Jan C Purrucker1, Timolaos Rizos1, Kirsten Haas2, Marcel Wolf3, Shujah Khan1, Peter U Heuschmann2,4,5, Roland Veltkamp6,7. 1. Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. 2. Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. 3. Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. 5. Clinical Trial Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. 6. Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. r.veltkamp@imperial.ac.uk. 7. Department of Stroke Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK. r.veltkamp@imperial.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening complication of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). Little is known about the effect of intensity of anticoagulation on NOAC-ICH. We describe the current use of coagulation testing in the emergency setting and explore associations with baseline size and expansion of hematoma as determined in a previous study. METHODS: Data from the prospective multicenter RASUNOA registry were analyzed. Patients with NOAC-ICH were enrolled between February 2012 and December 2014. Frequency of local test performance of specific (anti-factor Xa tests, diluted thrombin time) and non-specific tests (international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time) was analyzed. The association of anticoagulation intensity at admission with hematoma volume and hematoma expansion was explored. RESULTS: In 61 NOAC-ICH patients enrolled at 21 centers, drug-specific coagulation testing was performed in 16 cases (26%), and only 29% of centers appeared to use drug-specific tests in NOAC-ICH at all. In some cases, INR and aPTT values were normal despite drug concentrations in the peak range. In patients with available drug-specific concentrations, 50% had drug levels in the peak range at admission. Higher intensity of anticoagulation was not associated with higher hematoma volume at admission or with subsequent hematoma expansion. CONCLUSION: Drug-specific tests are only infrequently used in NOAC-ICH. Normal results in non-specific coagulation do not reliably rule out peak range concentrations. Anticoagulation intensity at admission does not predict baseline hematoma volume or subsequent hematoma expansion.
BACKGROUND:Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a life-threatening complication of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). Little is known about the effect of intensity of anticoagulation on NOAC-ICH. We describe the current use of coagulation testing in the emergency setting and explore associations with baseline size and expansion of hematoma as determined in a previous study. METHODS: Data from the prospective multicenter RASUNOA registry were analyzed. Patients with NOAC-ICH were enrolled between February 2012 and December 2014. Frequency of local test performance of specific (anti-factor Xa tests, diluted thrombin time) and non-specific tests (international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time) was analyzed. The association of anticoagulation intensity at admission with hematoma volume and hematoma expansion was explored. RESULTS: In 61 NOAC-ICHpatients enrolled at 21 centers, drug-specific coagulation testing was performed in 16 cases (26%), and only 29% of centers appeared to use drug-specific tests in NOAC-ICH at all. In some cases, INR and aPTT values were normal despite drug concentrations in the peak range. In patients with available drug-specific concentrations, 50% had drug levels in the peak range at admission. Higher intensity of anticoagulation was not associated with higher hematoma volume at admission or with subsequent hematoma expansion. CONCLUSION: Drug-specific tests are only infrequently used in NOAC-ICH. Normal results in non-specific coagulation do not reliably rule out peak range concentrations. Anticoagulation intensity at admission does not predict baseline hematoma volume or subsequent hematoma expansion.
Authors: Paul A Reilly; Thorsten Lehr; Sebastian Haertter; Stuart J Connolly; Salim Yusuf; John W Eikelboom; Michael D Ezekowitz; Gerhard Nehmiz; Susan Wang; Lars Wallentin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-09-27 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Charles V Pollack; Paul A Reilly; John Eikelboom; Stephan Glund; Peter Verhamme; Richard A Bernstein; Robert Dubiel; Menno V Huisman; Elaine M Hylek; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Jörg Kreuzer; Jerrold H Levy; Frank W Sellke; Joachim Stangier; Thorsten Steiner; Bushi Wang; Chak-Wah Kam; Jeffrey I Weitz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stuart J Connolly; Truman J Milling; John W Eikelboom; C Michael Gibson; John T Curnutte; Alex Gold; Michele D Bronson; Genmin Lu; Pamela B Conley; Peter Verhamme; Jeannot Schmidt; Saskia Middeldorp; Alexander T Cohen; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Pierre Albaladejo; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Shelly Goodman; Janet Leeds; Brian L Wiens; Deborah M Siegal; Elena Zotova; Brandi Meeks; Juliet Nakamya; W Ting Lim; Mark Crowther Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M L Flaherty; H Tao; M Haverbusch; P Sekar; D Kleindorfer; B Kissela; P Khatri; B Stettler; O Adeoye; C J Moomaw; J P Broderick; D Woo Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jan C Purrucker; Kirsten Haas; Timolaos Rizos; Shujah Khan; Marcel Wolf; Michael G Hennerici; Sven Poli; Christoph Kleinschnitz; Thorsten Steiner; Peter U Heuschmann; Roland Veltkamp Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 18.302