| Literature DB >> 28468264 |
Maria Daglia1, Arianna Di Lorenzo2,3, Seyed Fazel Nabavi4, Antoni Sureda5, Sedigheh Khanjani6, Akbar Hajizadeh Moghaddam7, Nady Braidy8,9, Seyed Mohammad Nabavi10.
Abstract
Green GABA (GGABA) and Oolong GABA (OGABA) teas are relatively new varieties of tea, whose chemical composition and functional properties are largely under-studied, despite their promising health capacities. Post stroke depression (PSD) is a complication of stroke with high clinical relevance, yielding increasing mortality and morbidity rates, and a lower response to common therapies and rehabilitation.Entities:
Keywords: GABA green tea; GABA oolong tea; antioxidant activity; post-stroke depression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28468264 PMCID: PMC5452176 DOI: 10.3390/nu9050446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition of water utilized for tea infusion, expressed as mg of anion or cation dissolved in 1 L of water.
| Anions/Cations | mg/L |
|---|---|
| HCO3− | 7.5 |
| F− | <0.1 |
| NO3− | 1.1 |
| SO42− | 3.8 |
| Ca2+ | 2.4 |
| Na+ | 1.7 |
| Total dissolved solids | 23.8 |
Chromatographic behavior (retention time, RT), UV, MS and MS/MS data of the compounds identified in GGABA and OGABA extracts.
| Peak | RT (min) | λ max (nm) | HPLC-ESI-MS/MS | Proposed Structure | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 22.5 | 222, 273 | 181 + | 137 (100) | theobromine a,b |
| 24 | 38.7 | 230, 270 | 195 + | 138 (100) | caffeine a,b |
| 1 | 5.2 | 211 | 191 | 127 (100), 85 (80) | quinic acid a,b |
| 4 | 13.6 | 219, 274 | 343 | 191 (100), 169 (10), 125 (2) | galloylquinic acid a,b |
| 11 | 27.5 | 219, 270 | 169 | 125 (100) | Gallic acid a |
| 19 | 34.1 | 211, 330 | 337 | 163 (100), 191 (10), 119 (10), 173 (5) | 3- |
| 27 | 43.5 | 211, 310 | 337 | 191 (100), 173 (25), 163 (10) | 5- |
| 29 | 46.3 | 211, 309 | 337 | 173 (100), 163 (15), 191 (10) | 4- |
| 30 | 47.7 | 210, 270, 333 | 593 | 473 (100), 353 (25), 383 (15), 503 (30) | dihexosyl-apigenin a,b |
| 32 | 52.9 | 210, 275 | 563 | 503 (70), 473 (100), 443 (80), 383 (45), 353 (50) | 6- |
| 33 | 54.2 | 210, 275 | 563 | 503 (30), 473 (100), 443 (100), 383 (40), 353 (40) | 6- |
| 38 | 58.6 | 211, 258, 352 | 577 | 413 (100), 293 (30), 457 (10), 353 (2) | rhamnosyl-hexosylapigenin a |
| 39 | 59.08 | 211, 271, 336 | 593 | 413 (100), 293 (10), 473 (10) | dihexosyl-apigenin a,b |
| 42 | 60.6 | 256, 353 | 533 | 443 (100), 473 (50), 353 (20) | 6,8- |
| 6 | 19.5 | 220, 270 | 305 | 261 (40), 221 (85), 219 (75), 179 (100), 165 (35), 125 (20) | gallocatechin a,b |
| 15 | 31.3 | 240, 270 | 305 | 261 (40), 179 (100), 219 (70), 165 (35) 221 (85), 125 (25) | epigallocatechin a,b |
| 16 | 32.4 | 211, 278 | 289 | 245 (100), 205 (40), 179 (15), 203 (40), 109 (5) | catechin b |
| 25 | 39.2 | 233, 274 | 457 | 331 (70), 169 (100), 305 (35) | epigallocatechingallate a,b |
