjected to air plasma; (b) COC oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture; (c) COC oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2/HNO3 mixture; (d) COC oxidized with Cu(II)/H2O2 mixture and washed with methanolic NaBH4; (e) bare COC. In line with the IR and C 1s XPS results, the inclusion of the reductive NaBH4 washing step yields a near-quantitative conversion to alcohols, free of Cu oxide contaminants.[33] While traditional plasma activation is a viable and operationally simple option in many instances, the resulting presence of basically only one type of oxidized carbon obtained at room temperature is a major accomplishment by our method compared to air/oxygen plasma methods.[34] As previously mentioned, the ability to generate OH-terminated COC surfaces allows for a wide variety of functionalization chemistries. In the current paper, we present as an example the first of those under current development. Given the increasing use of COC in the fabrication of microfluidic devices, chemistries that allow for plastics photolithography are extremely desirable.[35] In line with our previous work done on borosilicate glass,[23,24] we aimed to modify COC–OH with a 5:1 molar mixture of trichlorosilane and dichlorophenylsilane. With this, we envisioned to fabricate a hybrid material, hydrogen-(phenyl)-terminated silanized COC (COC-Si-Φ-H), that would have a similar reactivity as the previously reported H-Φ-glass. Of specific interest were the findings that H-Φ-glass was shown to be highly stable in air for months, while being smoothly reactive toward alkenes using light of ∼328 nm.[23,24] The hybrid material COC-Si-Φ-H was prepared along these lines and analyzed. Static water contact angles (85° for COCSi-H and 90° for COC-Si-Φ-H) were similar to the ones we reported for analogous silicon-based substrates.[23,24] XPS wide scans (Figure a) show the presence of Si at 102 eV, indicating the formation of an ultrathin layer on top of COC. Analysis by GATR-FTIR, while using COC–OH as a reference background–see Figure d for its spectrum–confirms the presence of two different Si–H stretching bands, which we attributed to O3Si–H at 2249 cm–1 and to O2ΦSi–H at 2185 cm–1 (Figure c).
Figure 3

(a) XPS wide scan of (b) a COC-Si-Φ-H substrate. (c) GATR-FTIR of the COC-Si-Φ-H substrates, showing the two Si–H stretching vibrations (COC–OH was used as reference background).

(a) XPS wide scan of (b) a COC-Si-Φ-H substrate. (c) GATR-FTIR of the COC-Si-Φ-H substrates, showing the two Si–H stretching vibrations (COC–OH was used as reference background). Having characterized the COC-Si-Φ-H substrates, we proceeded with modifying it further via light-induced hydrosilylation. For this, we chose 10-trifluoro-acetamide-1-decene (TFAAD) as developed by Hamers[36−39] as a reactivity probe. This alkene is useful to evaluate attachment, due to the IR-active carbonyl group and three C–F bonds with characteristic XPS C 1s and F 1s signals, and can be easily converted into an amine, upon deprotection. COC-Si-Φ-H substrates were modified with TFAAD using 328 nm light. The TFAAD-substituted COC-Si-Φ-H substrates were characterized by GATR-FTIR using COC-Si-Φ-H as reference background (see Figure c for the spectrum of COC-Si-Φ-H itself). The carbonyl stretching peak from TFAAD was clearly present at 1705 cm–1 (Figure c).[23] The reversal of the Si–H peaks at 2249 and 2185 cm–1 indicates that there are less Si–H bonds than before the hydrosilylation, i.e., that the alkene reacted with the hydrogen-terminated surfaces forming SiC bonds. Wide range XPS scans show the presence of fluorine, while C 1s narrow scans indicate the presence of CF3 groups at 293.5 eV (Figure S4). This further confirms covalent attachment of TFAAD onto the COC-Si-Φ-H surfaces.
Figure 4

(a) XPS wide scan of (b) a COC-Si-Φ-H substrate modified with TFAAD in the presence of 328 nm light for 16 h. (c) GATR-FTIR of the TFAAD modified substrates, showing inversion of the two types of Si–H stretching vibrations and presence of the carbonyl from TFAAD.

(a) XPS wide scan of (b) a COC-Si-Φ-H substrate modified with TFAAD in the presence of 328 nm light for 16 h. (c) GATR-FTIR of the TFAAD modified substrates, showing inversion of the two types of Si–H stretching vibrations and presence of the carbonyl from TFAAD. Similarly to the results obtained on glass, AFM measurements of these surfaces show that the roughness does not change considerably upon modification (RMS roughness from 1.9 ± 0.5 nm to 2.0 ± 0.5 nm) (Table S2), which is another significant improvement over plasma-based oxidations.[21] Photolithography on open substrates was performed by positioning a contact mask (circular TEM grid with circles and spokes, Figure S3) on top of the COC-Si-Φ-H substrates during the light-induced hydrosilylation reaction. We then planned to visualize the resulting pattern by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Figure , Table S3).
Figure 5

(a) Photograph and (b) SEM image of a TFAAD-patterned COC-Si-Φ-H after exposure to DCM (30 min); (c, d) close-ups of the regions denoted by the dashed squares in b.

