Literature DB >> 28465666

Challenges to genome sequence dissection in sweetpotato.

Sachiko Isobe1, Kenta Shirasawa1, Hideki Hirakawa1.   

Abstract

The development of next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has enabled the determination of whole genome sequences in many non-model plant species. However, genome sequencing in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) is still difficult because of the hexaploid genome structure. Previous studies suggested that a diploid wild relative, I. trifida (H.B.K.) Don., is the most possible ancestor of sweetpotato. Therefore, the genetic and genomic features of I. trifida have been studied as a potential reference for sweetpotato. Meanwhile, several research groups have begun the challenging task of directly sequencing the sweetpotato genome. In this manuscript, we review the recent results and activities of large-scale genome and transcriptome analysis related to genome sequence dissection in sweetpotato under the sections as follows: I. trifida genome and transcript sequencing, genome sequences of I. nil (Japanese morning glory), transcript sequences in sweetpotato, chloroplast sequences, transposable elements and transfer DNA. The recent international activities of de novo whole genome sequencing in sweetpotato are also described. The large-scale publically available genome and transcript sequence resources and the international genome sequencing streams are expected to promote the genome sequence dissection in sweetpotato.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ipomoea; genome; sweetpotato; transcript

Year:  2017        PMID: 28465666      PMCID: PMC5407923          DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.16186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breed Sci        ISSN: 1344-7610            Impact factor:   2.086


Introduction

The development of next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has drastically changed plant genomic and genetic studies. High-throughput and low-cost genome sequencing technologies have enabled the determination of whole genome sequences in many non-model plant species. The number of plant species for which the whole genomes have been sequenced is increasing each year. More than 50 plant genomes were published by 2013 (Michael and Jackson 2013), and 50 other genomes were sequenced by 2015 (Michael and VanBuren 2015). Though whole genome sequencing is becoming a popular approach, only a few genome sequences have been published in polyploidy species, such as octoploid strawberry (Hirakawa ) and hexaploid bread wheat (The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium 2014), tetraploid oilseed rape (Chalhoub ), tetraploid upland cotton (Li ) and tetraploid mustard (Yang ). The limited number of whole genome sequences for polyploidy plant species can be attributed to the difficulty of distinguishing genome sequences among homoeologous chromosomes. To overcome this limitation, the genomes of ancestor diploid species are often sequenced and used as a reference for polyploidy species (Bertioli , D’Hont , Ling , Shulaev , Wang ), thereby reducing the complexity of the genome structure in polyploidy species. Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) is a hexaploid species with 90 chromosomes (2n = 6X = 90) and a large genome size of 4.8–5.3 pg/2C nucleus (Ozias-Akins and Jarret 1994). Geographically sweetpotato is considered to have originated between the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico and the mouth of the Orinoco River in Venezuela (Austin 1988, McDonald and Austin 1990). It is the only species cultivated in the genus Ipomoea series Batatas, and thirteen wild species are thought to be closely related to sweetpotato (Austin 1988). However, no definitive conclusions have been reached as to the evolutionary origin and genome structure of sweetpotato. Nishiyama (1971) hypothesized that sweetpotato was originated from hexaploid I. trifida (H.B.K.) Don., which in turn was derived from hybridization of the diploid I. leucantha Jacq. and tetraploid I. littoralis Blume. Nearly two decades later, Shiotani and Kawase (1989) generated a synthesized hexaploid I. trifida by hybridization of the diploid (K221, B1B1, 2n = 30) and tetraploid (K222, B2B2B2B2, 2n = 60) I. trifida lines, and concluded that the genome structure of sweetpotato was autohexaploid with respect to the B genome. Another hypothesis was that the genome of sweetpotato was derived from the ancient polyploidization of diploid I. triloba (A genome), diploid I. trifida (B genome) and tetraploid I. tabascana (B genome; Reddy ). Though several species have been nominated as candidate ancestor species, a number of cytology and molecular studies have suggested that I. trifida is the closest wild species to sweetpotato (Huang and Sun 2000, Jarret and Austin 1994, Komaki , Roullier , Srisuwan ). Accordingly, the genetic and genomic features of I. trifida have been studied as a potential reference for sweetpotato. Meanwhile, several research groups have begun the challenging task of directly sequencing the sweetpotato genome. In this manuscript, we review the recent results and activities of large-scale genome and transcriptome analysis related to genome sequence dissection in sweetpotato.

