Literature DB >> 18722627

Attentional retraining: a randomized clinical trial for pathological worry.

Rebecca A Hazen1, Michael W Vasey, Norman B Schmidt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research has consistently shown that highly anxious individuals tend to show an attentional bias in favor of threat cues (i.e., a threat bias). Further, recent evidence suggests that it is possible to modify patterns of attention allocation for such stimuli and the resulting changes in attention allocation alter affective responses to stress. However, to date such changes in patterns of attention have been shown only over brief time intervals and only in non-anxious individuals who lack a pre-existing attentional bias. In contrast, the present study tested the efficacy of such attentional training in a sample of severe worriers over an extended period of time using psychometrically validated measures of anxiety and depression.
METHOD: Twenty-four adult participants reporting severe worry were randomly assigned to receive five sessions of either computer-delivered attentional retraining or sham training. The study was conducted from January to August 2001 and June to August 2002.
RESULTS: Significant Treatment Group X Time interactions were found for both threat bias (p=001) and a composite measure of anxious and depressive symptoms (p=.002). Compared to sham-training, the active retraining program produced significant reductions in both threat bias and symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the view that an attentional bias in favor of threat cues is an important causal factor in generalized anxiety and suggest that a computer-based attentional retraining procedure may be an effective component of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18722627     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  34 in total

Review 1.  The modification of attentional bias to emotional information: A review of the techniques, mechanisms, and relevance to emotional disorders.

Authors:  Michael Browning; Emily A Holmes; Catherine J Harmer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Negative affectivity, effortful control, and attention to threat-relevant stimuli.

Authors:  Christopher J Lonigan; Michael W Vasey
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-04

3.  Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders.

Authors:  Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff; Michael W Vasey; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  Unreliability as a threat to understanding psychopathology: The cautionary tale of attentional bias.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Rachel B Scullin; Julia K Langer; David J Dixon; Jonathan D Huppert; Amit Bernstein; Ariel Zvielli; Eric J Lenze
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2016-06-20

Review 5.  The Sociopharmacology of Tobacco Addiction: Implications for Understanding Health Disparities.

Authors:  Adam M Leventhal
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Attention Bias Modification Treatment for children with anxiety disorders who do not respond to cognitive behavioral therapy: a case series.

Authors:  Michele Bechor; Jeremy W Pettit; Wendy K Silverman; Yair Bar-Haim; Rany Abend; Daniel S Pine; Michael W Vasey; James Jaccard
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2013-09-16

Review 7.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

8.  Information processing bias and pharmacotherapy outcome in older adults with generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Amanda R W Steiner; Andrew J Petkus; Hoang Nguyen; Julie Loebach Wetherell
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2012-11-21

9.  The impact of worry on attention to threat.

Authors:  Desmond J Oathes; Christian M Squillante; William J Ray; Jack B Nitschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Courtney Beard; Alice T Sawyer; Stefan G Hofmann
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2012-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.