P Vayne-Bossert1,2, E Richard1, P Good1,3,4, K Sullivan1,3, J R Hardy5,6. 1. Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Mater Health Services, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. 2. Department of Palliative Medicine and Readaptation, University Hospitals of Geneva, Collonge-Bellerive, Geneva, Switzerland. 3. Mater Research-University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia. 4. St Vincent's Private Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 5. Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Mater Health Services, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. Janet.Hardy@mater.org.au. 6. Mater Research-University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia. Janet.Hardy@mater.org.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Integration of oncology and palliative care (PC) should be the standard model of care for patients with advanced cancer. An expert panel developed criteria that constitute integration. This study determined whether the PC service within this Health Service, which is considered to be fully "integrated", could be benchmarked against these criteria. METHODS: A survey was undertaken to determine the perceived level of integration of oncology and palliative care by all health care professionals (HCPs) within our cancer centre. An objective determination of integration was obtained from chart reviews of deceased patients. Integration was defined as >70% of all respondents answered "agree" or "strongly agree" to each indicator and >70% of patient charts supported each criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-four HCPs participated in the survey (response rate 69%). Over 90% were aware of the outpatient PC clinic, interdisciplinary and consultation team, PC senior leadership, and the acceptance of concurrent anticancer therapy. None of the other criteria met the 70% agreement mark but many respondents lacked the necessary knowledge to respond. The chart review included 67 patients, 92% of whom were seen by the PC team prior to death. The median time from referral to death was 103 days (range 0-1347). The level of agreement across all criteria was below our predefined definition of integration. CONCLUSION: The integration criteria relating to service delivery are medically focused and do not lend themselves to interdisciplinary review. The objective criteria can be audited and serve both as a benchmark and a basis for improvement activities.
BACKGROUND: Integration of oncology and palliative care (PC) should be the standard model of care for patients with advanced cancer. An expert panel developed criteria that constitute integration. This study determined whether the PC service within this Health Service, which is considered to be fully "integrated", could be benchmarked against these criteria. METHODS: A survey was undertaken to determine the perceived level of integration of oncology and palliative care by all health care professionals (HCPs) within our cancer centre. An objective determination of integration was obtained from chart reviews of deceased patients. Integration was defined as >70% of all respondents answered "agree" or "strongly agree" to each indicator and >70% of patient charts supported each criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-four HCPs participated in the survey (response rate 69%). Over 90% were aware of the outpatient PC clinic, interdisciplinary and consultation team, PC senior leadership, and the acceptance of concurrent anticancer therapy. None of the other criteria met the 70% agreement mark but many respondents lacked the necessary knowledge to respond. The chart review included 67 patients, 92% of whom were seen by the PC team prior to death. The median time from referral to death was 103 days (range 0-1347). The level of agreement across all criteria was below our predefined definition of integration. CONCLUSION: The integration criteria relating to service delivery are medically focused and do not lend themselves to interdisciplinary review. The objective criteria can be audited and serve both as a benchmark and a basis for improvement activities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Benchmarking; Criteria for integration; Integration; Oncology and palliative care
Authors: D Hui; S Bansal; F Strasser; T Morita; A Caraceni; M Davis; N Cherny; S Kaasa; D Currow; A Abernethy; C Nekolaichuk; E Bruera Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Alona Muzikansky; Emily R Gallagher; Sonal Admane; Vicki A Jackson; Constance M Dahlin; Craig D Blinderman; Juliet Jacobsen; William F Pirl; J Andrew Billings; Thomas J Lynch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Camilla Zimmermann; Nadia Swami; Monika Krzyzanowska; Breffni Hannon; Natasha Leighl; Amit Oza; Malcolm Moore; Anne Rydall; Gary Rodin; Ian Tannock; Allan Donner; Christopher Lo Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Thomas J Smith; Sarah Temin; Erin R Alesi; Amy P Abernethy; Tracy A Balboni; Ethan M Basch; Betty R Ferrell; Matt Loscalzo; Diane E Meier; Judith A Paice; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Mark Somerfield; Ellen Stovall; Jamie H Von Roenn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roberta I Jordan; Matthew J Allsop; Yousuf ElMokhallalati; Catriona E Jackson; Helen L Edwards; Emma J Chapman; Luc Deliens; Michael I Bennett Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 8.775