I. trifida genome and transcript sequencing

An AFLP linkage map of I. trifida was constructed using an F1 mapping population derived from a cross between the diploid lines 0431-1 and Mx23-4 (Nakayama ). The 0431-1 map consists of 618 loci on 17 linkage groups while the Mx23-4 map comprises 163 loci on 15 linkage groups. The two maps were considered a first step in the construction of a diploid reference linkage map of sweetpotato. Interestingly, the paternal parent, Mx23-4, showed self-compatibility despite I. trifida was considered a self-incompatible species in most respects, and a single descendant selfed line of Mx23-4 was developed at the Kyushu Okinawa Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO/KARC). Mx23Hm, an S11 line derived from Mx23-4, was subjected to genome sequencing along with 0431-1, the maternal line of the AFLP linkage map (Table 1, Hirakawa ). The high homozygosity in Mx23Hm was confirmed by polymorphic analysis with 14 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and analysis of Kmer frequency. Paired-end (PE) and mate-pair (MP) libraries were constructed from the genome DNAs of the two lines, and genome sequencing was carried out on an Illumina HiSeq platform. The total length of the assembled sequences of Mx23Hm, designated as ITR_r1.0, was 513 Mb and consisted of 77,400 scaffold sequences with an N50 length of 42,586 bp, while the sequence number and length of the 0431-1 assembled sequences (ITRk_r1.0) were 181,194 and 712 Mb, respectively. The larger number and total length of the assembled 0431-1 genome were attributed to the high heterozygosity of this line. The two assembled sequences were classified as “core candidates” (common to the two lines) or “line-specific,” and 240 Mb (Mx23Hm) and 353 Mb (0431-1) were classified into core candidate sequences. The numbers of putative genes identified from the assembled genomes were 62,407 (62.4 Mb) and 109,449 (87.2 Mb) in Mx23Hm and 0431-1, respectively. The total of 1,464,173 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and 16,682 copy number variations (CNVs) were also identified by comparing the two assembled genomes. Although the quality of the assembled genomes was not high, the results make an important contribution to the progress of genomic and genetic studies of both I. trifida and sweetpotato. All the generated data are available on the Sweetpotato GARDEN (http://sweetpotato-garden.kazusa.or.jp/) database.
Table 1

Summary of Large-scale genome and transcriptome sequence resources in sweetpotato and I. trifida

SpeciesTypeCultivar or LineDNA/RNA Extracted organAssembled SequencesSequence platformAssemblerReference

NumberTotal length (bp)Average length (bp)N50 (bp)
I. trifidaGenomeMx23HmYoung leaves77,400512,990,8856,62842,586IlluminaHiSeq2000SOAPdenovo2r223GapCloser 1.10SSPACE2.0Hirakawa et al. (2015)
Genome0431-1Young leaves181,194712,155,5873,93036,283IlluminaHiSeq2000SOAPdenovo2r223GapCloser 1.10SSPACE2.0Hirakawa et al. (2015)
TranscriptDLP4597root, leaf, stem and flower90,6841,784IlluminaHiSeq2000TrinityCao et al. (2016)

