Neil P Jones1, Jay C Fournier2, Lindsey B Stone2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, 3811 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA 15216, USA. Electronic address: jonesnp@upmc.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, 3811 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA 15216, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Analytical rumination can be characterized as negative thoughts focused on searching for answers to personal problems. Failure to think concretely during autobiographical problem-solving (APS) is hypothesized to drive the inability of ruminators to generate effective solutions. Clarifying the brain correlates underlying APS deficits in depressed ruminators may identify novel biological targets for treatment. METHOD: Forty participants (22 unmedicated depressed and 18 never-depressed adults) ranging in rumination engaged in APS and negative self-referential processing (NSP) of negative trait adjectives during fMRI. We contrasted activation during APS with activation during NSP to isolate regions contributing to APS. RESULTS: Rumination was associated with having generated fewer solutions during APS and with a failure to recruit the angular gyrus (AG) and the medial frontal gyrus (MFG) during APS. Rumination was associated with greater MFG activation during NSP and stronger connectivity between the AG and the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) during APS relative to NSP. Findings were not driven by clinical status. LIMITATIONS: The use of an extreme groups approach can result in overestimation of effects sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Ruminators fail to recruit regions with the default network (DN) that support APS. In particular, a failure to recruit the AG during APS may drive the abstract thinking style previously shown to explain depressed ruminator's difficulty generating concrete solutions. Targeting this mechanism directly may reduce rumination.
BACKGROUND: Analytical rumination can be characterized as negative thoughts focused on searching for answers to personal problems. Failure to think concretely during autobiographical problem-solving (APS) is hypothesized to drive the inability of ruminators to generate effective solutions. Clarifying the brain correlates underlying APS deficits in depressed ruminators may identify novel biological targets for treatment. METHOD: Forty participants (22 unmedicated depressed and 18 never-depressed adults) ranging in rumination engaged in APS and negative self-referential processing (NSP) of negative trait adjectives during fMRI. We contrasted activation during APS with activation during NSP to isolate regions contributing to APS. RESULTS: Rumination was associated with having generated fewer solutions during APS and with a failure to recruit the angular gyrus (AG) and the medial frontal gyrus (MFG) during APS. Rumination was associated with greater MFG activation during NSP and stronger connectivity between the AG and the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) during APS relative to NSP. Findings were not driven by clinical status. LIMITATIONS: The use of an extreme groups approach can result in overestimation of effects sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Ruminators fail to recruit regions with the default network (DN) that support APS. In particular, a failure to recruit the AG during APS may drive the abstract thinking style previously shown to explain depressed ruminator's difficulty generating concrete solutions. Targeting this mechanism directly may reduce rumination.
Authors: Sander M Daselaar; Heather J Rice; Daniel L Greenberg; Roberto Cabeza; Kevin S LaBar; David C Rubin Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2007-06-04 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: R Nathan Spreng; W Dale Stevens; Jon P Chamberlain; Adrian W Gilmore; Daniel L Schacter Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Aaron Kucyi; Massieh Moayedi; Irit Weissman-Fogel; Michael B Goldberg; Bruce V Freeman; Howard C Tenenbaum; Karen D Davis Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Krzysztof J Gorgolewski; Dan Lurie; Sebastian Urchs; Judy A Kipping; R Cameron Craddock; Michael P Milham; Daniel S Margulies; Jonathan Smallwood Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lícia P Pereira; Cristiano A Köhler; Brendon Stubbs; Kamilla W Miskowiak; Gerwyn Morris; Bárbara P de Freitas; Trevor Thompson; Brisa S Fernandes; André R Brunoni; Michael Maes; Diego A Pizzagalli; André F Carvalho Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Emily R Stern; Goi Khia Eng; Alessandro S De Nadai; Dan V Iosifescu; Russell H Tobe; Katherine A Collins Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 7.989
Authors: David Rosenbaum; Paula Hilsendegen; Mara Thomas; Florian B Haeussinger; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Andreas J Fallgatter; Vanessa Nieratschker; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Florian G Metzger Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 4.379