| Literature DB >> 28467130 |
Ana Paula Reis Durão1, Aline Morosolli2, Jackie Brown3, Reinhilde Jacobs4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing scientific literature and evidence about (a) the validation of masseter muscle ultrasonography for accurate assessment of muscle thickness and (b) the reproducibility of masseter muscle thickness measures. An electronic literature search was conducted using determined keywords on specific databases. Preliminary search revealed 298 articles listed in Medline, Scopus and Web of Science. 60 duplicates were rejected, leaving 238 articles for review. After reading titles and abstracts, 31 articles remained. 23 articles were assessed for eligibility. These articles were categorized as follows: thickness, cross-section, volume and the length of the masseter muscle measured by ultrasonography. It is possible to verify the thickness of the masseter muscle in males and females in relaxation (10-15 and 9-13 mm, respectively) and contraction (14-19 and 12-15 mm, respectively). A similar tendency can also be evidenced in other measurements. Many studies evaluate masseter muscle dimensions to relate it to cephalometric analysis as such to evaluate morphological variations. It can be concluded that ultrasound is a reliable clinical tool for masseter muscle measurements, yet there is a need for standardization of methods and parameters to be recorded.Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28467130 PMCID: PMC5606285 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol ISSN: 0250-832X Impact factor: 2.419