Clare Minahan1,2, Marina Melnikoff3, Karlee Quinn3,4,5, Brianna Larsen3,4,5. 1. Griffith Sports Physiology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. c.minahan@griffith.edu.au. 2. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. c.minahan@griffith.edu.au. 3. Griffith Sports Physiology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. 4. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. 5. Queensland Academy of Sport, Centre of Excellence for Applied Sport Science Research, Nathan, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the response of long-term oral contraceptive users (WomenOC; n = 8) to naturally menstruating women (WomenNM; n = 8) at rest and during exercise in temperate (TEMP; 22 °C) and hot (HEAT; 35 °C) conditions. METHODS: Participants performed a three-stage cycling trial in each condition at 90, 135, and 180% of lactate threshold 1 (total = 52.5 min). Heart rate (HR) and core temperature (T c) were recorded continuously, whereas blood pressure (BP), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), blood lactate [La-], and skin blood flow (BFsk) were recorded every 7.5 min. RESULTS: Baseline T c was higher in WomenOC (37.5 ± 0.2, 37.6 ± 0.3 °C) than WomenNM (37.2 ± 0.2, 37.0 ± 0.4 °C) before the TEMP (p = 0.03) and HEAT (p < 0.01) trials, respectively. This difference remained for 22.5 min into both trials (p ≤ 0.05), after which time no between-group differences were found (p > 0.05). BFsk measured in WomenNM plateaued from 7.5 min in the HEAT, whereas BFsk measured in WomenOC increased for 15.0 min (p = 0.02) before plateauing. There were no between-group differences in HR, BP, or blood [La-] before or throughout either trial (p > 0.05). WomenOC had higher (p ≤ 0.04) RPE values than WomenNM in the HEAT, reporting 8 ± 1 and 6 ± 2 at the end of Stage 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: WomenOC concluded both trials with a comparable T c to WomenNM, but had a prolonged BFsk response and elevated RPE in the HEAT. Changes to BFsk and RPE observed in women using OC may have implications for exercise tolerance in hot conditions.
PURPOSE: To compare the response of long-term oral contraceptive users (WomenOC; n = 8) to naturally menstruating women (WomenNM; n = 8) at rest and during exercise in temperate (TEMP; 22 °C) and hot (HEAT; 35 °C) conditions. METHODS:Participants performed a three-stage cycling trial in each condition at 90, 135, and 180% of lactate threshold 1 (total = 52.5 min). Heart rate (HR) and core temperature (T c) were recorded continuously, whereas blood pressure (BP), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), blood lactate [La-], and skin blood flow (BFsk) were recorded every 7.5 min. RESULTS: Baseline T c was higher in WomenOC (37.5 ± 0.2, 37.6 ± 0.3 °C) than WomenNM (37.2 ± 0.2, 37.0 ± 0.4 °C) before the TEMP (p = 0.03) and HEAT (p < 0.01) trials, respectively. This difference remained for 22.5 min into both trials (p ≤ 0.05), after which time no between-group differences were found (p > 0.05). BFsk measured in WomenNM plateaued from 7.5 min in the HEAT, whereas BFsk measured in WomenOC increased for 15.0 min (p = 0.02) before plateauing. There were no between-group differences in HR, BP, or blood [La-] before or throughout either trial (p > 0.05). WomenOC had higher (p ≤ 0.04) RPE values than WomenNM in the HEAT, reporting 8 ± 1 and 6 ± 2 at the end of Stage 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: WomenOC concluded both trials with a comparable T c to WomenNM, but had a prolonged BFsk response and elevated RPE in the HEAT. Changes to BFsk and RPE observed in women using OC may have implications for exercise tolerance in hot conditions.
Authors: Tze-Huan Lei; Stephen R Stannard; Blake G Perry; Zachary J Schlader; James D Cotter; Toby Mündel Journal: J Physiol Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Dan P Stephens; Lee Ann T Bennett; Ken Aoki; Wojciech A Kosiba; Nisha Charkoudian; John M Johnson Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Kirsty J Elliott-Sale; Kelly L McNulty; Paul Ansdell; Stuart Goodall; Kirsty M Hicks; Kevin Thomas; Paul A Swinton; Eimear Dolan Journal: Sports Med Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Kirsty J Elliott-Sale; Clare L Minahan; Xanne A K Janse de Jonge; Kathryn E Ackerman; Sarianna Sipilä; Naama W Constantini; Constance M Lebrun; Anthony C Hackney Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 11.136