Literature DB >> 28475981

Soft tissue artifact causes significant errors in the calculation of joint angles and range of motion at the hip.

Niccolo M Fiorentino1, Penny R Atkins2, Michael J Kutschke1, Justine M Goebel1, K Bo Foreman3, Andrew E Anderson4.   

Abstract

Soft tissue movement between reflective skin markers and underlying bone induces errors in gait analysis. These errors are known as soft tissue artifact (STA). Prior studies have not examined how STA affects hip joint angles and range of motion (ROM) during dynamic activities. Herein, we: 1) measured STA of skin markers on the pelvis and thigh during walking, hip abduction and hip rotation, 2) quantified errors in tracking the thigh, pelvis and hip joint angles/ROM, and 3) determined whether model constraints on hip joint degrees of freedom mitigated errors. Eleven asymptomatic young adults were imaged simultaneously with retroreflective skin markers (SM) and dual fluoroscopy (DF), an X-ray technique with sub-millimeter and sub-degree accuracy. STA, defined as the range of SM positions in the DF-measured bone anatomical frame, varied based on marker location, activity and subject. Considering all skin markers and activities, mean STA ranged from 0.3cm to 5.4cm. STA caused the hip joint angle tracked with SM to be 1.9° more extended, 0.6° more adducted, and 5.8° more internally rotated than the hip tracked with DF. ROM was reduced for SM measurements relative to DF, with the largest difference of 21.8° about the internal-external axis during hip rotation. Constraining the model did not consistently reduce angle errors. Our results indicate STA causes substantial errors, particularly for markers tracking the femur and during hip internal-external rotation. This study establishes the need for future research to develop methods minimizing STA of markers on the thigh and pelvis.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual fluoroscopy; Gait models; Hip; Measurement errors; Skin markers; Skin motion artifact

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28475981     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  14 in total

1.  Soft tissue artifact causes underestimation of hip joint kinematics and kinetics in a rigid-body musculoskeletal model.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Penny R Atkins; Michael J Kutschke; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  In Vivo Pelvic and Hip Joint Kinematics in Patients With Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Dual Fluoroscopy Study.

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Joseph A Hartle; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  The effect of using different coordinate systems on in-vivo hip angles can be estimated from computed tomography images.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Penny R Atkins; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A new 2D-3D registration gold-standard dataset for the hip joint based on uncertainty modeling.

Authors:  Fabio D'Isidoro; Christophe Chênes; Stephen J Ferguson; Jérôme Schmid
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  The impact of thigh and shank marker quantity on lower extremity kinematics using a constrained model.

Authors:  Annelise A Slater; Todd J Hullfish; Josh R Baxter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Validity of inertial sensor based 3D joint kinematics of static and dynamic sport and physiotherapy specific movements.

Authors:  Wolfgang Teufl; Markus Miezal; Bertram Taetz; Michael Fröhlich; Gabriele Bleser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Penny R Atkins; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.424

8.  Joint Center Estimation Using Single-Frame Optimization: Part 1: Numerical Simulation.

Authors:  Eric Frick; Salam Rahmatalla
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Joint Center Estimation Using Single-Frame Optimization: Part 2: Experimentation.

Authors:  Eric Frick; Salam Rahmatalla
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Validity, Test-Retest Reliability and Long-Term Stability of Magnetometer Free Inertial Sensor Based 3D Joint Kinematics.

Authors:  Wolfgang Teufl; Markus Miezal; Bertram Taetz; Michael Fröhlich; Gabriele Bleser
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.