Literature DB >> 28465028

The technique for 3D printing patient-specific models for auricular reconstruction.

Roberto L Flores1, Hannah Liss2, Samuel Raffaelli2, Aiza Humayun2, Kimberly S Khouri3, Paulo G Coelho4, Lukasz Witek5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Currently, surgeons approach autogenous microtia repair by creating a two-dimensional (2D) tracing of the unaffected ear to approximate a three-dimensional (3D) construct, a difficult process. To address these shortcomings, this study introduces the fabrication of patient-specific, sterilizable 3D printed auricular model for autogenous auricular reconstruction.
METHODS: A high-resolution 3D digital photograph was captured of the patient's unaffected ear and surrounding anatomic structures. The photographs were exported and uploaded into Amira, for transformation into a digital (.stl) model, which was imported into Blender, an open source software platform for digital modification of data. The unaffected auricle as digitally isolated and inverted to render a model for the contralateral side. The depths of the scapha, triangular fossa, and cymba were deepened to accentuate their contours. Extra relief was added to the helical root to further distinguish this structure. The ear was then digitally deconstructed and separated into its individual auricular components for reconstruction. The completed ear and its individual components were 3D printed using polylactic acid filament and sterilized following manufacturer specifications.
RESULTS: The sterilized models were brought to the operating room to be utilized by the surgeon. The models allowed for more accurate anatomic measurements compared to 2D tracings, which reduced the degree of estimation required by surgeons. Approximately 20 g of the PLA filament were utilized for the construction of these models, yielding a total material cost of approximately $1.
CONCLUSION: Using the methodology detailed in this report, as well as departmentally available resources (3D digital photography and 3D printing), a sterilizable, patient-specific, and inexpensive 3D auricular model was fabricated to be used intraoperatively. This technique of printing customized-to-patient models for surgeons to use as 'guides' shows great promise.
Copyright © 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D Imaging; 3D Printing; Patient Specific; Reconstruction; Surgical Tools; Techniques

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28465028     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  16 in total

1.  Application of three-dimensional reconstruction and printing as an elective course for undergraduate medical students: an exploratory trial.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Zhang; Zhou Xu; Liwen Tan; Ying Li; Li Liu; Na Chen; Shaoxiang Zhang; Wouter H Lamers; Chunling Wu; Yi Wu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Three-Dimensional Printing for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Chen Shen; Lukasz Witek; Roberto L Flores; Nick Tovar; Andrea Torroni; Paulo G Coelho; F Kurtis Kasper; Mark Wong; Simon Young
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  The role of 3D printing in treating craniomaxillofacial congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Lukasz Witek; Andrea Torroni; Roberto L Flores; David B Demissie; Simon Young; Bruce N Cronstein; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Application of 3D printing technology to thoracic wall tumor resection and thoracic wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Yi Wu; Na Chen; Zhou Xu; Xiaoqin Zhang; Li Liu; Chunling Wu; Shaoxiang Zhang; Yan Song; Tao Wu; Hongxiang Liu; Meng Tang; Wei Wu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  The cutting edge of customized surgery: 3D-printed models for patient-specific interventions in otology and auricular management-a systematic review.

Authors:  Adam Omari; Martin Frendø; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen; Andreas Frithioff
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Microtia Ear Reconstruction with Patient-Specific 3D Models-A Segmentation Protocol.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Rodríguez-Arias; Alessandro Gutiérrez Venturini; Marta María Pampín Martínez; Elena Gómez García; Jesús Manuel Muñoz Caro; Maria San Basilio; Mercedes Martín Pérez; José Luis Cebrián Carretero
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Recent Advances in 3D Printing of Aliphatic Polyesters.

Authors:  Ioana Chiulan; Adriana Nicoleta Frone; Călin Brandabur; Denis Mihaela Panaitescu
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-24

8.  Engineering a 3D-Bioprinted Model of Human Heart Valve Disease Using Nanoindentation-Based Biomechanics.

Authors:  Dewy C van der Valk; Casper F T van der Ven; Mark C Blaser; Joshua M Grolman; Pin-Jou Wu; Owen S Fenton; Lang H Lee; Mark W Tibbitt; Jason L Andresen; Jennifer R Wen; Anna H Ha; Fabrizio Buffolo; Alain van Mil; Carlijn V C Bouten; Simon C Body; David J Mooney; Joost P G Sluijter; Masanori Aikawa; Jesper Hjortnaes; Robert Langer; Elena Aikawa
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 5.076

9.  DICOM segmentation and STL creation for 3D printing: a process and software package comparison for osseous anatomy.

Authors:  Takashi Kamio; Madoka Suzuki; Rieko Asaumi; Taisuke Kawai
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2020-07-31

Review 10.  [Regeneration - A New Therapeutic Dimension in Otorhinolaryngology].

Authors:  Nicole Rotter; Marcy Zenobi-Wong
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.