Adam Frymoyer1, Daniël R Hoekman2, Travis L Piester3, Tim G de Meij4, Thalia Z Hummel5, Marc A Benninga2, Angelika Kindermann2, K T Park3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. 2. Academic Medical Center/Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Stanford Children's IBD Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. 4. VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam. 5. Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The pharmacokinetics of infliximab (IFX) is highly variable in children with Crohn disease (CD), and a one-size-fits-all approach to dosing is inadequate. Model-based drug dosing can help individualize dosing strategies. We evaluated the predictive performance and clinical utility of a published population pharmacokinetic model of IFX in children with CD. METHODS: Within a cohort of 34 children with CD who had IFX trough concentrations measured, the pharmacokinetics of each patient was estimated in NONMEM using a published population pharmacokinetic model. Infliximab concentrations were then predicted based on each patient's dosing history and compared with actual measured concentrations (n = 59). In addition, doses 5 to 10 mg/kg and dosing intervals every 4 to 8 weeks were simulated in each patient to examine dose-trough relationships. RESULTS: Predicted concentrations were within ±1.0 μg/mL of actual measured concentrations for 88% of measurements. The median prediction error (ie, measure of bias) was -0.15 μg/mL (95% confidence interval -0.37 to -0.05 μg/mL) and absolute prediction error (ie, measure of precision) was 0.26 μg/mL (95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.40 μg/mL). At standard maintenance dosing of 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks, a trough >3 μg/mL was predicted to be achieved in 32% of patients. To achieve a trough >3 μg/mL, a dosing interval ≤every 6 weeks was predicted to be required in 29% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: A published IFX population pharmacokinetic model demonstrated accurate predictive performance in a pediatric CD population. Individualized IFX dosing strategies in children with CD will be critical to consistently achieve trough concentrations associated with optimal outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: The pharmacokinetics of infliximab (IFX) is highly variable in children with Crohn disease (CD), and a one-size-fits-all approach to dosing is inadequate. Model-based drug dosing can help individualize dosing strategies. We evaluated the predictive performance and clinical utility of a published population pharmacokinetic model of IFX in children with CD. METHODS: Within a cohort of 34 children with CD who had IFX trough concentrations measured, the pharmacokinetics of each patient was estimated in NONMEM using a published population pharmacokinetic model. Infliximab concentrations were then predicted based on each patient's dosing history and compared with actual measured concentrations (n = 59). In addition, doses 5 to 10 mg/kg and dosing intervals every 4 to 8 weeks were simulated in each patient to examine dose-trough relationships. RESULTS: Predicted concentrations were within ±1.0 μg/mL of actual measured concentrations for 88% of measurements. The median prediction error (ie, measure of bias) was -0.15 μg/mL (95% confidence interval -0.37 to -0.05 μg/mL) and absolute prediction error (ie, measure of precision) was 0.26 μg/mL (95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.40 μg/mL). At standard maintenance dosing of 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks, a trough >3 μg/mL was predicted to be achieved in 32% of patients. To achieve a trough >3 μg/mL, a dosing interval ≤every 6 weeks was predicted to be required in 29% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: A published IFX population pharmacokinetic model demonstrated accurate predictive performance in a pediatric CD population. Individualized IFX dosing strategies in children with CD will be critical to consistently achieve trough concentrations associated with optimal outcomes.
Authors: B G Levesque; G R Greenberg; G Zou; W J Sandborn; S Singh; S Hauenstein; L Ohrmund; C J Wong; L W Stitt; L M Shackelton; D King; S Lockton; J Ducharme; B G Feagan Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Stephen B Hanauer; Brian G Feagan; Gary R Lichtenstein; Lloyd F Mayer; S Schreiber; Jean Frederic Colombel; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Douglas C Wolf; Allan Olson; Weihang Bao; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-05-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Casper Steenholdt; Jørn Brynskov; Ole Ø Thomsen; Lars K Munck; Jan Fallingborg; Lisbet A Christensen; Gitte Pedersen; Jens Kjeldsen; Bent A Jacobsen; Anne Sophie Oxholm; Jakob Kjellberg; Klaus Bendtzen; Mark A Ainsworth Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Christopher R Heier; Alyson A Fiorillo; Ellen Chaisson; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Yetrib Hathout; Jesse M Damsker; Eric P Hoffman; Laurie S Conklin Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: Laura E Bauman; Ye Xiong; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Philip Minar; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Min Dong; Michael J Rosen; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Hsuan Ping Chang; Valentina Shakhnovich; Adam Frymoyer; Ryan Sol Funk; Mara L Becker; K T Park; Dhaval K Shah Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Virginia Miraldi Utz; Sabrina Bulas; Sarah Lopper; Matthew Fenchel; Ting Sa; Mitul Mehta; Daniel Ash; Daniel J Lovell; Adam H Kaufman Journal: Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Date: 2019-11-29 Impact factor: 3.054
Authors: Maria M E Jongsma; Dwight A Winter; Hien Q Huynh; Lorenzo Norsa; Seamus Hussey; Kaija-Leena Kolho; Jiri Bronsky; Amit Assa; Shlomi Cohen; Raffi Lev-Tzion; Stephanie Van Biervliet; Dimitris Rizopoulos; Tim G J de Meij; Dror S Shouval; Eytan Wine; Victorien M Wolters; Christine Martinez-Vinson; Lissy de Ridder Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 3.183