Literature DB >> 28471911

Application of Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Individualized Infliximab Dosing Strategies in Crohn Disease.

Adam Frymoyer1, Daniël R Hoekman2, Travis L Piester3, Tim G de Meij4, Thalia Z Hummel5, Marc A Benninga2, Angelika Kindermann2, K T Park3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The pharmacokinetics of infliximab (IFX) is highly variable in children with Crohn disease (CD), and a one-size-fits-all approach to dosing is inadequate. Model-based drug dosing can help individualize dosing strategies. We evaluated the predictive performance and clinical utility of a published population pharmacokinetic model of IFX in children with CD.
METHODS: Within a cohort of 34 children with CD who had IFX trough concentrations measured, the pharmacokinetics of each patient was estimated in NONMEM using a published population pharmacokinetic model. Infliximab concentrations were then predicted based on each patient's dosing history and compared with actual measured concentrations (n = 59). In addition, doses 5 to 10 mg/kg and dosing intervals every 4 to 8 weeks were simulated in each patient to examine dose-trough relationships.
RESULTS: Predicted concentrations were within ±1.0 μg/mL of actual measured concentrations for 88% of measurements. The median prediction error (ie, measure of bias) was -0.15 μg/mL (95% confidence interval -0.37 to -0.05 μg/mL) and absolute prediction error (ie, measure of precision) was 0.26 μg/mL (95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.40 μg/mL). At standard maintenance dosing of 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks, a trough >3 μg/mL was predicted to be achieved in 32% of patients. To achieve a trough >3 μg/mL, a dosing interval ≤every 6 weeks was predicted to be required in 29% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A published IFX population pharmacokinetic model demonstrated accurate predictive performance in a pediatric CD population. Individualized IFX dosing strategies in children with CD will be critical to consistently achieve trough concentrations associated with optimal outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28471911      PMCID: PMC5670026          DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  30 in total

1.  A prospective cohort study to determine the relationship between serum infliximab concentration and efficacy in patients with luminal Crohn's disease.

Authors:  B G Levesque; G R Greenberg; G Zou; W J Sandborn; S Singh; S Hauenstein; L Ohrmund; C J Wong; L W Stitt; L M Shackelton; D King; S Lockton; J Ducharme; B G Feagan
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease patients in a teaching hospital setting: results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Andrea Warman; Jan Willem A Straathof; Luc J J Derijks
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.566

3.  Conventional compared with individualized chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  W E Evans; M V Relling; J H Rodman; W R Crom; J M Boyett; C H Pui
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Bayesian individualization of pharmacokinetics: simple implementation and comparison with non-Bayesian methods.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Maintenance infliximab for Crohn's disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial.

Authors:  Stephen B Hanauer; Brian G Feagan; Gary R Lichtenstein; Lloyd F Mayer; S Schreiber; Jean Frederic Colombel; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Douglas C Wolf; Allan Olson; Weihang Bao; Paul Rutgeerts
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Individualized Therapy Is a Long-Term Cost-Effective Method Compared to Dose Intensification in Crohn's Disease Patients Failing Infliximab.

Authors:  Casper Steenholdt; Jørn Brynskov; Ole Ø Thomsen; Lars K Munck; Jan Fallingborg; Lisbet A Christensen; Gitte Pedersen; Jens Kjeldsen; Bent A Jacobsen; Anne Sophie Oxholm; Jakob Kjellberg; Klaus Bendtzen; Mark A Ainsworth
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Intravenous phenytoin: a retrospective analysis of Bayesian forecasting versus conventional dosing in patients.

Authors:  Andrea Tobler; Stefan Mühlebach
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-06-29

8.  Optimizing Anti-TNF-α Therapy: Serum Levels of Infliximab and Adalimumab Are Associated With Mucosal Healing in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Authors:  Bella Ungar; Idan Levy; Yarden Yavne; Miri Yavzori; Orit Picard; Ella Fudim; Ronen Loebstein; Yehuda Chowers; Rami Eliakim; Uri Kopylov; Shomron Ben-Horin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 9.  Fundamentals of population pharmacokinetic modelling: validation methods.

Authors:  Catherine M T Sherwin; Tony K L Kiang; Michael G Spigarelli; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Identification of Pathway-Specific Serum Biomarkers of Response to Glucocorticoid and Infliximab Treatment in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Christopher R Heier; Alyson A Fiorillo; Ellen Chaisson; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Yetrib Hathout; Jesse M Damsker; Eric P Hoffman; Laurie S Conklin
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.488

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Nicholas Carman; David R Mack; Eric I Benchimol
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-04-05

2.  Improved Population Pharmacokinetic Model for Predicting Optimized Infliximab Exposure in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Laura E Bauman; Ye Xiong; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Philip Minar; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Min Dong; Michael J Rosen; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 3.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Infliximab in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Amy Hemperly; Niels Vande Casteele
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Scaling Approaches for Pediatric Dose Selection: The Fremanezumab (AJOVY®) Journey to Select a Phase 3 Dose Using Pharmacokinetic Data from a Phase 1 Study.

Authors:  Aksana Jones; Orit Cohen-Barak; Andrijana Radivojevic; Jill Fiedler-Kelly
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.321

5.  A population physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to characterize antibody disposition in pediatrics and evaluation of the model using infliximab.

Authors:  Hsuan Ping Chang; Valentina Shakhnovich; Adam Frymoyer; Ryan Sol Funk; Mara L Becker; K T Park; Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.716

6.  Effectiveness of long-term infliximab use and impact of treatment adherence on disease control in refractory, non-infectious pediatric uveitis.

Authors:  Virginia Miraldi Utz; Sabrina Bulas; Sarah Lopper; Matthew Fenchel; Ting Sa; Mitul Mehta; Daniel Ash; Daniel J Lovell; Adam H Kaufman
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.054

7.  Infliximab in young paediatric IBD patients: it is all about the dosing.

Authors:  Maria M E Jongsma; Dwight A Winter; Hien Q Huynh; Lorenzo Norsa; Seamus Hussey; Kaija-Leena Kolho; Jiri Bronsky; Amit Assa; Shlomi Cohen; Raffi Lev-Tzion; Stephanie Van Biervliet; Dimitris Rizopoulos; Tim G J de Meij; Dror S Shouval; Eytan Wine; Victorien M Wolters; Christine Martinez-Vinson; Lissy de Ridder
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.