Literature DB >> 21262936

Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.

Yasuki Uchida1, Mitsuru Motoyoshi, Toru Shigeeda, Akihiko Shinohara, Yu Igarashi, Masahito Sakaguchi, Noriyoshi Shimizu.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between masseter muscle size and craniofacial morphology, focusing on the maxilla. Twenty-four patients (11 males and 13 females; mean age 27.6 ± 5.6 years) underwent cephalometric analyses. Ultrasonography was used to measure the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the masseter muscle and bite force was measured using pressure sensitive film. The results showed that CSA-relaxed was positively correlated with upper anterior face height (UAFH)/total anterior face height (TAFH) and negatively with lower anterior face height (LAFH)/TAFH and LAFH (P < 0.05). CSA-clenched was correlated positively with SN-palatal, FH-palatal, UAFH/TAFH, and lower posterior face height (LPFH)/total posterior face height (TPFH) and negatively with LAFH/TAFH, LAFH, upper posterior face height (UPFH)/TPFH, and UPFH (P < 0.05). Bite force was positively correlated with LPFH/TPFH and negatively with UPFH/TPFH (P < 0.05). As the masseter became larger, the anterior maxillary region tended to shift downwards relative to the cranial base, whereas the posterior region tended to shift upwards. The decrease in LAFH/TAFH and increase in LPFH/TPFH as the size of the masseter muscle increases may be influenced not only by the inclination of the mandibular plane but also by the clockwise rotation of the maxilla.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21262936     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

Review 1.  Masseter muscle measurement performed by ultrasound: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Paula Reis Durão; Aline Morosolli; Jackie Brown; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  The role of craniofacial maldevelopment in the modern OSA epidemic: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jason L Yu; Akshay Tangutur; Eric Thuler; Marianna Evans; Raj C Dedhia
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Correlation between mandibular morphology and masticatory muscle thickness in normal occlusion and mandibular prognathism.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Kim; Chul-Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-10-31

4.  Square Face Correction by Gonial Angle and Masseter Reduction.

Authors:  S M Balaji; Preetha Balaji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-06-08

5.  Masseter Muscle Thickness in Unilateral Partial Edentulism: An Ultrasonographic Study.

Authors:  S Sathasivasubramanian; P M Venkatasai; C V Divyambika; Rupesh Mandava; R Jeffrey; N A Nathera Jabeen; S Shankar Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2017-12-28

6.  The relationship between masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and facial profile in young Korean adults.

Authors:  Kyeong-Mee Park; Eunhye Choi; Eun-Jung Kwak; Seoyul Kim; Wonse Park; Jin-Sun Jeong; Kee-Deog Kim
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2018-09-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.