| 26 | 43.1 | 232, 278 | 289 | 245 (100), 205 (40), 109 (5), 137 (10), 125 (2) | epicatechin a,b |
| 31 | 52.8 | 230, 276 | 441 | 289 (100), 331 (20), 169 (25) | epicatechin-gallate a,b |
| 35 | 55.8 | 219, 270, 352 | 455 | 289 (100), 183 (25) | epicatechina-3- |
| 37 | 57.2 | 209, 270 | 425 | 273 (100), 169 (40), 125 (5) | epiafzelechin-gallate a,b |
| 49 | 84.8 | 223, 270, 364, 470 | 867 | 715 (65), 697 (100), 679 (15), 527 (45), 545 (25), 559 (20) | theaflavin-digallate a |
| 50 | 84.9 | 213, 269, 367, 478 | 715 | 527 (100), 545 (80), 563 (70), 501 (40), 407 (10) | theaflavin-gallate a |
| 51 | 85.8 | 215, 270, 364 | 563 | 545 (100), 527 (30), 519 (55), 501 (30), 407 (70), 379 (50) | theaflavin a |
| 52 | 86.6 | 213, 269, 367, 478 | 715 | 527 (30), 545 (60), 563 (100), 501 (20), 407 (60) | theaflavin-gallate a |
| 34 | 54.5 | 210, 273 | 787 | 316 (100), 769 (30), 359 (20), 625 (15), 725 (20) | myricetinhexosylrutinoside b |
| 36 | 55.9 | 215, 266, 350 | 479 | 316 (100), 317 (30) | myricetinhexoside a,b |
| 41 | 60.4 | 211, 256, 356 | 771 | 301 (100), 609 (10), 463 (2) | quercetinhexosylrutinoside a,b |
| 43 | 62.7 | 207, 267, 356 | 463 | 301 (100) | quercetinhexoside a,b |
| 44 | 63.1 | 211, 256, 357 | 609 | 301 (100), 271 (15) | quercetinrutinoside a,b |
| 45 | 64.5 | 210, 267, 348 | 755 | 285 (100) | kaempferolhexosylrutinoside a,b |
| 46 | 67.3 | 210, 267, 348 | 755 | 285 (100) | kaempferolhexosylrutinoside a,b |
| 47 | 70.7 | 206, 268 | 447 | 285 (40), 284 (100), 327 (20) | kaempferolhexoside a,b |
| 48 | 70.7 | 207, 266, 345 | 593 | 285 (100) | kaempferolrutinoside a |
| 53 | 96.3 | 220, 270 | 885 | 739 (100), 431 (20), 285 (10) | kaempferol-3- |
| 2 | 7.71 | 216, 267 | 609 | 471 (100), 591 (80), 565 (20), 525 (30) | theasinensin C a |
| 3 | 9.6 | 210, 260 | 331 | 169 (100), 271 (80), 211 (40), 193 (20), 125 (15) | galloylglucosea,b |
| 5 | 18.1 | 211 | 609 | 483 (30), 441 (100), 423 (70), 305 (20), 591 (29) | prodelphinidin a,b |
| 7 | 22.0 | 211, 275 | 761 | 609 (100), 423 (80), 305 (20), 591 (70) | prodelphinidingallate b |
| 9 | 22.8 | 217, 270 | 761 | 609 (40), 591 (100), 453 (10) | theasinensin B a |
| 10 | 24.4 | 211, 278 | 577 | 425 (100), 407 (40), 289 (10), 451 (25) | procyanidin a |
| 12 | 29.4 | 210, 254 | 865 | 739 (15), 695 (100), 577 (45) | (epi)afzelechingallate-(epi)catechingallate a |
| 13 | 29.5 | 226, 275 | 633 | 301 (100), 463 (15) | strictinin a,b |
| 14 | 29.9 | 211, 278 | 577 | 425 (100), 407 (40), 289 (10), 451 (25) | procyanidin a,b |
| 17 | 32.5 | 223, 271 | 913 | 743 (100), 761 (50), 591 (80), 573 (45) | theasinensin C a |
| 18 | 34.0 | 221, 275 | 483 | 271 (100), 331 (20), 169 (10) | digalloylglucose b |
| 20 | 34.2 | 211, 276 | 745 | 559 (65), 407 (100), 619 (90), 577 (65), 441 (40) | (epi)catechin-(epi)gallocatechingallate a |
