Literature DB >> 28479889

Prevalence of geophagia and its contributing factors among pregnant women at Dr. George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Pretoria.

L R Macheka1, J O Olowoyo1, L Matsela2, A A Khine3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Geophagia is very common among pregnant women, particularly in Africa. There are many reasons given for geophagia such as cultural, medicinal and religious, making it an acceptable norm regardless of health risks involved.
OBJECTIVES: The study explored prevalence and factors influencing geophagia among women visiting an antenatal clinic in Pretoria.
METHODS: A quantitative survey was done on a convenience sample of 597 pregnant women and structured interviews conducted. Statistical analysis was done using simple percentage and interview data analyzed using Epi Info statistical software.
RESULTS: Geophagia was reported by 54.0% of the women (n=323) and of these, 75.2% (n=243) ate at least 3 teaspoons per day. Reasons for the practice ranged from simple unexplained craving to belief that soil acts as an iron supplement. The study revealed that education levels did not act as a contributing factor as both literate and illiterate women were consumers. Partners of consumers played a key role in influencing the practice as most consumers were not married.
CONCLUSION: Geophagia is practiced by a considerable proportion of pregnant women in this area. Greater vigilance may be needed as part of the antenatal classes to avoid potentially harmful effects of the habit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dr. George Mukhari Academic Hospital; Geophagia; Pretoria; pregnant women

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28479889      PMCID: PMC5398443          DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v16i4.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr Health Sci        ISSN: 1680-6905            Impact factor:   0.927


  13 in total

1.  Geophagy among primates: adaptive significance and ecological consequences.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  The scoop on eating dirt.

Authors:  Philip T B Starks; Brittany L Slabach
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.142

3.  Pica.

Authors:  W H Crosby
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A pica epidemic: a price for sedentarism among Australian ex-hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  H D Eastwell
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 2.458

5.  Relationship between pica and iron nutrition in Johannesburg Black adults.

Authors:  G Sayers; D A Lipschitz; M Sayers; H C Seftel; T H Bothwell; R W Charlton
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1974-08-14

6.  Pica in man and animals.

Authors:  N S Hyslop
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  Association of laundry starch and clay ingestion with anemia in New York City.

Authors:  H A Roselle
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1970-01

Review 8.  Why on earth?: Evaluating hypotheses about the physiological functions of human geophagy.

Authors:  Sera L Young; Paul W Sherman; Julius B Lucks; Gretel H Pelto
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 9.  Pica: common but commonly missed.

Authors:  E A Rose; J H Porcerelli; A V Neale
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

10.  Geohelminth Infections among pregnant women in rural western Kenya; a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anna M van Eijk; Kim A Lindblade; Frank Odhiambo; Elizabeth Peterson; Daniel H Rosen; Diana Karanja; John G Ayisi; Ya Ping Shi; Kubaje Adazu; Laurence Slutsker
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2009-01-27
View more
  7 in total

1.  Child, reproductive, mental health; infections and NCDs in the African environment.

Authors:  James K Tumwine
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 2.  Review of the nature of some geophagic materials and their potential health effects on pregnant women: some examples from Africa.

Authors:  Selma N Kambunga; Carla Candeias; Israel Hasheela; Hassina Mouri
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Not a Common Rectosigmoid Perforation.

Authors:  Rizwan Ishtiaq; Khurram Niaz; Darakshan Masood; Daniyal Ishtiaq; Shafay Yasin; Umer H Chaudhry; Anam Ashraf
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-07-13

4.  Potential health risk assessment of toxic metals contamination in clay eaten as pica (geophagia) among pregnant women of Ho in the Volta Region of Ghana.

Authors:  Nii Korley Kortei; Alice Koryo-Dabrah; Papa Toah Akonor; Nana Yaw Barimah Manaphraim; Matilda Ayim-Akonor; Nathaniel Owusu Boadi; Edward Ken Essuman; Clement Tettey
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Practices of pica among pregnant women in a tertiary healthcare facility in Ghana.

Authors:  Kennedy Diema Konlan; Juliana Asibi Abdulai; Kennedy Dodam Konlan; Roberta Mensima Amoah; Abdul-Razak Doat
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-01-28

6.  Geophagia: A case series.

Authors:  Ichpreet Singh; Pawel Singh; Prajakta Patkar; Suprakash Chaudhury; Daniel Saldanha
Journal:  Ind Psychiatry J       Date:  2021-10-22

7.  Concentrations of Pb and Other Associated Elements in Soil Dust 15 Years after the Introduction of Unleaded Fuel and the Human Health Implications in Pretoria, South Africa.

Authors:  Joshua O Olowoyo; Ntebo Lion; Tshoni Unathi; Oluwaseun M Oladeji
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.