Edward Yelin1, Laura Trupin2, Jinoos Yazdany2. 1. University of California, San Francisco, and University of California, Berkeley. 2. University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of current poverty, number of years in poverty, and exiting poverty on disease damage accumulation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: For this study, 783 patients with SLE were followed up from 2003 to 2015 through annual structured interviews. Respondents were categorized in each year by whether they had a household income of ≤125% of the US federal poverty level. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of poverty in 2009, number of years in poverty between 2003 and 2009, and permanent exits from poverty as of 2009 on the extent of disease damage (according to the Brief Index of Lupus Damage [BILD] score) or accumulation of a clinically meaningful increase in disease damage (defined as a minimum 2-point increase in the BILD damage score) by 2015. RESULTS: After adjustment for sociodemographic features, health care characteristics, and health behaviors, poverty in 2009 was associated with an increased level of accumulated disease damage in 2015 (mean difference in BILD damage score between poor and non-poor 0.62 points, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.25-0.98) and increased odds of a clinically important increase in damage (odds ratio [OR] 1.67, 95% CI 0.98-2.85). Being poor in every year between 2003 and 2009 was associated with greater damage (mean change in BILD score 2.45, 95% CI 1.88-3.01) than being poor for one-half or more of those years (mean change in BILD score 1.45, 95% CI 0.97-1.93), for fewer than one-half of those years (mean change in BILD score 1.49, 95% CI 1.10-1.88), or for none of those years (mean change in BILD score 1.34, 95% CI 1.20-1.49). Those exiting poverty permanently had similar increases in disease damage (mean change in BILD score 1.30, 95% CI 0.90-1.69) as those who were never in poverty (mean change in BILD score 1.36, 95% CI 1.23-1.50) but much less damage than those who remained in poverty (mean change in BILD score 1.98, 95% CI 1.59-2.38). CONCLUSION: The effects of current poverty, "dose" of poverty, and exiting poverty suggest that poverty plays a critical role in the accumulation of damage in patients with SLE.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of current poverty, number of years in poverty, and exiting poverty on disease damage accumulation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: For this study, 783 patients with SLE were followed up from 2003 to 2015 through annual structured interviews. Respondents were categorized in each year by whether they had a household income of ≤125% of the US federal poverty level. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of poverty in 2009, number of years in poverty between 2003 and 2009, and permanent exits from poverty as of 2009 on the extent of disease damage (according to the Brief Index of Lupus Damage [BILD] score) or accumulation of a clinically meaningful increase in disease damage (defined as a minimum 2-point increase in the BILD damage score) by 2015. RESULTS: After adjustment for sociodemographic features, health care characteristics, and health behaviors, poverty in 2009 was associated with an increased level of accumulated disease damage in 2015 (mean difference in BILD damage score between poor and non-poor 0.62 points, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.25-0.98) and increased odds of a clinically important increase in damage (odds ratio [OR] 1.67, 95% CI 0.98-2.85). Being poor in every year between 2003 and 2009 was associated with greater damage (mean change in BILD score 2.45, 95% CI 1.88-3.01) than being poor for one-half or more of those years (mean change in BILD score 1.45, 95% CI 0.97-1.93), for fewer than one-half of those years (mean change in BILD score 1.49, 95% CI 1.10-1.88), or for none of those years (mean change in BILD score 1.34, 95% CI 1.20-1.49). Those exiting poverty permanently had similar increases in disease damage (mean change in BILD score 1.30, 95% CI 0.90-1.69) as those who were never in poverty (mean change in BILD score 1.36, 95% CI 1.23-1.50) but much less damage than those who remained in poverty (mean change in BILD score 1.98, 95% CI 1.59-2.38). CONCLUSION: The effects of current poverty, "dose" of poverty, and exiting poverty suggest that poverty plays a critical role in the accumulation of damage in patients with SLE.
Authors: E W Karlson; L H Daltroy; C Rivest; R Ramsey-Goldman; E A Wright; A J Partridge; M H Liang; P R Fortin Journal: Lupus Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: Laura Trupin; M Christine Tonner; Jinoos Yazdany; Laura J Julian; Lindsey A Criswell; Patricia P Katz; Edward Yelin Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Candace H Feldman; Karen H Costenbader; Daniel H Solomon; S V Subramanian; Ichiro Kawachi Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: David H Chae; Connor D Martz; Thomas E Fuller-Rowell; Erica C Spears; Tianqi Tenchi Gao Smith; Evelyn A Hunter; Cristina Drenkard; S Sam Lim Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Alfredo Aguirre; Zara Izadi; Laura Trupin; Kamil E Barbour; Kurt J Greenlund; Patti Katz; Cristina Lanata; Lindsey Criswell; Maria Dall'Era; Jinoos Yazdany Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 5.178
Authors: Connor D Martz; Evelyn A Hunter; Michael R Kramer; Yijie Wang; Kara Chung; Michael Brown; Cristina Drenkard; S Sam Lim; David H Chae Journal: Health Place Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 4.931
Authors: Patricia Katz; Maria Dall'Era; Laura Trupin; Stephanie Rush; Louise B Murphy; Cristina Lanata; Lindsey A Criswell; Jinoos Yazdany Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 5.178