Literature DB >> 28476049

Corneal K-Values as a Diagnostic Screening Tool for Marfan Syndrome.

Jan Luebke1, Daniel Boehringer, Philipp Eberwein, Thomas Reinhard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Marfan syndrome (MFS) is diagnosed based on Ghent nosology, including major and minor criteria such as increased axial length (AXL) and flattened corneal curvature (higher K-values) or myopia of more than -3 diopters (D) in its latest revision. Because corneal flattening may, in part, be caused by AXL increase, it may be helpful to consider K-values separately. We present statistical evaluation of using corneal K-values for identifying MFS.
METHODS: A retrospective study of K-values of 74 right eyes of 74 patients with MFS, who were compared with an age- and AXL-matched group of 74 right eyes of 74 patients without MFS. After multivariate analysis, receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated.
RESULTS: Mean age was 44.1 years versus 44.9 years (P = 0.834). Mean AXL was 25.22 mm versus 25.47 mm (P = 0.661). K-values showed significant differences: mean Kmax was 8.25 mm (40.91 D) versus 7.9 mm (42.72 D) (P < 0.001) and mean Kmin was 8.22 mm (41.06 D) versus 7.69 mm (43.89 D) (P < 0.001). The area under the curve in receiver operating characteristic analysis was 0.82 for Kmax and 0.78 for Kmin; the best cutoff was seen at a Kmax of at least 8.16 mm (41.36 D; sensitivity 73% and specificity 81%).
CONCLUSIONS: Although both K-values differ significantly, Kmax is the better marker to identify MFS. A Kmax of more than 8.16 mm (41.36 D) seems to be a reasonable cutoff (specificity of 81% and sensitivity of 73%). Because this biometric value is easily obtained and standardized, we see it as a good supporting screening tool for MFS suspects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28476049     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  6 in total

Review 1.  Systemic diseases and the cornea.

Authors:  Ruchi Shah; Cynthia Amador; Kati Tormanen; Sean Ghiam; Mehrnoosh Saghizadeh; Vaithi Arumugaswami; Ashok Kumar; Andrei A Kramerov; Alexander V Ljubimov
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Corneal Curvature, Astigmatism, and Aberrations in Marfan Syndrome with Lens Subluxation: Evaluation by Pentacam HR System.

Authors:  Jiahui Chen; Qinghe Jing; Yating Tang; Dongjin Qian; Yi Lu; Yongxiang Jiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Age Differences in Axial Length, Corneal Curvature, and Corneal Astigmatism in Marfan Syndrome with Ectopia Lentis.

Authors:  Jiahui Chen; Qinghe Jing; Yating Tang; Dongjin Qian; Yi Lu; Yongxiang Jiang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Differential diagnosis of Marfan syndrome based on ocular biologic parameters.

Authors:  Yiyao Wang; Zhangkai Lian; Yijing Zhou; Xuepei Li; Jieyi Wu; Xinyu Zhang; Guangming Jin; Danying Zheng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

5.  Clinical profile and outcome of ocular manifestation in Marfans syndrome in India.

Authors:  Shreya Shah; Mehul Shah; Pradeep Chandane; Sakshi Makhloga; Deeksha Thorat; Meera Sanghani
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.969

6.  Retinal and Choroidal Vasculature in Patients with Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Matteo Di Marino; Massimo Cesareo; Gianluca Aloe; Carlo Nucci; Clarissa Giannini; Alessio Martucci; Francesco Aiello; Calogera Pisano; Giovanni Ruvolo; Raffaele Mancino
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.