Literature DB >> 28476485

Addiction as a BAD, a Behavioral Allocation Disorder.

R J Lamb1, Brett C Ginsburg2.   

Abstract

Addiction is continued drug use despite its harm. As one always has alternatives, addiction can be construed as a decision to allocate behavior to drug use. While decision making is commonly discussed and studied as if it resulted from deliberative, evaluative processes, such processes are actually only rarely involved in behavior allocation. These deliberative processes are too slow, effortful and inefficient to guide behavior other than when necessary. Rather, most actions are guided by faster, more automatic processes, often labeled habits. Habits are mostly adaptive, and result from repeated reinforcement leading to over-learned behavior. Habitual behavior occurs rapidly in response to particular contexts, and the behavior occurring first is that which occurs, i.e., the behavior that is decided upon. Thus, as drug use becomes habitual, drug use is likely to be chosen over other available activities in that particular context. However, while drug use becoming habitual is necessary for addiction to develop, it is not sufficient. Typically, constraints limit even habitual drug use to safer levels. These constraints might include limiting occasions for use; and, almost always, constraints on amount consumed. However, in a minority of individuals, drug use is not sufficiently constrained and addiction develops. This review discusses the nature of these constraints, and how they might fail. These failures do not result from abnormal learning processes, but rather unfortunate interactions between a person and their environment over time. These accumulate in the maladaptive allocation of behavior to drug use. This Behavior Allocation Disorder (BAD) can be reversed; occasionally easily when the environment significantly changes, but more often by the arduous application of deliberative processes generally absent from decision making. These deliberative processes must continue until new more adaptive habits become the most probable behavior in the contexts encountered. As alternatives to drug use become the most probable behavior, relapse risk diminishes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcoholism; Choice; Decision making; Habits; Type I thinking

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28476485      PMCID: PMC6089073          DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2017.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  85 in total

Review 1.  Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal.

Authors:  W K Bickel; L A Marsch; M E Carroll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Relative reinforcing effects of different oral ethanol doses in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Robert B Stewart; Nian-Sheng Wang; April A Bass; Richard A Meisch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral effects of self-administered cocaine: responding maintained alternately by cocaine and electric shock in squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  R D Spealman; R T Kelleher
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Quantitative trait loci affecting ethanol sensitivity in BXD recombinant inbred mice.

Authors:  K E Browman; J C Crabbe
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  The demand for alcohol: the differential response to price.

Authors:  W G Manning; L Blumberg; L H Moulton
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Facilitation of human tobacco self-administration by ethanol: a behavioral analysis.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; G E Bigelow; I Liebson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The relation between number of smoking friends, and quit intentions, attempts, and success: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  Sara C Hitchman; Geoffrey T Fong; Mark P Zanna; James F Thrasher; Fritz L Laux
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2014-05-19

8.  Drug use by U.S. Army enlisted men in Vietnam: a follow-up on their return home.

Authors:  L N Robins; D H Davis; D W Goodwin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Toward a nonhuman model of contingency management: effects of reinforcing abstinence from nicotine self-administration in rats with an alternative nondrug reinforcer.

Authors:  Mark G Lesage
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Delay discounting of food and remifentanil in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  David R Maguire; Lisa R Gerak; Charles P France
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral economic demand as a unifying language for addiction science: Promoting collaboration and integration of animal and human models.

Authors:  Justin C Strickland; Ryan T Lacy
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Heroin choice depends on income level and economy type.

Authors:  Tommy Gunawan; Yosuke Hachiga; Christopher S Tripoli; Alan Silberberg; David N Kearns
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Conditioned Stimulus Form Does Not Explain Failures to See Pavlovian-Instrumental-Transfer With Ethanol-Paired Conditioned Stimuli.

Authors:  Richard J Lamb; Brett C Ginsburg; Charles W Schindler
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  When Triggers Become Tigers: Taming the Autonomic Nervous System via Sensory Support System Modulation.

Authors:  Holly C Matto; Padmanabhan Seshaiyer; Stephanie Carmack; Nathalia Peixoto; Matthew Scherbel
Journal:  J Soc Work Pract Addict       Date:  2021-09-07

5.  Reinforcing effects of opioid/cannabinoid mixtures in rhesus monkeys responding under a food/drug choice procedure.

Authors:  David R Maguire; Charles P France
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  High Opportunity Cost Demand as an Indicator of Weekday Drinking and Distinctly Severe Alcohol Problems: A Behavioral Economic Analysis.

Authors:  Keanan J Joyner; Lidia Z Meshesha; Ashley A Dennhardt; Brian Borsari; Matthew P Martens; James G Murphy
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Integration of motivational interviewing and behavioral economic theories to enhance brief alcohol interventions: Rationale and preliminary examination of client language.

Authors:  Benjamin O Ladd; James G Murphy; Brian Borsari
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Temporal trends in smoking and nicotine dependence in relation to co-occurring substance use in the United States, 2005-2016.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Ying Liu; Mary Waldron; Alexandra N Houston-Ludlam; Vivia V McCutcheon; Michael T Lynskey; Pamela A F Madden; Kathleen K Bucholz; Andrew C Heath; Min Lian
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.852

9.  Threat appeals reduce impulsive decision making associated with texting while driving: A behavioral economic approach.

Authors:  Yusuke Hayashi; Anne M Foreman; Jonathan E Friedel; Oliver Wirth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Trajectories of reward availability moderate the impact of brief alcohol interventions on alcohol severity in heavy-drinking young adults.

Authors:  James G Murphy; Kevin W Campbell; Keanan J Joyner; Ashley A Dennhardt; Matthew P Martens; Brian Borsari
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.