Sweetpotato (I. batatas (L.) Lam)ESTsJinhongmiyoung storage roots2,859ShimadzuRISA-384You et al. (2003)
TranscriptTanzaniaShoots66418 (31,685 contigs + 34,733 singletons)25,048,392 (contigs)790 (contigs)Roche 454FLXTITANIUMNGenSchafleitner et al. (2010)
TranscriptJingshu 6swelling tuberous roots473,238 (contigs)121,084 (Scaffolds)58,800 (Unigenes)65,542,302 (contigs)36,640,480 (Scaffolds)27,970,067 (Unigenes)138 (contigs)303 (Scaffolds)476 (Unigenes)118 (contigs)393 (Scaffolds)552 (Unigenes)IlluminaHiSeq2000SOAPdenovoXie et al. (2012)
TranscriptXushu 18young leaves, mature leaves, stems, fibrous roots, initial tuberous roots, expanding tuberous roots, harvest tuberous roots128,05241.13M321509Illumina GA IIVelvet v1.0.12SOAPdenovov1.04CAP3Tao et al. (2012)
TranscriptXushu 18whole opened flowers and previously published transcripts in leaves, stems and roots70,412628895IlluminaHiSeq2000SOAPdenovo v1.3Oases v0.1.20CAP3Tao et al. (2013)
TranscriptWeiduoliHVB-3storage roots1,557,001 (contigs)58,277 (Transcripts)35,909 (Unigenes)91,371,759 (contigs)34,741,399 (Transcripts)19,150,802 (Unigenes)58 (contigs)596 (Transcripts)533 (Unigenes)58 (contigs)767 (Transcripts)669 (Unigenes)IlluminaHiSeq2000Trinity, Inchworm, Chrysalis, ButterflyLi et al. (2015b)
ChloroplastXushu 18Young leaves1161,303IlluminaHiSeq2000 and GAIIEdena v2.1.1SOAPdenovo2r240Velvet v1.0.12Yan et al. (2015)
BAC-end sequencesXu 781Young leaves11,5427.595,261658ABI PRISM3730 DNAAnalyzerSi et al. (2016)
In addition, the transcriptome sequences of I. trifida were recently published by Cao . A total of 66,329,578 PE reads derived from root, leaf, stem and flower tissues were sequenced by using the Illumina platform, and de novo assembly generated 90,684 transcripts. The transcripts were annotated by similarity searches against the NCBI NR database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), the gene ontology (GO) terms (http://www.geneontology.org), Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathways (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/), known transcription factors and protein kinases. The obtained sequences were used for demonstration of the SSR marker design and cloning of a potential drought-tolerance gene, ItWRKY1.

Genome sequences of I. nil (Japanese morning glory)

I. nil is another possible reference species of sweetpotato, it has been used as a model plant in genetics because of its large number of mutant lines. The draft genome sequences covering 98% of the 750 Mb genome were recently published by Hoshino with a scaffold N50 of 2.88 Mb. Of the assembled genomes, 91.4% were anchored to 15 pseudo-chromosomes. These are the first pseudo-chromosomes constructed for the genus Ipomoea. Gene prediction based on the transcript sequences of the leaves, flowers, embryos, stems, roots and seed coats generated a total of 42,783 gene models. Phylogenetic analysis with a 1,353 single copy gene estimated that the divergence of I. nil from the other Solanales members (Solanaceae) occurred approximately 75.25 Myr ago. Though the genetic distance of I. nil to sweetpotato is longer than that of I. trifida, the high quality draft genome sequences would be a useful reference source for genetic and genomic sweetpotato analysis.

