Literature DB >> 28472369

Using Publicly Available Data to Quantify Plant-Pollinator Interactions and Evaluate Conservation Seeding Mixes in the Northern Great Plains.

C R V Otto1, S O'Dell1, R B Bryant2,3, N H Euliss1, R M Bush4, M D Smart1.   

Abstract

Concern over declining pollinators has led to multiple conservation initiatives for improving forage for bees in agroecosystems. Using data available through the Pollinator Library (npwrc.usgs.gov/pollinator/), we summarize plant-pollinator interaction data collected from 2012-2015 on lands managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and private lands enrolled in U.S. Department of Agriculture conservation programs in eastern North Dakota (ND). Furthermore, we demonstrate how plant-pollinator interaction data from the Pollinator Library and seed cost information can be used to evaluate hypothetical seeding mixes for pollinator habitat enhancements. We summarize records of 314 wild bee and 849 honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) interactions detected on 63 different plant species. The wild bee observations consisted of 46 species, 15 genera, and 5 families. Over 54% of all wild bee observations were represented by three genera-Bombus, Lassioglossum, and Melissodes. The most commonly visited forbs by wild bees were Monarda fistulosa, Sonchus arvensis, and Zizia aurea. The most commonly visited forbs by A. mellifera were Cirsium arvense, Melilotus officinalis, and Medicago sativa. Among all interactions, 13% of A. mellifera and 77% of wild bee observations were made on plants native to ND. Our seed mix evaluation shows that mixes may often need to be tailored to meet the unique needs of wild bees and managed honey bees in agricultural landscapes. Our evaluation also demonstrates the importance of incorporating both biologic and economic information when attempting to design cost-effective seeding mixes for supporting pollinators in a critically important part of the United States. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2017. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  forage; honey bee; native bee; plant visit; seed mix

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28472369     DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvx070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Entomol        ISSN: 0046-225X            Impact factor:   2.377


  6 in total

1.  Diverging landscape impacts on macronutrient status despite overlapping diets in managed (Apis mellifera) and native (Melissodes desponsa) bees.

Authors:  Christina L Mogren; María-Soledad Benítez; Kevin McCarter; Frédéric Boyer; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Native habitat mitigates feast-famine conditions faced by honey bees in an agricultural landscape.

Authors:  Adam G Dolezal; Ashley L St Clair; Ge Zhang; Amy L Toth; Matthew E O'Neal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coflowering invasive plants and a congener have neutral effects on fitness components of a rare endemic plant.

Authors:  Diane L Larson; Jennifer L Larson; Amy J Symstad; Deborah A Buhl; Zachary M Portman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Past role and future outlook of the Conservation Reserve Program for supporting honey bees in the Great Plains.

Authors:  Clint R V Otto; Haochi Zheng; Alisa L Gallant; Rich Iovanna; Benjamin L Carlson; Matthew D Smart; Skip Hyberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Molecular sequencing and morphological identification reveal similar patterns in native bee communities across public and private grasslands of eastern North Dakota.

Authors:  Brian Darby; Russ Bryant; Abby Keller; Madison Jochim; Josephine Moe; Zoe Schreiner; Carrie Pratt; Ned H Euliss; Mia Park; Rebecca Simmons; Clint Otto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  IPM reduces insecticide applications by 95% while maintaining or enhancing crop yields through wild pollinator conservation.

Authors:  Jacob R Pecenka; Laura L Ingwell; Rick E Foster; Christian H Krupke; Ian Kaplan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.