Literature DB >> 28479776

Leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm mimicking ureteric colic: So rare but so real in Middle East.

Tanweer Ahmed Naveed Bhatty1, Qamar Saeed Chaudhry1, Ziauddin Khan1, Ahmed Nabeel Bastawicy1.   

Abstract

Aortic aneurysms are very rare in Middle East unlike Europe and America. Therefore, this pathology is very likely to be missed in acute presentation to the Emergency Medicine Department. We present a case of leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm mimicking right ureteric colic, which was missed in the initial assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute aortic dissection; Emergency Medical Department; computerized tomogram

Year:  2017        PMID: 28479776      PMCID: PMC5405668          DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.204177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Ann        ISSN: 0974-7796


INTRODUCTION

Aortic aneurysms are very rare in Middle East. Sometimes presentation is very close to ureteric colic, so they are likely to be missed. We present a case of leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm mimicking right ureteric colic, which was missed in the initial assessment. Our case report will help emergency physician and urologist to remember this life threatening condition as one of differential diagnosis in high risk patients.

CASE REPORT

A 61-year-old male Bahraini who was smoker and known case of hypertension and dyslipidemia, presented twice in the Emergency Medical Department (EMD), with acute right loin pain radiating to groin. Pain was moderate with a score of 5/10, continuous with little dysuria. In EMD, his blood pressure (BP) was 148/90 mmHg and varied between 118/66 and 179/148 mmHg during admission. His heart rate (HR) was 76/min. Rest of the vitals were stable. Examination was unremarkable. Creatinine was 124.7 μmol/L. His hemoglobin was 10.4 g/dl and remained stable. His white blood cell count was raised to 16.56 × 103/μL (range 3.6–9.6) and urine revealed 18–20 red blood cells. He was admitted with a provisional diagnosis of right ureteric colic. Noncontrast computerized tomogram (CT) was reported negative for urolithiasis, but positive findings were gallstones, enlarged left suprarenal gland with large retrocaval and paraaortic lymph nodes along with spondylolysis L4–L5 vertebra [Figure 1]. Hence, contrast CT was done which reported aortic aneurysm arising from right lateral wall of distal aorta measuring 2.5 cm × 2.5 cm with its neck measuring 1.1 cm associated with hyperdense area 5.6 cm × 5.4 cm × 3.2 cm on its right side with no active contrast extravasation along with left adrenal adenoma 1.2 cm in size along with paraaortic lymph node 2 cm in size [Figure 2a and b]. Vascular team was informed immediately and patient was shifted under their care with stable vital signs and BP of 129/80 mmHg and HR of 62/min.
Figure 1

Coronal view of computerized tomogram

Figure 2

(a) Reconstruction view. (b) With contrast

Coronal view of computerized tomogram (a) Reconstruction view. (b) With contrast

DISCUSSION

Incidence of acute aortic dissection (AAD) is 0.3% in patients attending EMD with complaint of back pain.[1] AAD is notorious for being missed as it can mimic many other acute conditions.[2] It can be missed in up to 38% patients on initial assessment and is found on postmortem examination in up to 28% of patients.[3] AAD is a life-threatening emergency and delay in diagnosis and treatment has serious consequences with very high mortality of 1–2%/h of delay.[4] The clinical predictors or risk factors are hypertension, Marfan syndrome, male sex, and advanced age.[5] Smoking is associated with 3–5 times increased risk of having aortic aneurysms.[6] There is no single diagnostic modality which can accurately diagnose AAD. However, contrast CT is the best with 92%–96% diagnostic accuracy.[7]

CONCLUSIONS

Leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm is very rare but a real possibility in Middle East as we have seen in our case. Even in western world, where it is more common, it is missed in about one-third of cases, resulting in a very high mortality. Hence, it must not be forgotten and should always be included in the differential diagnosis, especially if risk factors exist.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Acute aortic syndromes: Role of multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Luca Salvolini; Pietro Renda; Davide Fiore; Mariano Scaglione; GianPiero Piccoli; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Acute aortic dissection: perspectives from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD).

Authors:  T T Tsai; S Trimarchi; C A Nienaber
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 7.069

3.  Risk factors for diagnostic delay in acute aortic dissection.

Authors:  Claudio Rapezzi; Simone Longhi; Maddalena Graziosi; Elena Biagini; Francesca Terzi; Robin M T Cooke; Cristina Quarta; Diego Sangiorgi; Paolo Ciliberti; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Angelo Branzi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Diagnostic score to differentiate acute aortic dissection in the emergency room.

Authors:  Akihiro Shirakabe; Noritake Hata; Shinya Yokoyama; Takuro Shinada; Yuuichirou Suzuki; Nobuaki Kobayashi; Arifumi Kikuchi; Teruo Takano; Kyoichi Mizuno
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.993

5.  The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease.

Authors:  P G Hagan; C A Nienaber; E M Isselbacher; D Bruckman; D J Karavite; P L Russman; A Evangelista; R Fattori; T Suzuki; J K Oh; A G Moore; J F Malouf; L A Pape; C Gaca; U Sechtem; S Lenferink; H J Deutsch; H Diedrichs; J Marcos y Robles; A Llovet; D Gilon; S K Das; W F Armstrong; G M Deeb; K A Eagle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Craig Fleming; Evelyn P Whitlock; Tracy L Beil; Frank A Lederle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Clinical prediction of acute aortic dissection.

Authors:  Y von Kodolitsch; A G Schwartz; C A Nienaber
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.