Transcript sequences in sweetpotato

The large-scale cDNA sequences in sweetpotato were first reported by You for the identification of genes related to the initiation of storage root development. A total of 2,859 cDNA clones derived from early stage storage roots were assembled into 483 clusters and 442 singletons. By the year 2010, approximately 22,000 expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences had been registered (Schafleitner ). First transcript sequencing using the NGS platform (454 pyrosequencing) was reported in 2010 (Schafleitner et al.) for designing gene-based microsatellite markers. The 524,209 transcript sequence reads derived from cDNA collections of stems and leaves from drought-stressed sweetpotato were assembled with 22,094 published ESTs, and generated 31,685 sets of overlapping DNA segments and 34,733 unassembled sequences. A total of 24,657 putatively unique genes were annotated by BLASTX search with the UniRef100 database (http://www.uniprot.org), and 1,661 gene-based microsatellite sequences were identified in the unique genes. The transcript and genome sequences were also used for SNP identification (Meng , Xu ) and its application to tetra-primer Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS)-PCR to identify SNP alleles on agarose gels. Large-scale de novo transcript sequencing was also performed to identify putative genes and for differential gene expression analysis. De novo transcriptome sequencing was performed by using RNA extracted from tuberous roots of Jingshu 6, a purple sweetpotato variety (Xie ). Of the 58,800 obtained unigenes, 40,280 were identified as protein-coding genes. Based on GO and KEGG analysis, at least 3,553 genes were considered to be involved in the biosynthesis pathways of starch, alkaloids, anthocyanin pigments, and vitamins. In addition, a total of 851 SSR were identified in the unigenes. The first digital gene expression (DGE) analysis in sweetpotato was reported by Tao for seven tissue samples of young leaves, mature leaves, stems, fibrous roots, initial tuberous roots, expanding tuberous roots and harvest tuberous roots by using the Illumina GAII platform. A total of 128,052 transcripts (≥100 bp) were subjected to annotation by Blast2GO (https://www.blast2go.com), BLASTX (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), GO and KEGG analysis. The research group was also performed for the transcript sequences obtained from the seven tissues in order to clarify the tissue-specific gene expression. Furthermore, Tao performed RNA-Seq by using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform for whole opened flowers of sweetpotato, cv. Xushu 18, to identify putative floral-specific and flowering regulatory-related genes. A total of 2,595 and 2,928 putative floral-specific and vegetative-specific transcript sequences, respectively, were obtained and transcripts similar to the key genes in the flowering regulation network of Arabidopsis thaliana were identified. In a later work, Li performed transcriptome sequencing of an orange-fleshed sweetpotato cultivar, Weiduoli, and its mutant, HVB-3, for application to differentially expressed gene analysis (DEG) related to carotenoid biosynthesis. A total of 58,277 transcripts and 35,909 unigenes were assembled from the Illumina RNA-Seq reads of storage roots. Between the two lines, 874 DEGs were obtained and 22 DEGs and 31 transcription factors were considered to be involved in carotenoid biosynthesis.

Chloroplast sequences

The complete nucleotide sequence of the chloroplast (cp) genome of sweetpotato was reported by Yan . A circular molecule of 161,303 bp in length was constructed as a quadripartite structure with large and small single-copy regions. A total of 145 putative genes were identified, including 94 protein-encoding genes. By comparing the chloroplast sequences of 33 species, including I. nil and I. trifida, gene-flow events and gene-gain-and-loss events were identified at the intra- and inter-species levels. RNA-editing events and differential expressions of the chloroplast functional genes were also identified by DEG analysis.

Transposal elements and transfer DNA

Transposable elements (TEs) affect genetic diversity through the replications and movements in a genome. An active element of the Ty1-copia retrotransposon family was identified in the sweetpotato genome by Tahara . Monden further developed screening methods for long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons that show high insertion polymorphisms in strawberry. By using this approach, Monden identified a large number of Rtsp-1 retrotransposon insertion sites, and constructed a linkage map by using retrotransposon insertion polymorphisms. Meanwhile, Yan performed a large-scale TE identification by de novo assembly of four published sweetpotato transcriptome databases. A total of 1,405 TEs were identified, including 883 retrotransposons and 552 DNA transposons. Illumina DGE profiling of seven tissues of Xushu 18 revealed that 107 TEs were expressed in all seven tissues, while 417 TEs were expressed in one or more tissues. The report of Kyndt created a sensation in the realm of sweetpotato research. While assembling small interfering RNAs, Kyndt et al. discovered that the sweetpotato genome contained Agrobacterium transfer DNAs (T-DNAs) with expressed genes and that sweetpotato was a naturally transgenic crop. They performed simple and quantitative PCR, Southern blotting, genome walking and bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library screening and sequencing, and revealed that two T-DNA regions were expressed in different tissues of sweetpotato. One of the T-DNA regions was present in 291 tested sweetpotato accessions, but not in I. tabascana, I. trifida or I. triloba. Therefore it was considered that Agrobacterium infection occurred in evolutionary times and the T-DNA provided traits that were selected for during domestication.

