BACKGROUND: Among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), warfarin use before onset leads to greater mortality. In a retrospective study, we sought to determine whether warfarin use is associated with larger initial hematoma volume, one determinant of mortality after ICH. METHODS: We identified all patients hospitalized with ICH in the Greater Cincinnati region from January through December 2005. ICH volumes were measured on the first available brain scan by using the abc/2 method. Univariable analyses and a multivariable generalized linear model were used to determine whether international normalized ratio (INR) influenced initial ICH volume after adjusting for other factors, including age, race, sex, antiplatelet use, hemorrhage location, and time from stroke onset to scan. RESULTS: There were 258 patients with ICH, including 51 patients taking warfarin. In univariable comparison, when INR was stratified, there was a trend toward a difference in hematoma volume by INR category (INR <1.2, 13.4 mL; INR 1.2-2.0, 9.3 mL; INR 2.1-3.0, 14.0 mL; INR >3.0, 33.2 mL; p = 0.10). In the model, compared with patients with INR <1.2, there was no difference in hematoma size for patients with INR 1.2-2.0 (p = 0.25) or INR 2.1-3.0 (p = 0.36), but patients with INR >3.0 had greater hematoma volume (p = 0.02). Other predictors of larger hematoma size were ICH location (lobar compared with deep cerebral, p = 0.02) and shorter time from stroke onset to scan (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Warfarin use was associated with larger initial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume, but this effect was only observed for INR values >3.0. Larger ICH volume among warfarin users likely accounts for part of the excess mortality in this group.
BACKGROUND: Among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), warfarin use before onset leads to greater mortality. In a retrospective study, we sought to determine whether warfarin use is associated with larger initial hematoma volume, one determinant of mortality after ICH. METHODS: We identified all patients hospitalized with ICH in the Greater Cincinnati region from January through December 2005. ICH volumes were measured on the first available brain scan by using the abc/2 method. Univariable analyses and a multivariable generalized linear model were used to determine whether international normalized ratio (INR) influenced initial ICH volume after adjusting for other factors, including age, race, sex, antiplatelet use, hemorrhage location, and time from stroke onset to scan. RESULTS: There were 258 patients with ICH, including 51 patients taking warfarin. In univariable comparison, when INR was stratified, there was a trend toward a difference in hematoma volume by INR category (INR <1.2, 13.4 mL; INR 1.2-2.0, 9.3 mL; INR 2.1-3.0, 14.0 mL; INR >3.0, 33.2 mL; p = 0.10). In the model, compared with patients with INR <1.2, there was no difference in hematoma size for patients with INR 1.2-2.0 (p = 0.25) or INR 2.1-3.0 (p = 0.36), but patients with INR >3.0 had greater hematoma volume (p = 0.02). Other predictors of larger hematoma size were ICH location (lobar compared with deep cerebral, p = 0.02) and shorter time from stroke onset to scan (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION:Warfarin use was associated with larger initial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume, but this effect was only observed for INR values >3.0. Larger ICH volume among warfarin users likely accounts for part of the excess mortality in this group.
Authors: M L Flaherty; M Haverbusch; P Sekar; B Kissela; D Kleindorfer; C J Moomaw; L Sauerbeck; A Schneider; J P Broderick; D Woo Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-04-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S M Davis; J Broderick; M Hennerici; N C Brun; M N Diringer; S A Mayer; K Begtrup; T Steiner Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-04-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M L Flaherty; B Kissela; D Woo; D Kleindorfer; K Alwell; P Sekar; C J Moomaw; M Haverbusch; J P Broderick Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-01-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Thorsten Steiner; Michael N Diringer; Dietmar Schneider; Stephan A Mayer; Kamilla Begtrup; Joseph Broderick; Brett E Skolnick; Stephen M Davis Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Ryan Wada; Richard I Aviv; Allan J Fox; Demetrios J Sahlas; David J Gladstone; George Tomlinson; Sean P Symons Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-02-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Matthew L Flaherty; Mary Haverbusch; Padmini Sekar; Brett M Kissela; Dawn Kleindorfer; Charles J Moomaw; Joseph P Broderick; Daniel Woo Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Javier M Romero; Jeremy J Heit; Josser E Delgado Almandoz; Joshua N Goldstein; Jingjing Lu; Elkan Halpern; Steven M Greenberg; Jonathan Rosand; R Gilberto Gonzalez Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2012-01-22
Authors: Santiago R Leal-Noval; Manuel Muñoz; Marisol Asuero; Enric Contreras; José A García-Erce; Juan V Llau; Victoria Moral; José A Páramo; Manuel Quintana Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2013-06-17 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Karl Lindberg; Angelica Kouti; Doerthe Ziegelitz; Tobias Hallén; Thomas Skoglund; Dan Farahmand Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2018-01-19
Authors: Wesley R Zemrak; Kathryn E Smith; Stephen S Rolfe; Teresa May; Robert L Trowbridge; Timothy L Hayes; Gene A Grindlinger; David B Seder Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: D Andrew Wilkinson; Aditya S Pandey; B Gregory Thompson; Richard F Keep; Ya Hua; Guohua Xi Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Matthew L Flaherty; Opeolu Adeoye; Padmini Sekar; Mary Haverbusch; Charles J Moomaw; Haiyang Tao; Joseph P Broderick; Daniel Woo Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-03-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Taku Inohara; Ying Xian; Li Liang; Roland A Matsouaka; Jeffrey L Saver; Eric E Smith; Lee H Schwamm; Mathew J Reeves; Adrian F Hernandez; Deepak L Bhatt; Eric D Peterson; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 56.272