| 21 | 35.1 | 211, 278 | 577 | 425 (100), 407 (40), 289 (10), 451 (25) | procyanidin a,b |
| 22 | 35.9 | 211, 277 | 729 | 559 (100), 577 (95), 407 (20), 441 (5) 603 (25), 451 (35), 711 (15), 289 (10) | procyanidingallate a,b |
| 23 | 38.4 | 211, 277 | 729 | 407 (80), 577 (80), 711 (20), 559 (100), 28451 (50), 603 (50), 441 (50), 289 (10) | procyanidingallate a,b |
| 28 | 45.8 | 220, 280 | 635 | 465 (100), 483 (70), 313 (20) | trigalloylglucose b |
+ Compounds revealed in positive ionization mode; a compounds identified in GABA oolong tea extract; b compounds identified in GABA green tea extract.
Figure 1Chromatogram, acquired as total scan Photodiode Array (PDA) Detector, of Oolong GABA (OGABA) extract at 5 mg/mL.
Concentration ranges, calibration curves, correlation coefficients of the RP-HPLC-PDA method for gallic acid (GA), caffeine, catechin, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG) and epicatechin (EC).
| Analyte | Concentration Range (μg/mL) | Calibration Curve | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GA | 7–500 | 0.9999 | |
| caffeine | 10–500 | 0.9999 | |
| catechin | 25–500 | 0.9998 | |
| EGCG | 10–500 | 0.9999 | |
| ECG | 10–500 | 0.9999 | |
| EC | 7–500 | 0.9999 |
Accuracy (recovery %), intraday precision (RSD %), interday precision (RSD %), limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) of the analytical method, suitable for the quantification of GA, caffeine, catechin, EGCG, ECG and EC in tea samples. The concentration (µg/mL) of each analyte added to tea samples is reported.
| µg/mL | GA | µg/mL | Caffeine | µg/mL | Catechin | µg/mL | EGCG | µg/mL | ECG | µg/mL | EC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| recovery (%) | 2.75 | 105.7 | 12 | 100.6 | 5 | 87.3 | 10 | 90.7 | 5 | 91.1 | 3.75 | 95.9 |
| 5.5 | 106.3 | 24.5 | 101.4 | 10 | 86.1 | 20 | 89.2 | 10 | 88.7 | 7.5 | 93.2 | |
| 11 | 103.1 | 49 | 101.0 | 20 | 87.5 | 40 | 87.8 | 20 | 86.4 | 15 | 91.3 | |
| Intraday precision (RSD %) | 2.75 | 0.5 | 12 | 0.5 | 5 | 0.7 | 10 | 0.1 | 5 | 0.3 | 3.75 | 0.5 |
| 5.5 | 0.3 | 24.5 | 0.1 | 10 | 0.2 | 20 | 0.1 | 10 | 0.3 | 7.5 | 0.3 | |
| 11 | 0.8 | 49 | 0.1 | 20 | 0.9 | 40 | 0.3 | 20 | 0.1 | 15 | 0.2 | |
| Interday precision (RSD %) | 2.75 | 1.2 | 12 | 0.3 | 5 | 1.8 | 10 | 3.4 | 5 | 3.6 | 3.75 | 0.5 |
| 5.5 | 2.3 | 24.5 | 0.3 | 10 | 0.5 | 20 | 4.6 | 10 | 1.9 | 7.5 | 0.4 | |
| 11 | 0.7 | 49 | 0.2 | 20 | 0.8 | 40 | 0.5 | 20 | 1.6 | 15 | 0.2 | |
| LOQ (µg/mL) | 2.6 | 0.4 | 11.5 | 7.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | ||||||
| LOD (µg/mL) | 0.4 | 0.1 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
Bioactive components concentration (μg/mL of tea beverage) in green GABA (GGABA) and OGABA extracts. Data are expressed as mean of three independent measurements ± standard deviation. N.D. = no detected.