Challenges to genome sequence dissection in sweetpotato

BAC-end sequences (BESs) were just recently published by Si . Both ends of 8,310 BAC clones randomly selected from the 240,384 clones were sequenced by the Sanger method (ABI PRISM 3730 DNA Analyzer). The total length obtained was 7,595,261 bp, average length of 658 bp. Based on the analysis of BESs, the sweetpotato genome was estimated as consisting of 10.0% of coding regions, 18.3% of sweetpotato-unique repetitive DNA and 12.17% of known repetitive DNA, including 7.37% LTR retrotransposons, 1.15% Non-LTR retrotransposons and 1.42% Class II DNA transposons etc. The genome sequencing of sweetpotato was recently reported in a non-peer review journal (Yang ). The authors of that report proposed construction of haplotype-resolved genome sequences by performing SNP phasing. A total of ~824 Mb assembly was generated from at least 40-fold monoploid genome coverage obtained by Illumina HiSeq 2500 and Roche GS FLX+ platforms. Though the total length of the assembled sequences was less than 30% of the total length of the haplotype genome (approximately 3 Gb), the possibility of such assembly is worth considering. To our knowledge, further two international research groups have tried to develop genomic resources for sweetpotato (Fei 2016, Yoon ). One is the Trilateral Research Association of Sweetpotato (TRAS) genome sequencing consortium. The consortium was launched in 2012 and consists of six organizations, the Jiangsu Xuzhou Sweetpotato Research Center (China), China Agricultural University (China), Rural Development Administration (Korea), Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (Korea), National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (Japan) and Kazusa DNA Research Institute (Japan). The consortium members agreed on the genome sequencing of sweetpotato cultivar Xushu 18 and performed de novo whole genome sequencing, transcript analysis, and linkage map construction by using Illumina and PacBio sequences. The other research group is The Genomic Tools for Sweetpotato (GT4SP) Improvement Project for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This project was founded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation with a funding amount of more than 12M USD (http://www.sweetpotatoknowledge.org/project/genomic-tools-for-sweetpotato-improvement-gt4sp/). However, it is not the aim of this project to sequence the sweetpotato genome. Rather, the project seeks to conduct high quality I. trifida genome sequencing and to develop a genome sequence-based marker platform for sweetpotato improvement. Seven organizations are involved in the project: the International Potato Center (CIP), two universities in the USA, an institute in the USA, an institute in Australia and a research organization and institute in the SSA. Polyploidy is commonly observed in plant species and can be advantageous (Comai 2005). Despite the importance the genome assembly of polyploid species has been left behind because of its complexity. Meanwhile, novel approaches for genome assembly applicable in polyploidy species were recently proposed (Aguiar and Istrail 2013, Ming and Man Wai 2015). The key point of the approaches is distinction of haploid genomes by using local haplotypes. Together with the development of bioinformatics approaches, the large-scale publically available genome and transcript sequence resources and the international genome sequencing streams are expected to promote the genome sequence dissection in sweetpotato.
  31 in total

1.  De novo sequencing and a comprehensive analysis of purple sweet potato (Impomoea batatas L.) transcriptome.

Authors:  Fuliang Xie; Caitlin E Burklew; Yanfang Yang; Min Liu; Peng Xiao; Baohong Zhang; Deyou Qiu
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 2.  The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid.

Authors:  Luca Comai
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Isolation of an active element from a high-copy-number family of retrotransposons in the sweetpotato genome.

Authors:  M Tahara; T Aoki; S Suzuka; H Yamashita; M Tanaka; S Matsunaga; S Kokumai
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 3.291

4.  Scanning of transposable elements and analyzing expression of transposase genes of sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas].

Authors:  Lang Yan; Ying-Hong Gu; Xiang Tao; Xian-Jun Lai; Yi-Zheng Zhang; Xue-Mei Tan; Haiyan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Genome sequence of cultivated Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum TM-1) provides insights into genome evolution.

Authors:  Fuguang Li; Guangyi Fan; Cairui Lu; Guanghui Xiao; Changsong Zou; Russell J Kohel; Zhiying Ma; Haihong Shang; Xiongfeng Ma; Jianyong Wu; Xinming Liang; Gai Huang; Richard G Percy; Kun Liu; Weihua Yang; Wenbin Chen; Xiongming Du; Chengcheng Shi; Youlu Yuan; Wuwei Ye; Xin Liu; Xueyan Zhang; Weiqing Liu; Hengling Wei; Shoujun Wei; Guodong Huang; Xianlong Zhang; Shuijin Zhu; He Zhang; Fengming Sun; Xingfen Wang; Jie Liang; Jiahao Wang; Qiang He; Leihuan Huang; Jun Wang; Jinjie Cui; Guoli Song; Kunbo Wang; Xun Xu; John Z Yu; Yuxian Zhu; Shuxun Yu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Draft genome of the wheat A-genome progenitor Triticum urartu.

