Literature DB >> 28471221

The salience of a reward cue can outlast reward devaluation.

Matteo De Tommaso1, Tommaso Mastropasqua1, Massimo Turatto1.   

Abstract

Reward cues can be perceived as highly attractive stimuli because of their acquired motivational properties. However, because the motivational value of reward changes after reward receipt, a debated question is whether the attentional salience of reward cues changes accordingly. In Experiment 1, thirsty participants learned 3 cue-reward associations involving different contingencies. Then, while thirsty, participants performed a visual-search task under extinction, during which the previous reward cues appeared as irrelevant stimuli containing target and distractor items. Experiment 2 was identical to Experiment 1, except that participants drank ad libitum before the visual-search task. In Experiment 3, instead, participants quenched their thirst at the beginning of the learning session. The results of Experiment 1 showed that attention was preferentially deployed toward the cue that best predicted the reward in the previous conditioning phase. Crucially, Experiment 2 revealed that the attentional bias persisted despite reward devaluation. By contrast, no attentional bias was found in Experiment 3. The novelty of our study is that the attentional salience of a reward cue can outlast reward devaluation, suggesting that some incentive properties of the cue can become independent from those of the reward. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28471221     DOI: 10.1037/bne0000193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  9 in total

1.  Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim; Mark K Britton; Andy Jeesu Kim
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-06-12

2.  Multiple reward-cue contingencies favor expectancy over uncertainty in shaping the reward-cue attentional salience.

Authors:  Matteo De Tommaso; Tommaso Mastropasqua; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-25

3.  Attentional capture by signals of reward persists following outcome devaluation.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Yenti Pavri; Jenny Le; Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.699

4.  Evidence for a shared representation of sequential cues that engage sign-tracking.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Smedley; Kyle S Smith
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.729

5.  Evidence of structure and persistence in motivational attraction to serial Pavlovian cues.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Smedley; Kyle S Smith
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Sign-tracking behavior is sensitive to outcome devaluation in a devaluation context-dependent manner: implications for analyzing habitual behavior.

Authors:  Kenneth A Amaya; Jeffrey J Stott; Kyle S Smith
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Basolateral Amygdala to Nucleus Accumbens Communication Differentially Mediates Devaluation Sensitivity of Sign- and Goal-Tracking Rats.

Authors:  Daniel E Kochli; Sara E Keefer; Utsav Gyawali; Donna J Calu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Testing reward-cue attentional salience: Attainment and dynamic changes.

Authors:  Matteo De Tommaso; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2021-10-28

9.  Effects of Limited and Extended Pavlovian Training on Devaluation Sensitivity of Sign- and Goal-Tracking Rats.

Authors:  Sara E Keefer; Sam Z Bacharach; Daniel E Kochli; Jules M Chabot; Donna J Calu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.558

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.