Literature DB >> 28473876

Joint Estimation of Precision Matrices in Heterogeneous Populations.

Takumi Saegusa1, Ali Shojaie2.   

Abstract

We introduce a general framework for estimation of inverse covariance, or precision, matrices from heterogeneous populations. The proposed framework uses a Laplacian shrinkage penalty to encourage similarity among estimates from disparate, but related, subpopulations, while allowing for differences among matrices. We propose an efficient alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) algorithm for parameter estimation, as well as its extension for faster computation in high dimensions by thresholding the empirical covariance matrix to identify the joint block diagonal structure in the estimated precision matrices. We establish both variable selection and norm consistency of the proposed estimator for distributions with exponential or polynomial tails. Further, to extend the applicability of the method to the settings with unknown populations structure, we propose a Laplacian penalty based on hierarchical clustering, and discuss conditions under which this data-driven choice results in consistent estimation of precision matrices in heterogenous populations. Extensive numerical studies and applications to gene expression data from subtypes of cancer with distinct clinical outcomes indicate the potential advantages of the proposed method over existing approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Graph Laplacian; graphical modeling; heterogeneous populations; hierarchical clustering; high-dimensional estimation; precision matrix; sparsity

Year:  2016        PMID: 28473876      PMCID: PMC5412991          DOI: 10.1214/16-EJS1137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electron J Stat        ISSN: 1935-7524            Impact factor:   1.125


  10 in total

1.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Joint estimation of multiple graphical models.

Authors:  Jian Guo; Elizaveta Levina; George Michailidis; Ji Zhu
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  The Sparse Laplacian Shrinkage Estimator for High-Dimensional Regression.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Shuangge Ma; Hongzhe Li; Cun-Hui Zhang
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.028

4.  Bayesian Inference of Multiple Gaussian Graphical Models.

Authors:  Christine B Peterson; Francesco C Stingo; Marina Vannucci
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The joint graphical lasso for inverse covariance estimation across multiple classes.

Authors:  Patrick Danaher; Pei Wang; Daniela M Witten
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  VARIABLE SELECTION AND REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR GRAPH-STRUCTURED COVARIATES WITH AN APPLICATION TO GENOMICS.

Authors:  Caiyan Li; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  Genomic subtypes of breast cancer identified by array-comparative genomic hybridization display distinct molecular and clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Göran Jönsson; Johan Staaf; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Markus Ringnér; Karolina Holm; Cecilia Hegardt; Haukur Gunnarsson; Rainer Fagerholm; Carina Strand; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Outi Kilpivaara; Lena Luts; Päivi Heikkilä; Kristiina Aittomäki; Carl Blomqvist; Niklas Loman; Per Malmström; Håkan Olsson; Oskar Th Johannsson; Adalgeir Arason; Heli Nevanlinna; Rosa B Barkardottir; Ake Borg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Classification of microarray data using gene networks.

Authors:  Franck Rapaport; Andrei Zinovyev; Marie Dutreix; Emmanuel Barillot; Jean-Philippe Vert
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Comparative study of computational methods for reconstructing genetic networks of cancer-related pathways.

Authors:  Nafiseh Sedaghat; Takumi Saegusa; Timothy Randolph; Ali Shojaie
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2014-09-21
  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Nearly assumptionless screening for the mutually-exciting multivariate Hawkes process.

Authors:  Shizhe Chen; Daniela Witten; Ali Shojaie
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 1.125

2.  Bayesian Edge Regression in Undirected Graphical Models to Characterize Interpatient Heterogeneity in Cancer.

Authors:  Zeya Wang; Ahmed O Kaseb; Hesham M Amin; Manal M Hassan; Wenyi Wang; Jeffrey S Morris
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.369

Review 3.  Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications.

Authors:  Yang Ni; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Marina Vannucci; Francesco C Stingo
Journal:  Stat Methods Appt       Date:  2021-05-27

4.  Bayesian inference of networks across multiple sample groups and data types.

Authors:  Elin Shaddox; Christine B Peterson; Francesco C Stingo; Nicola A Hanania; Charmion Cruickshank-Quinn; Katerina Kechris; Russell Bowler; Marina Vannucci
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Bayesian modeling of multiple structural connectivity networks during the progression of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Christine B Peterson; Nathan Osborne; Francesco C Stingo; Pierrick Bourgeat; James D Doecke; Marina Vannucci
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Bayesian Joint Spike-and-Slab Graphical Lasso.

Authors:  Zehang Richard Li; Tyler H McCormick; Samuel J Clark
Journal:  Proc Mach Learn Res       Date:  2019-06

7.  Combining heterogeneous subgroups with graph-structured variable selection priors for Cox regression.

Authors:  Katrin Madjar; Manuela Zucknick; Katja Ickstadt; Jörg Rahnenführer
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Condition-adaptive fused graphical lasso (CFGL): An adaptive procedure for inferring condition-specific gene co-expression network.

Authors:  Yafei Lyu; Lingzhou Xue; Feipeng Zhang; Hillary Koch; Laura Saba; Katerina Kechris; Qunhua Li
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.