| Literature DB >> 28461998 |
Roman A Blaheta1,2, Anton Oertl3,2, Hans-Joachim Freisleben4, Karen Nelson5, Hanns Ackermann6, Axel Haferkamp1, Tobias Engl1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Ureter obstruction caused by a retro-peritoneal tumor is treated by inserting an indwelling ureter splint (DJ-stent). Indwelling duration is limited by cumulative crystalline deposits into the splint, eventually causing the repeated impairment of urine flow. Deciding when a DJ-stent must be replaced is important since belated removal can be accompanied by severe complications. X-ray or conventional sonography do not allow satisfactory evaluation of early incrustation, therefore, the use of sonographic twinkling artifacts (TA) to provide accurate stent surveillance was investigated.Entities:
Keywords: DJ-stent; color Doppler; encrusted urologic implant; hydronephrosis; stent incrustation; tumor lysis syndrome; twinkling-artifact
Year: 2017 PMID: 28461998 PMCID: PMC5407330 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2017.912
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cent European J Urol ISSN: 2080-4806
Figure 1Minor stent incrustation at the distal end (urinary bladder) of a DJ-stent, removed six weeks after implantation (upper picture). Twinkling artifacts (TAs) appear as colored spots on the pigtail, but not on the polyurethane stent itself (lower picture). Sonography in water bath. B. Minimal stent incrustation of intra-renal pigtail (upper picture). Lower picture, right shows stent after explantation. Lower picture left, is X-ray image of the same explanted stent. Incrustation is not apparent. C. Distinct TA at the distal intra-vesical pigtail of the ureter splint (urinary bladder) with detectable incrustation in the intramural course of the ureter (extra-luminary). D. Explanted ureter splint with massive incrustation (primarily phosphates). E: X-ray image of the same explanted ureter splint (D) showing no visible incrustation.
Appearance of twinkling artifacts (TAs) in indwelling ureter splints as well as urine pH and serum levels of uric acid and creatinine
| Male | Female | Age (years) | Disease | TA-appearance (weeks after implantation) | pH of urine | Uric acid [mg/dL] | Creatinine [mg/dL] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | 33 | seminoma | 3 | 5.0 | 6.2 | 1.0 | |
| X | 45 | seminoma | 7 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 1.4 | |
| X | 54 | RCC, c.a. KTX | 5 | 6.0 | 9.6 | 2.4 | |
| X | 58 | RCC | 6 | 7.5 | 7.1 | 2.3 | |
| X | 75 | urothel-Ca | 4 | 5.0 | 4.1 | 0.6 | |
| X | 62 | ovarial-Ca | 3 | 6.0 | 7.2 | 0.8 | |
| X | 64 | ML | 5 | 5.5 | 6.8 | 0.7 | |
| X | 77 | bronchial-Ca | 8 | 6.5 | 7.3 | 0.9 | |
| X | 73 | ALL | 10 | 5.5 | 6.7 | 0.7 | |
| X | 53 | CLL | >12 | 7.0 | 7.4 | 0.7 | |
| X | 85 | NHL | 8 | 6.5 | 5.1 | 0.9 | |
| X | 65 | CUP | 4 | 7.5 | 10.2 | 1.3 | |
| X | 56 | vaginal-Ca | >12 | 7.0 | 5.8 | 0.6 | |
| X | 76 | colon-Ca | 3 | 5.5 | 7.8 | 1.8 | |
| X | 66 | GIST | 4 | 5.5 | 7.2 | 1.5 | |
| X | 68 | CUP | 8 | 7.0 | 6.3 | 1.3 | |
| X | 71 | GIST | 7 | 8.0 | 7.2 | 1.3 | |
| X | 59 | CUP | 10 | 5.5 | 6.2 | 0.7 | |
| X | 60 | colon-Ca | 2 | 7.0 | 9.7 | 3.8 | |
| X | 77 | AML | >12 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 1.0 | |
| X | 66 | CUP | 9 | 5.5 | 7.4 | 1.5 | |
| X | 56 | vaginal-Ca | 6 | 6.0 | 2.3 | 0.8 | |
| X | 73 | urothel-Ca | 1 | 6.5 | 11.7 | 2.9 | |
| X | 86 | NHL | 2 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 2.3 | |
| X | 57 | ovarial-Ca | 6 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 0.9 | |
| X | 48 | NHL | 9 | 5.5 | 4.7 | 0.8 |
RCC – renal cell carcinoma; c.a. KTX – condition after kidney transplantation; Ca – carcinoma; leukemias (among others), ML, ALL, CLL, NHL, AML; CUP – cancer of unknown primary; GIST – gastrointestinal stroma tumor
Figure 2Time between stent placement and appearance of twinkling artifacts (TAs) as a function of serum creatinine.