Literature DB >> 28478138

Salutary effects of an attention bias modification mobile application on biobehavioral measures of stress and anxiety during pregnancy.

Tracy A Dennis-Tiwary1, Samantha Denefrio2, Shari Gelber3.   

Abstract

Stress and anxiety during pregnancy are associated with a range of adverse health outcomes, but there is an unmet need for low-barrier treatments that target stress and anxiety. One such treatment approach, attention bias modification training (ABMT), targets the anxiety-related threat bias, a disruption in attention to and neural processing of threat-related information. It remains unclear, however, whether reducing treatment barriers via mobile delivery of ABMT is effective and whether ABMT efficacy varies depending on individual differences in neural processing of threat. The present study tested whether mobile, gamified ABMT reduced prenatal threat bias, anxiety and stress, and whether ABMT efficacy varied with individual differences in neural responses to threat. Participants were 29 women in their 19th-29th week of pregnancy, randomized to four weeks of an ABMT or placebo training (PT) version of the mobile app using a double-blind design. Self-report of anxiety, depression, and stress were obtained; salivary cortisol was collected at home and in lab in response to stressors to index biological stress reactivity. Threat bias was measured using a computerized attention assay during which EEG was recorded to generate event-related potentials (ERPs) to threat cues. Results showed lower levels of lab cortisol following ABMT versus PT. Although the main effect of ABMT on subjective anxiety was not significant, the magnitude of cortisol reduction was correlated with lower levels of subjective anxiety and threat bias. Those receiving ABMT also reported less anxiety when showing smaller ERPs to threat (P1, P2) prior to training, but, conversely reported more anxiety when showing larger ERPs to threat. Use of gamified, mobile ABMT reduced biobehavioral indices of prenatal stress and anxiety, but effects on anxiety varied with individual differences in cortisol response and neurocognitive indices of early attention to threat.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28478138      PMCID: PMC5593765          DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  63 in total

1.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components.

Authors:  S J Luck; H J Heinze; G R Mangun; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-06

Review 2.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; L Anllo-Vento
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Interventions and Models of Their Delivery to Reduce the Burden of Mental Illness: Reply to Commentaries.

Authors:  Alan E Kazdin; Stacey L Blase
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-09

4.  Clinical efficacy of attentional bias modification procedures: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Mogoaşe; Daniel David; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2014-03-20

5.  The 'Trier Social Stress Test'--a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting.

Authors:  C Kirschbaum; K M Pirke; D H Hellhammer
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.328

6.  The effectiveness of an attention bias modification program as an adjunctive treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

Authors:  Jennie M Kuckertz; Nader Amir; Joseph W Boffa; Ciara K Warren; Susan E M Rindt; Sonya Norman; Vasudha Ram; Lauretta Ziajko; Jennifer Webb-Murphy; Robert McLay
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2014-09-16

7.  Disruptive innovations for designing and diffusing evidence-based interventions.

Authors:  Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus; Dallas Swendeman; Bruce F Chorpita
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2012-04-30

Review 8.  Maternal stress and obstetric and infant outcomes: epidemiological findings and neuroendocrine mechanisms.

Authors:  M P Austin; L Leader
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 9.  Pooled patient-level meta-analysis of children and adults completing a computer-based anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias.

Authors:  Rebecca B Price; Meredith Wallace; Jennie M Kuckertz; Nader Amir; Simona Graur; Logan Cummings; Paul Popa; Per Carlbring; Yair Bar-Haim
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-09-20

10.  Attentional retraining: a randomized clinical trial for pathological worry.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hazen; Michael W Vasey; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.791

View more
  10 in total

1.  The efficacy of app-supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jake Linardon; Pim Cuijpers; Per Carlbring; Mariel Messer; Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 2.  Attention and Cognitive Bias Modification Apps: Review of the Literature and of Commercially Available Apps.

Authors:  Melvyn Zhang; JiangBo Ying; Guo Song; Daniel Ss Fung; Helen Smith
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Gamified Cognitive Bias Interventions for Psychiatric Disorders: Protocol of a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Melvyn Zhang; Jiangbo Ying; Roger Cm Ho
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-10-16

4.  Training Cognitive Functions Using Mobile Apps in Breast Cancer Patients: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Laura Vergani; Giulia Marton; Silvia Francesca Maria Pizzoli; Dario Monzani; Ketti Mazzocco; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 5.  A systematic review of mHealth application interventions for peripartum mood disorders: trends and evidence in academia and industry.

Authors:  Natalie Feldman; Diana Back; Robert Boland; John Torous
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Effects of mHealth on the psychosocial health of pregnant women and mothers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Lisa Sakamoto; Rogie Royce Carandang; Madhu Kharel; Akira Shibanuma; Ekaterina Yarotskaya; Milana Basargina; Masamine Jimba
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  eHealth Interventions for Treatment and Prevention of Depression, Anxiety, and Insomnia During Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katherine A Silang; Pooja R Sohal; Katherine S Bright; Jennifer Leason; Leslie Roos; Catherine Lebel; Gerald F Giesbrecht; Lianne M Tomfohr-Madsen
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2022-02-21

8.  Detection of Potential Arbovirus Infections and Pregnancy Complications in Pregnant Women in Jamaica Using a Smartphone App (ZIKApp): Pilot Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Elisa Ruiz-Burga; Patricia Bruijning-Verhagen; Paulette Palmer; Annalisa Sandcroft; Georgina Fernandes; Marieke de Hoog; Lenroy Bryan; Russell Pierre; Heather Bailey; Carlo Giaquinto; Claire Thorne; Celia D C Christie
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-07-27

9.  Mobile Phone Cognitive Bias Modification Research Platform for Substance Use Disorders: Protocol for a Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Melvyn Zhang; JiangBo Ying; Guo Song; Daniel Ss Fung; Helen Smith
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-06-12

10.  A Smartphone Attention Bias Intervention for Individuals With Addictive Disorders: Protocol for a Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Melvyn Zhang; Jiangbo Ying; Syidda B Amron; Zaakira Mahreen; Guo Song; Daniel Ss Fung; Helen Smith
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-11-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.