(a) Photograph and (b) SEM image of a TFAAD-patterned COC-Si-Φ-H after exposure to DCM (30 min); (c, d) close-ups of the regions denoted by the dashed squares in b. Interestingly, when cleaning the modified substrate with dichloromethane (DCM) for 5 min to allow for SEM measurements, we observed that the pattern had slowly become visible by naked eye. Further exposure to DCM (30 min) showed clear degradation by the solvent of the nonexposed areas, while the TFAAD-modified areas resisted solvent damage effectively (Figure a–d). Overall, the ability to covalently bind an ultrathin, yet highly protective coating that can be further modified,[37,40] opens the use of these substrates for many applications. We then finally proceeded to modify the channel of an already bonded COC microreactor (Micronit) into COC–OH by flowing the oxidation solution for 20 min at 50 μL/min and washing for 5 min (50 μL/min) with methanolic NaBH4. Silanization was carried out and a fully modified COC-Si-Φ-H microfluidic channel was photopatterned with TFAAD (see Supporting Information for details). We then tested the ability of the TFAAD patches to protect the device from a prolonged flow of DCM (30 min at 50 μL/min). As can be seen from Figure b, the coating provides significant protection even to harsh solvents such as DCM. In the absence of a protective coating (Figure b, c), the polymer swells and cracks, starting as stripe-like cracks at the side of the channel (Figure b). In addition, the bonding strength between the COC top and bottom substrates is severely weakened and leakage occurs. Since the TFAAD moiety is by no means optimized for this purpose, functional group optimization will likely provide significant possibilities for further improvement of the protection.
Figure 6

Microscope image of plastic microchip with (a) a TFAAD-modified COC channel; (b) a partially TFAAD-modified COC channel (the faint orange part on the left was coated; the right part is uncoated) after exposure to a flow of DCM (white arrow indicates flow direction; 50 μL/min; 30 min), showing significantly more damage in the uncoated part; (c) untreated COC submitted to the same treatment.

Microscope image of plastic microchip with (a) a TFAAD-modified COC channel; (b) a partially TFAAD-modified COC channel (the faint orange part on the left was coated; the right part is uncoated) after exposure to a flow of DCM (white arrow indicates flow direction; 50 μL/min; 30 min), showing significantly more damage in the uncoated part; (c) untreated COC submitted to the same treatment.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have demonstrated a mild aqueous C–H activation method to modify the surface of cyclic olefin copolymers (COC). This method can be applied to open plastic substrates as well as to bonded microchannels, and yields highly defined alcohol-terminated COC surfaces without carbonyl-containing moieties. Because of their nucleophilic character, such surface-bound alcohol moieties can be used for a very wide array of surface modifications. When, for example, reacted with hydrosilanes (such as Cl3Si–H or Cl2PhSi-H), this surface yields a hydrogen-terminated Si-COC surface. This new hybrid surface is highly stable in air and photopatternable via a mild light-induced hydrosilylation with terminal alkenes. The TFAAD functional monolayer attached in this fashion enhanced the resistance of the COC to organic solvents (e.g., DCM). In addition, TFAAD is well-known for its ability to undergo further surface modifications for, for example, biological applications.[37,40,41] This research opens a door toward the mild activation of what was considered a highly inert substrate that required harsh modification techniques. This technique is currently transposed to other C–H containing polymer analogues, e.g., polyphenyl ethers/oxides (PPEs/PPOs), and speeding up the process via the photochemical attachment of 1-silanols rather than 1-alkenes, which is ca. 2 orders of magnitude faster on H-terminated Si(111),[42] is also under investigation in our laboratories.
  27 in total

1.  Activation of Cminus signH Bonds by Metal Complexes.

Authors:  Alexander E. Shilov; Georgiy B. Shul'pin
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1997-12-18       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  The gif paradox.

Authors:  P Stavropoulos; R Celenligil-Cetin; A E Tapper
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  DNA-modified nanocrystalline diamond thin-films as stable, biologically active substrates.

Authors:  Wensha Yang; Orlando Auciello; James E Butler; Wei Cai; John A Carlisle; Jennifer E Gerbi; Dieter M Gruen; Tanya Knickerbocker; Tami L Lasseter; John N Russell; Lloyd M Smith; Robert J Hamers
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Surface patterning of bonded microfluidic channels.

Authors:  Craig Priest
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 5.  Biologically inspired oxidation catalysis.

Authors:  Lawrence Que; William B Tolman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  On-chip micropatterning of plastic (cylic olefin copolymer, COC) microfluidic channels for the fabrication of biomolecule microarrays using photografting methods.

Authors:  Qiaosheng Pu; Olufemi Oyesanya; Bowlin Thompson; Shantang Liu; Julio C Alvarez
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 3.882

7.  New family of fluorinated polymer chips for droplet and organic solvent microfluidics.

Authors:  Stefano Begolo; Guillaume Colas; Jean-Louis Viovy; Laurent Malaquin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  One-step photochemical attachment of NHS-terminated monolayers onto silicon surfaces and subsequent functionalization.

Authors:  Menglong Yang; Rosalie L M Teeuwen; Marcel Giesbers; Jacob Baggerman; Ahmed Arafat; Frits A de Wolf; Jan C M van Hest; Han Zuilhof
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  Photochemical grafting of n-alkenes onto carbon surfaces: the role of photoelectron ejection.

Authors:  Paula E Colavita; Bin Sun; Kiu-Yuen Tse; Robert J Hamers
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  UV-initiated hydrosilylation on hydrogen-terminated silicon (111): rate coefficient increase of two orders of magnitude in the presence of aromatic electron acceptors.

Authors:  Lawrence A Huck; Jillian M Buriak
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.