BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Published data on the prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in ovarian cancer are controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to obtain a more accurate assessment of prognostic significance of NLR in ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search using the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to May 2016. Hazard ratio (HR) and odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were carried out to explore the source of heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 10.0. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, consisting of 3,854 patients, which met our criterion were selected in this meta-analysis. Our pooled results showed that high pre-treatment NLR level was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.29-2.22) and shorter progression free survival (PFS) (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.27-2.09). Additionally, increased NLR was also significantly correlated with advanced FIGO stage (OR 2.32, 95% CI1.79-3.00), higher serum level of CA-125 (OR 3.33, 95% CI 2.43-4.58), more extensive ascites (OR 3.54, 95% CI 2.31-5.42) as well as less chemotheraputic response (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.70). The findings from most of subgroup meta-analyses were consistent with those from the overall meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated pre-treatment NLR could served as a predicative factor of poor prognosis for ovarian cancer patients.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Published data on the prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in ovarian cancer are controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to obtain a more accurate assessment of prognostic significance of NLR in ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search using the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to May 2016. Hazard ratio (HR) and odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were carried out to explore the source of heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 10.0. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, consisting of 3,854 patients, which met our criterion were selected in this meta-analysis. Our pooled results showed that high pre-treatment NLR level was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.29-2.22) and shorter progression free survival (PFS) (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.27-2.09). Additionally, increased NLR was also significantly correlated with advanced FIGO stage (OR 2.32, 95% CI1.79-3.00), higher serum level of CA-125 (OR 3.33, 95% CI 2.43-4.58), more extensive ascites (OR 3.54, 95% CI 2.31-5.42) as well as less chemotheraputic response (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.70). The findings from most of subgroup meta-analyses were consistent with those from the overall meta-analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated pre-treatment NLR could served as a predicative factor of poor prognosis for ovarian cancerpatients.
Authors: Kelly L Singel; Tiffany R Emmons; Anm Nazmul H Khan; Paul C Mayor; Shichen Shen; Jerry T Wong; Kayla Morrell; Kevin H Eng; Jaron Mark; Richard B Bankert; Junko Matsuzaki; Richard C Koya; Anna M Blom; Kenneth R McLeish; Jun Qu; Sanjay Ram; Kirsten B Moysich; Scott I Abrams; Kunle Odunsi; Emese Zsiros; Brahm H Segal Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-03-07
Authors: Chang Ik Yoon; Soeun Park; Yoon Jin Cha; Hye Sun Lee; Soong June Bae; Chihwan Cha; Da Young Lee; Sung Gwe Ahn; Joon Jeong Journal: Breast Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Claudia Marchetti; Marco D'Indinosante; Carolina Bottoni; Chiara Di Ilio; Stefano Di Berardino; Barbara Costantini; Angelo Minucci; Laura Vertechy; Giovanni Scambia; Anna Fagotti Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Michal Mleko; Kazimierz Pitynski; Elzbieta Pluta; Aleksandra Czerw; Katarzyna Sygit; Beata Karakiewicz; Tomasz Banas Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 3.989
Authors: Gysllene M C Brito; Andrea M M Fontenele; Erika Cristina R L Carneiro; Iara Antonia L Nogueira; Tamires B Cavalcante; André A M Vale; Sally Cristina M Monteiro; Natalino Salgado Filho Journal: Int J Inflam Date: 2021-06-23