Authors:  Hong-Qing Ling; Shancen Zhao; Dongcheng Liu; Junyi Wang; Hua Sun; Chi Zhang; Huajie Fan; Dong Li; Lingli Dong; Yong Tao; Chuan Gao; Huilan Wu; Yiwen Li; Yan Cui; Xiaosen Guo; Shusong Zheng; Biao Wang; Kang Yu; Qinsi Liang; Wenlong Yang; Xueyuan Lou; Jie Chen; Mingji Feng; Jianbo Jian; Xiaofei Zhang; Guangbin Luo; Ying Jiang; Junjie Liu; Zhaobao Wang; Yuhui Sha; Bairu Zhang; Huajun Wu; Dingzhong Tang; Qianhua Shen; Pengya Xue; Shenhao Zou; Xiujie Wang; Xin Liu; Famin Wang; Yanping Yang; Xueli An; Zhenying Dong; Kunpu Zhang; Xiangqi Zhang; Ming-Cheng Luo; Jan Dvorak; Yiping Tong; Jian Wang; Huanming Yang; Zhensheng Li; Daowen Wang; Aimin Zhang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Plant genetics. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome.

Authors:  Boulos Chalhoub; France Denoeud; Shengyi Liu; Isobel A P Parkin; Haibao Tang; Xiyin Wang; Julien Chiquet; Harry Belcram; Chaobo Tong; Birgit Samans; Margot Corréa; Corinne Da Silva; Jérémy Just; Cyril Falentin; Chu Shin Koh; Isabelle Le Clainche; Maria Bernard; Pascal Bento; Benjamin Noel; Karine Labadie; Adriana Alberti; Mathieu Charles; Dominique Arnaud; Hui Guo; Christian Daviaud; Salman Alamery; Kamel Jabbari; Meixia Zhao; Patrick P Edger; Houda Chelaifa; David Tack; Gilles Lassalle; Imen Mestiri; Nicolas Schnel; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Guangyi Fan; Victor Renault; Philippe E Bayer; Agnieszka A Golicz; Sahana Manoli; Tae-Ho Lee; Vinh Ha Dinh Thi; Smahane Chalabi; Qiong Hu; Chuchuan Fan; Reece Tollenaere; Yunhai Lu; Christophe Battail; Jinxiong Shen; Christine H D Sidebottom; Xinfa Wang; Aurélie Canaguier; Aurélie Chauveau; Aurélie Bérard; Gwenaëlle Deniot; Mei Guan; Zhongsong Liu; Fengming Sun; Yong Pyo Lim; Eric Lyons; Christopher D Town; Ian Bancroft; Xiaowu Wang; Jinling Meng; Jianxin Ma; J Chris Pires; Graham J King; Dominique Brunel; Régine Delourme; Michel Renard; Jean-Marc Aury; Keith L Adams; Jacqueline Batley; Rod J Snowdon; Jorg Tost; David Edwards; Yongming Zhou; Wei Hua; Andrew G Sharpe; Andrew H Paterson; Chunyun Guan; Patrick Wincker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Digital gene expression analysis based on integrated de novo transcriptome assembly of sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam].

Authors:  Xiang Tao; Ying-Hong Gu; Hai-Yan Wang; Wen Zheng; Xiao Li; Chuan-Wu Zhao; Yi-Zheng Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Survey of genome sequences in a wild sweet potato, Ipomoea trifida (H. B. K.) G. Don.

