Literature DB >> 18993163

Risk factors for diagnostic delay in acute aortic dissection.

Claudio Rapezzi1, Simone Longhi, Maddalena Graziosi, Elena Biagini, Francesca Terzi, Robin M T Cooke, Cristina Quarta, Diego Sangiorgi, Paolo Ciliberti, Giuseppe Di Pasquale, Angelo Branzi.   

Abstract

In acute aortic dissection (AAD), timely diagnosis is challenging. However, dedicated studies of the entity and determinants of delay are currently lacking. We surveyed pre-/in-hospital time to diagnosis and explored risk factors for diagnostic delay. We analyzed the dedicated database of a metropolitan AAD network (161 patients diagnosed since 1996; 115 Stanford type A) in terms of hospital arrival times (from pain to presentation at any hospital) and in-hospital diagnostic times (presentation to final diagnosis). Median (interquartile range) in-hospital diagnostic times were approximately twofold greater than hospital arrival times (177 minutes, 644, vs 75 minutes, 124, p = 0.0001, Wilcoxon test). Median annual in-hospital diagnostic times were most often approximately 3 hours (spread was wide, but decreased after 2001; rho = -0.94, p = 0.005). Risk factors (univariate analysis) for in-hospital diagnostic time >75th percentile (12 hours) included pleural effusion (odds ratio 3.96, 95% confidence interval 1.80 to 8.69), dyspneic presentation (odds ratio 3.33, 95% confidence interval 1.93 to 8.59), and age <70 years (odds ratio 2.34, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 5.36). Systolic arterial pressure < or =105 mm Hg decreased the likelihood of lengthy diagnosis (odds ratio 0.08, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.59). In patients (n = 82) with routine values (since 2000), troponin positivity (odds ratio 3.63, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 11.84) and an acute coronary syndrome-like electrocardiogram (odds ratio 2.88, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 8.17) were also risk factors. In conclusion, in a metropolitan setting, most of the diagnostic delay may occur in hospital. At presentation, pleural effusion, troponin positivity, acute coronary syndrome-like electrocardiogram, and dyspnea are possible "clinical confounders" associated with particularly long in-hospital diagnostic times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18993163     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  17 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of acute aortic syndromes in the emergency department.

Authors:  Fulvio Morello; Marco Santoro; Aaron Thomas Fargion; Stefano Grifoni; Peiman Nazerian
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Age-specific 99th percentile cutoff of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T for early prediction of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in middle-aged patients.

Authors:  Lie Ying Fan; Ping Yu; Shan Shan Yu; Yu Ying Gu; Ming Zong; Ying Cai; Zhong Min Liu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  The risk of stanford type-A aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Minjia Zhu; Yu Chang; Huanyu Qiao; Yongmin Liu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Acute type a aortic dissection: for further improvement of outcomes.

Authors:  Kazumasa Orihashi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2012

5.  Re-visiting D-dimers and fibrin degradation products for the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.

Authors:  Chwan-Yau Luo; Jun-Neng Roan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Serum Ceruloplasmin Is the Candidate Predictive Biomarker for Acute Aortic Dissection and Is Related to Thrombosed False Lumen: a Propensity Score-Matched Observational Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Changcheng Ma; Haibin Zhao; Feng Shi; Mu Li; Xun Liu; Chao Ji; Yanshuo Han
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  Malperfusion syndromes in type A aortic dissection: what we have learned from IRAD.

Authors:  Paolo Berretta; Santi Trimarchi; Himanshu J Patel; Thomas G Gleason; Kim A Eagle; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-31

8.  The frequency of initial misdiagnosis of acute aortic dissection in the emergency department and its impact on outcome.

Authors:  Leili Pourafkari; Arezou Tajlil; Samad Ghaffari; Rezayat Parvizi; Mohammadreza Chavoshi; Kasra Kolahdouzan; Nasrin Khaki; Raziyeh Parizad; Geoffery G Hobika; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Ischemia-modified albumin in acute aortic dissection.

Authors:  Eftihia Sbarouni; Panagiota Georgiadou; Aikaterini Marathias; Demosthenes Panagiotakos; Stefanos Geroulanos; Vassilis Voudris
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

10.  Endovascular treatment of complex diseases of the thoracic aorta-10 years single centre experience.

Authors:  Piotr Buczkowski; Mateusz Puślecki; Natalia Majewska; Tomasz Urbanowicz; Marcin Misterski; Robert Juszkat; Jerzy Kulesza; Bartosz Żabicki; Sebastian Stefaniak; Marcin Ligowski; Lukasz Szarpak; Marek Jemielity; Eva Rivas; Kurt Ruetzler; Bartłomiej Perek
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.