| Literature DB >> 28465588 |
Ruihua Tang1,2,3, Hui Yang4,5, Yan Gong3,6,7, Zhi Liu3,8, XiuJun Li9, Ting Wen7, ZhiGuo Qu8, Sufeng Zhang10, Qibing Mei1,2, Feng Xu11,12.
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a serious public health problem, which can be transmitted through various routes (e.g., blood donation) and cause hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and liver cancer. Hence, it is necessary to do diagnostic screening for high-risk HBV patients in these transmission routes. Nowadays, protein-based technologies have been used for HBV testing, which however involve the issues of large sample volume, antibody instability and poor specificity. Nucleic acid hybridization-based lateral flow assay (LFA) holds great potential to address these limitations due to its low-cost, rapid, and simple features, but the poor analytical sensitivity of LFA restricts its application. In this study, we developed a low-cost, simple and easy-to-use method to improve analytical sensitivity by integrating sponge shunt into LFA to decrease the fluid flow rate. The thickness, length and hydrophobicity of the sponge shunt were sequentially optimized, and achieved 10-fold signal enhancement in nucleic acid testing of HBV as compared to the unmodified LFA. The enhancement was further confirmed by using HBV clinical samples, where we achieved the detection limit of 103 copies/ml as compared to 104 copies/ml in unmodified LFA. The improved LFA holds great potential for diseases diagnostics, food safety control and environment monitoring at point-of-care.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28465588 PMCID: PMC5431006 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01558-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The schematic of improvement the analytical sensitivity of LFA by sponge. The schematic of the unmodified LFA (A), the modified LFA (B) and the optimization parameters of sponge shunt (C).
Figure 2Analytical sensitivity improvement of LFA by different thickness of the sponge. The detection limit of unmodified LFA is 1 nM (A), 1 mm of sponge thickness is 1 nM (B), 2 mm of sponge thickness is 0.5 nM (C) and 3 mm of sponge thickness is 0.5 nM (D). (E) The optical density of LFA test line under different thicknesses of sponge. (F) The wicking distance on the NC membrane with time at different sponge shunt thicknesses. (G) The relationship between the experimental data and simulation data. Three replicates were performed for the optimization experiments for high concentrations in the range of 2.5–50 nM (N = 3), while eight replicates were performed for lower concentrations in the range of 0.05–1 nM (N = 8).
Figure 3Analytical sensitivity improvement of LFA by different lengths of sponge. The detection limit of unmodified LFA is 1 nM (A), 3 mm of sponge length is 0.5 nM (B), 5 mm of sponge length is 0.5 nM (C) and 7 mm of sponge length is 0.25 nM (D). (E) The optical density of LFA test line under different lengths of sponge. (F) The wicking distance on the NC membrane with time at different sponge shunt lengths. (G) The relationship between the experimental data and simulation data. Three replicates were performed for the optimization experiments for high concentrations in the range of 2.5–50 nM (N = 3), while eight replicates were performed for lower concentrations in the range of 0.05–1 nM (N = 8).
Figure 4Analytical sensitivity improvement of LFA by different contact angles of liquid on the sponge. The detection limit of unmodified LFA is 1 nM (A), 23.5° (30% Tween 20) of contact angle is 0.5 nM (B), 50° (20% Tween 20) of contact angle is 0.25 nM (C) and 68.5° (10% Tween 20) of contact angle is 0.01 nM (D). (E) The optical density of LFA test line under different contact angles of liquid on the sponge. (F) The wicking distance on the NC membrane with time at different contact angles sponge shunt. (G) The relationship between the experimental data and simulation data. Three replicates were performed for the optimization experiments for high concentrations in the range of 2.5–50 nM (N = 3), while eight replicates were performed for lower concentrations in the range of 0.05–1 nM (N = 8).
Figure 5HBV clinical sample detection using unmodified LFA and modified LFA. (A) (a) HBV positive serum was detected by normal model, (b) HBV positive serum was detected by modified model, (c) the optical density of LFA test line in normal model and modified model. (B) 12 of clinical blood samples were detected by (a) the electrophoresis, (b) the normal model and the modified model, (c) the optical density of LFA test line in unmodified model and modified model. Eight replicates were performed for lower concentrations in the range of 102–105 copies/ml (N = 8).