Literature DB >> 28461440

Who is reducing their material consumption and why? A cross-cultural analysis of dematerialization behaviours.

Lorraine Whitmarsh1, Stuart Capstick2, Nicholas Nash2.   

Abstract

The environmental and economic imperatives to dematerialize economies, or 'do more with less', have been established for some years. Yet, to date, little is known about the personal drivers associated with dematerializing. This paper explores the prevalence and profile of those who are taking action to reduce consumption in different cultural contexts (UK and Brazil) and considers influences on dematerialization behaviours. We find that exemplar behaviours (avoiding buying new things and avoiding packaging) are far less common than archetypal environmental behaviours (e.g. recycling), but also that cultural context is important (Brazilians are more likely to reduce their material consumption than people in the UK). We also find that the two dematerialization behaviours are associated with different pro-environmental actions (more radical action versus green consumption, respectively); and have distinct, but overlapping, psychological (e.g. identity) and socio-demographic (e.g. education) predictors. Comparing a more traditional value-identity model of pro-environmental behaviour with a motivation-based (self-determination) model, we find that the latter explains somewhat more variance than the former. However, overall, little variance is explained, suggesting that additional factors at the personal and structural levels are important for determining these consumption behaviours. We conclude by outlining policy implications and avenues for further research.This article is part of the themed issue 'Material demand reduction'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  behaviour; cross-cultural; dematerialization; identity; self-determination; values

Year:  2017        PMID: 28461440      PMCID: PMC5415653          DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  8 in total

1.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions.

Authors:  Thomas Dietz; Gerald T Gardner; Jonathan Gilligan; Paul C Stern; Michael P Vandenbergh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The relationship between materialism and personal well-being: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Helga Dittmar; Rod Bond; Megan Hurst; Tim Kasser
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-11

3.  Exploring demand reduction through design, durability and 'usership' of fashion clothes.

Authors:  Kate Fletcher
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Material efficiency: providing material services with less material production.

Authors:  Julian M Allwood; Michael F Ashby; Timothy G Gutowski; Ernst Worrell
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  A low carbon economy and society.

Authors:  John Urry
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Environmental psychology matters.

Authors:  Robert Gifford
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 7.  Living both well and sustainably: a review of the literature, with some reflections on future research, interventions and policy.

Authors:  Tim Kasser
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Towards environmentally sustainable human behaviour: targeting non-conscious and conscious processes for effective and acceptable policies.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Demanding stories: television coverage of sustainability, climate change and material demand.

Authors:  Joe Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Industry 1.61803: the transition to an industry with reduced material demand fit for a low carbon future.

Authors:  Julian M Allwood; Timothy G Gutowski; André C Serrenho; Alexandra C H Skelton; Ernst Worrell
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Using the Multidimensional AIMES to Estimate Connection-to-Nature in an Australian Population: A Latent Class Approach to Segmentation.

Authors:  Bradley S Jorgensen; Julia Meis-Harris
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.