Literature DB >> 28476459

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: National trends in the treatment and peri-operative outcomes over 10years.

Peter G Passias1, Bryan J Marascalchi2, Anthony J Boniello2, Sun Yang2, Kristina Bianco2, Cyrus M Jalai2, Nancy J Worley2, Samantha R Horn2, Virginie Lafage3, John A Bendo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies show increases in cervical spine surgery prevalence and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) diagnoses in the US. However, few studies have examined outcomes for CSM surgical management, particularly on a nationwide scale.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate national trends from 2001 to 2010 for CSM patient surgical approach, postoperative outcomes, and hospital characteristics.
METHODS: A retrospective nationwide database analysis provided by the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) including CSM patients aged 25+ who underwent anterior and/or posterior cervical fusion or laminoplasty from 2001 to 2010. Patients with fractures, 9+ levels fused, or any cancer were excluded. Measures included demographics, hospital data, and procedure-related complications. Yearly trends were analyzed using linear regression modeling.
RESULTS: 54,348 discharge cases were identified. ACDF, posterior only, and combined anterior/posterior approach volumes significantly increased from 2001 to 2010 (98.62%, 303.07%, and 576.19%; respectively, p<0.05). However, laminoplasty volume remained unchanged (p>0.05). Total charges for ACDF, posterior only, combined anterior/posterior, and laminoplasty approaches all significantly increased (138.72%, 176.74%, 182.48%, and 144.85%, respectively; p<0.05). For all procedures, overall mortality significantly decreased by 45.34% (p=0.001) and overall morbidity increased by 33.82% (p=0.0002). For all procedures except ACDF, which saw a significantly decrease by 8.75% (p<0.0001), length of hospital stay was unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: For CSM patients between 2001 and 2010, combined surgical approach increased sixfold, posterior only approach increased threefold, and ACDF doubled; laminoplasties without fusion volume remained the same. Mortality decreased whereas morbidity and total charges increased. Length of stay decreased only for ACDF approach. This study provides clinically useful data to direct future research, improving patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Nationwide Inpatient Sample; Outcomes; Surgical approach; Trends

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28476459     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  9 in total

1.  Surgical Apgar Score and Controlling Nutritional Status Score are significant predictors of major complications after cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Kousei Miura; Masao Koda; Toru Funayama; Hiroshi Takahashi; Hiroshi Noguchi; Kentaro Mataki; Yosuke Shibao; Kosuke Sato; Fumihiko Eto; Mamoru Kono; Tomoyuki Asada; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database.

Authors:  Armin Arshi; Christopher Wang; Howard Y Park; Gideon W Blumstein; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A two decade experience.

Authors:  Robert F Heary; Anna MacDowall; Nitin Agarwal
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Nathan J Lee; Jun S Kim; Paul Park; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-12-30

5.  Value of Surgery and Nonsurgical Approaches for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Authors:  Jutty Parthiban; Oscar L Alves; Komal Prasad Chandrachari; Premanand Ramani; Mehmet Zileli
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-09-30

6.  Factors Associated With Return to Work After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Cohort Analysis From the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network.

Authors:  Alexander Romagna; Jefferson R Wilson; W Bradley Jacobs; Michael G Johnson; Christopher S Bailey; Sean Christie; Jerome Paquet; Andrew Nataraj; David W Cadotte; Neil Manson; Hamilton Hall; Kenneth C Thomas; Christoph Schwartz; Y Raja Rampersaud; Greg McIntosh; Charles G Fisher; Nicolas Dea
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-10-16

7.  The Difference of Sagittal Correction of Adult Subaxial Cervical Spine Surgery According to Age: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jionglin Wu; Rui Guo; Canchun Yang; Haolin Yan; Zheyu Wang; Zhipeng Chen; Xiaoshuai Peng; Di Zhang; Xu Jiang; Qiancheng Zhao; Bo Li; Xumin Hu; Liangbin Gao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Perturbation-Based Balance Training in Postoperative Individuals With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Yi-Shan Cheng; Andy Chien; Dar-Ming Lai; Ya-Yun Lee; Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Shwu-Fen Wang; Ya-Ju Chang; Jaw-Lin Wang; Wei-Li Hsu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02-20

9.  Cost-Effectiveness of Peptide Enhanced Bone Graft i-Factor versus Use of Local Autologous Bone in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Bart Thaci; Randy Yee; Kee Kim; Amir Vokshoor; J Patrick Johnson; Jared Ament
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-07-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.