Authors:  Hideki Hirakawa; Yoshihiro Okada; Hiroaki Tabuchi; Kenta Shirasawa; Akiko Watanabe; Hisano Tsuruoka; Chiharu Minami; Shinobu Nakayama; Shigemi Sasamoto; Mitsuyo Kohara; Yoshie Kishida; Tsunakazu Fujishiro; Midori Kato; Keiko Nanri; Akiko Komaki; Masaru Yoshinaga; Yasuhiro Takahata; Masaru Tanaka; Satoshi Tabata; Sachiko N Isobe
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Genome sequence and analysis of the Japanese morning glory Ipomoea nil.

Authors:  Atsushi Hoshino; Vasanthan Jayakumar; Eiji Nitasaka; Atsushi Toyoda; Hideki Noguchi; Takehiko Itoh; Tadasu Shin-I; Yohei Minakuchi; Yuki Koda; Atsushi J Nagano; Masaki Yasugi; Mie N Honjo; Hiroshi Kudoh; Motoaki Seki; Asako Kamiya; Toshiyuki Shiraki; Piero Carninci; Erika Asamizu; Hiroyo Nishide; Sachiko Tanaka; Kyeung-Il Park; Yasumasa Morita; Kohei Yokoyama; Ikuo Uchiyama; Yoshikazu Tanaka; Satoshi Tabata; Kazuo Shinozaki; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Yuji Kohara; Yutaka Suzuki; Sumio Sugano; Asao Fujiyama; Shigeru Iida; Yasubumi Sakakibara
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  10 in total

1.  Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Expansin Gene Family in the Storage Root Development of Diploid Wild Sweetpotato Ipomoea trifida.

Authors:  Ming Li; Lianfu Chen; Tao Lang; Huijuan Qu; Cong Zhang; Junyan Feng; Zhigang Pu; Meifang Peng; Honghui Lin
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.141

2.  De novo assembly of the complete mitochondrial genome of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam) revealed the existence of homologous conformations generated by the repeat-mediated recombination.

Authors:  Zhijian Yang; Yang Ni; Zebin Lin; Liubin Yang; Guotai Chen; Nuerla Nijiati; Yunzhuo Hu; Xuanyang Chen
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.260

Review 3.  Functional components in sweetpotato and their genetic improvement.

Authors:  Masaru Tanaka; Koji Ishiguro; Tomoyuki Oki; Shigenori Okuno
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 4.  Recent progress in sweetpotato breeding and cultivars for diverse applications in Japan.

Authors:  Kenji Katayama; Akira Kobayashi; Tetsufumi Sakai; Toshikazu Kuranouchi; Yumi Kai
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Mapping of Nematode Resistance in Hexaploid Sweetpotato Using an Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Association Study.

Authors:  Nozomi Obata; Hiroaki Tabuchi; Miyu Kurihara; Eiji Yamamoto; Kenta Shirasawa; Yuki Monden
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Lens ervoides and comparison to Lens culinaris.

Authors:  Nurbanu Tayşi; Yasin Kaymaz; Duygu Ateş; Hatice Sari; Cengiz Toker; M Bahattin Tanyolaç
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Conservation of polypyrimidine tract binding proteins and their putative target RNAs in several storage root crops.

Authors:  Kirtikumar R Kondhare; Amit Kumar; David J Hannapel; Anjan K Banerjee
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Root-zone-specific sensitivity of K+-and Ca2+-permeable channels to H2O2 determines ion homeostasis in salinized diploid and hexaploid Ipomoea trifida.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yicheng Yu; Jianying Sun; Qinghe Cao; Zhonghou Tang; Meiyan Liu; Tao Xu; Daifu Ma; Zongyun Li; Jian Sun
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  Development of molecular markers associated with resistance to Meloidogyne incognita by performing quantitative trait locus analysis and genome-wide association study in sweetpotato.

Authors:  Rumi Sasai; Hiroaki Tabuchi; Kenta Shirasawa; Kazuki Kishimoto; Shusei Sato; Yoshihiro Okada; Akihide Kuramoto; Akira Kobayashi; Sachiko Isobe; Makoto Tahara; Yuki Monden
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Single-molecule real-time sequencing identifies massive full-length cDNAs and alternative-splicing events that facilitate comparative and functional genomics study in the hexaploid crop sweet potato.

Authors:  Na Ding; Huihui Cui; Ying Miao; Jun Tang; Qinghe Cao; Yonghai Luo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.