| Compound | GGABA | OGABA |
|---|---|---|
| catechin | 361.93 ± 3.9 | N.D. |
| epicatechin | 329.80 ± 2.43 | 33.70 ± 0.11 |
| epicatechin-gallate | 208.64 ± 0.65 | 46.67 ± 0.14 |
| epigallocatechingallate | 906.42 ± 0.7 | 94.81 ± 0.30 |
| GABA | 17.81 ± 0.55 | 22.25 ± 0.65 |
| Glutamic acid | 27.10 ± 0.33 | 15.19 ± 0.45 |
| Glutamine | 10.08 ± 0.10 | 4.39 ± 0.08 |
| Theanine | 90.84 ± 0.87 | 46.15 ± 0.93 |
| gallic acid | N.D. | 59.47 ± 0.31 |
| caffeine | 1039.85 ± 4.32 | 525.05 ± 4.28 |
Figure 2HPLC/FLD chromatograms of GGABA extract at the concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, respectively. The analysis showed the presence of (1) aspartic acid; (2) glutamic acid; (3) serine; (4) glutamine; (5) glycine; (6) threonine; (7) alanine; (8) arginine; (9) GABA 1; (10) theanine; (11) tyrosine; (12) cysteine; (13) valine; (14) GABA 2; (15) phenylalanine; (16) isoleucine; (17) leucine; (18) proline.
Figure 3Volume of water (A) and sucrose solution (B) consumption in stroke-induced anhedonia model. Data are shown as a mean (mL) ± SD (n = 3); different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two groups.
Figure 4Effects of oral administration of OGABA and GGABA extracts on swimming time in forced swimming model. Data are mean(s) ± SD (n = 7); different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two groups.
Figure 5Effects of oral administration of OGABA and GGABA extracts on climbing time in forced swimming model. Data are mean(s) ± SD (n = 7); different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two groups.
Figure 6Effects of oral administration of OGABA and GGABA extracts on immobility time in forced swimming model. Data are mean(s) ± SD (n = 7); different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two groups.
Figure 7Effects of oral administration of OGABA and GGABA extracts on immobility time in tail suspension model. Data are mean(s) ± SD (n = 7); different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two groups.
Figure 8Effects of oral administration of OGABA and GGABA extracts on oxidative stress levels. In detail, thiobarbituric-reactive substances (TBARS) levels, expressed as nmol malondialdehyde (MDA) eq/g tissues (A); superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, expressed as U/mg protein (B); Catalase activity, expressed as U/mg protein (C); and glutathione (GSH) levels, expressed as µg/mg protein (D) in mouse brain tissue are reported. Data are mean ± SD (n = 7); different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two groups.
Pearson’s linear correlation between the data obtained from antioxidant assays and the data obtained from behavioral tests (DST and TST).
| TBARS | SOD | Cat | GSH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.674 a
| 0.448 a
| 0.593 a
| 0.279 | |
| −0.595 a
| 0.356 b
| 0.526 a
| 0.188 | |
| 0.483 a
| −0.271 | −0.366 b
| −0.020 | |
| 0.568 a
| −0.339 b
| −0.468 a
| −0.129 |
TBARS: thiobarbituric-reactive substances; SOD: superoxide dismutase activity, Cat: catalase activity; GSH: glutathione. Bivariate Correlations: a Indicates a correlation at p < 0.01.b Indicates a correlation at p < 0.05.