Literature DB >> 14513227

[Management of "forgotten" DJ stent].

H-J Knopf1.   

Abstract

Double J (DJ)stents are a comfortable method for assuring urine passage with little or no burden for the patient. However, the lack of or minimal impairment of physical activity has the disadvantage that an inserted DJ stent can be "forgotten". In cases of encrustation, stent removal can be impossible or a stent can tear off. To remove encrusted stents all modern, minimally invasive endourological techniques are used. In rare cases, surgical procedures are essential. To avoid these difficulties, patients with DJ stents have to be closely checked to recognize the beginning of encrustation as early as possible. The removal of DJ stents should be carried out as early as possible in patients for whom they are required only short-term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14513227     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-003-0412-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  9 in total

1.  Incorporation of a forgotten stent into the ureteral wall.

Authors:  K D Ivil; G Suresh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Ureteral J stents: followup is not optional.

Authors:  L Nora
Journal:  Urol Nurs       Date:  2000-06

3.  Extraction by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of a forgotten ureteric stent after cystectomy.

Authors:  J A Thomas; N J Fenn; A Ponsford; W G Bowsher
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1998-04

4.  Late complications of ureteral stents.

Authors:  A Ringel; S Richter; M Shalev; I Nissenkorn
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Severely encrusted polyurethane ureteral stents: management and analysis of potential risk factors.

Authors:  I Singh; N P Gupta; A K Hemal; M Aron; A Seth; P N Dogra
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Endourological management of severely encrusted ureteral stents.

Authors:  K Mohan-Pillai; F X Keeley; S A Moussa; G Smith; D A Tolley
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Current management of severely encrusted ureteral stents with a large associated stone burden.

Authors:  P G Borboroglu; C J Kane
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Factors affecting the fate of prolonged forgotten 'J' stents.

Authors:  E O Kehinde; K A Al-Awadi; A Tawheed; A Al-Hunayan; Y Ali; A H Mahmoud
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001-06

9.  The indwelling ureteric stent: a 'friendly' procedure with unfriendly high morbidity.

Authors:  S Richter; A Ringel; M Shalev; I Nissenkorn
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.588

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: technique-indications-complications.

Authors:  Klaus Armin Hausegger; Horst Rupert Portugaller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Detection of early DJ-stent encrustation by sonographic twinkling-artifacts - a pilot study.

Authors:  Roman A Blaheta; Anton Oertl; Hans-Joachim Freisleben; Karen Nelson; Hanns Ackermann; Axel Haferkamp; Tobias Engl
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-03-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.