Literature DB >> 28472455

The long-term prognosis for live birth in couples initiating fertility treatments.

S S Malchau1, A A Henningsen2, A Loft2, S Rasmussen1, J Forman3, A Nyboe Andersen2, A Pinborg1.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What are the long-term chances of having a child for couples starting fertility treatments and how many conceive with ART, IUI and without treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER: Total 5-year live birthrates were strongly influenced by female age and ranged from 80% in women under 35-26% in women ≥40 years, overall, 14% of couples conceived naturally and one-third of couples starting treatments with intrauterine insemination delivered from that treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Few studies report success rates in fertility treatments across a couple's complete fertility treatment history, across clinics, evaluating live births after insemination, ART and natural conceptions. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This register-based national cohort study from Denmark includes all women initiating fertility treatments in public and private clinics with homologous gametes in 2007-2010. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Women were identified in the Danish ART Registry and were cross-linked with the Medical Birth Registry to identify live births. Subfertile couples were followed 2 years (N = 19 884), 3 years (N = 14 445) and 5 years (N = 5165), or until their first live birth. Cumulative live birthrates were estimated 2, 3 and 5 years from the first treatment cycle, in all women, including drop-outs. Birthrates were stratified by type of first treatment (ART/IUI), mode of conception (ART/IUI/natural conception) and female age. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Within 5 years, in women aged <35 years (N = 3553), 35-39 years (N = 1156) and ≥40 years (N = 451), a total of 64%, 49% and 16% had a live birth due to treatment, respectively. Additionally, in women aged < 35 years, 35-39 years and ≥40 years, 16%, 11% and 10% delivered after natural conception, yielding total 5-year birthrates of 80%, 60% and 26%. In women starting treatments with IUI (N = 3028), 35% delivered after IUI within 5 years, 24% delivered after shift to ART treatments and 17% delivered after natural conception. Within 5 years from starting treatments with ART (N = 2137), 53% delivered after ART, 11% delivered after natural conception and 0.6% delivered after IUI. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Birthrates are most likely higher compared to countries without national coverage of treatments and results are influenced by laws and regulations. Information on duration of infertility prior to treatment was not available. Future prospective intervention studies should focus on the role of expectant management. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Our results can provide couples with a comprehensible age-stratified prognosis at start of treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was unconditionally funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals and the Augustinus foundation. All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: S.S.M. received an unconditional grant from Ferring Pharmaceuticals; A.A.H. has received personal fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals not related to this work; A.N.A. reports grants and personal fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Merck Serono, grants and personal fees from MSD, outside the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (J.nr. 2012-41-1330).
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted reproductive technology; cumulative live birthrates; fertility treatments; intrauterine insemination; long-term prognosis; natural conception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28472455     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  18 in total

1.  Concerns about treatment for infertility in a probability-based sample of US women.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Kathleen S Slauson-Blevins; Michele H Lowry; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  J Reprod Infant Psychol       Date:  2019-03-20

2.  The Danish National Register of assisted reproductive technology: content and research potentials.

Authors:  Line Riis Jølving; Karin Erb; Bente Mertz Nørgård; Jens Fedder; Michael Due Larsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Carleigh B Nesbit; Misty Blanchette-Porter; Navid Esfandiari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Accounting for past patient composition in evaluations of quality reporting.

Authors:  Katherine I Tierney; Samuel Fishman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 5.  Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update.

Authors:  Thor Haahr; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Attitudes towards family formation among men attending fertility counselling.

Authors:  R Sylvest; E Koert; K Birch Petersen; G M H Malling; F Hald; A Nyboe Andersen; L Schmidt
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2018-07-20

Review 7.  Defining Low Prognosis Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: POSEIDON Criteria-The Why.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Matheus Roque; Giuliano M Bedoschi; Alessandro Conforti; Peter Humaidan; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Restorative reproductive medicine for infertility in two family medicine clinics in New England, an observational study.

Authors:  Joseph B Stanford; Paul A Carpentier; Barbara L Meier; Mark Rollo; Benjamin Tingey
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Prognostic factors in IUI.

Authors:  Gulam Bahadur; Roy Homburg
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2019-01-31

Review 10.  Growing body of evidence supports intrauterine insemination as first line treatment and rejects unfounded concerns about its efficacy, risks and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  Gulam Bahadur; Roy Homburg
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2019-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.