Literature DB >> 28461225

Bioelectrical brain effects of one's own voice identification in pitch of voice auditory feedback.

Oleg Korzyukov1, Alexander Bronder2, Yunseon Lee2, Sona Patel3, Charles R Larson2.   

Abstract

Control of voice fundamental frequency (F0) relies in part on comparison of the intended F0 level and auditory feedback. This comparison impacts "sense of agency", or SoA, commonly defined as being the agent of one's own actions and plays a key role for self-awareness and social interactions. SoA is aberrant in several psychiatric disorders. Knowledge about brain activity reflecting SoA can be used in clinical practice for these disorders. It was shown that perception of voice feedback as one's own voice, reflecting the recognition of SoA, alters auditory sensory processing. Using a voice perturbation paradigm we contrasted vocal and bioelectrical brain responses to auditory stimuli that differed in magnitude: 100 and 400 cents. Results suggest the different magnitudes were perceived as a pitch error in self-vocalization (100 cents) or as a pitch shift generated externally (400 cents). Vocalizations and neural responses to changes in pitch of self-vocalization were defined as those made to small magnitude pitch-shifts (100 cents) and which did not show differential neural responses to upward versus downward changes in voice pitch auditory feedback. Vocal responses to large magnitude pitch shifts (400 cents) were smaller than those made to small pitch shifts, and neural responses differed according to upwards versus downward changes in pitch. Our results suggest that the presence of SoA for self-produced sounds may modify bioelectrical brain responses reflecting differences in auditory processing of the direction of a pitch shift. We suggest that this modification of bioelectrical response can be used as a biological index of SoA. Possible neuronal mechanisms of this modification of bioelectrical brain response are discussed.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agency; Auditory processing; ERP; Pitch change; Voice

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28461225      PMCID: PMC5542569          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  104 in total

1.  Processing of frequency-modulated stimuli in the chick auditory cortex analogue: evidence for topographic representations and possible mechanisms of rate and directional sensitivity.

Authors:  P Heil; G Langner; H Scheich
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  I didn't mean to hurt you! Unconscious origins of experienced self-agency over others' emotions.

Authors:  Kirsten I Ruys; Henk Aarts
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-06-27

3.  The positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia reflect impairments in the perception and initiation of action.

Authors:  C D Frith
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Comparison of responses in the anterior and primary auditory fields of the ferret cortex.

Authors:  N Kowalski; H Versnel; S A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  First-rank symptoms in schizophrenia: reexamining mechanisms of self-recognition.

Authors:  Flavie A V Waters; Johanna C Badcock
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Exploring implicit and explicit aspects of sense of agency.

Authors:  J W Moore; D Middleton; P Haggard; P C Fletcher
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2012-11-08

Review 7.  Cortical encoding of pitch: recent results and open questions.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jennifer K Bizley; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Auditory cortical deactivation during speech production and following speech perception: an EEG investigation of the temporal dynamics of the auditory alpha rhythm.

Authors:  David Jenson; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; Andrew L Bowers; Tim Saltuklaroglu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Auditory feedback of one's own voice is used for high-level semantic monitoring: the "self-comprehension" hypothesis.

Authors:  Andreas Lind; Lars Hall; Björn Breidegard; Christian Balkenius; Petter Johansson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Sensory-motor transformations for speech occur bilaterally.

Authors:  Gregory B Cogan; Thomas Thesen; Chad Carlson; Werner Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; Bijan Pesaran
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

1.  Drifting pitch awareness after exposure to altered auditory feedback.

Authors:  Matthias K Franken; Robert J Hartsuiker; Petter Johansson; Lars Hall; Andreas Lind
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.157

2.  Temporal specificity of abnormal neural oscillations during phonatory events in laryngeal dystonia.

Authors:  Hardik Kothare; Sarah Schneider; Danielle Mizuiri; Leighton Hinkley; Abhishek Bhutada; Kamalini Ranasinghe; Susanne Honma; Coleman Garrett; David Klein; Molly Naunheim; Katherine Yung; Steven Cheung; Clark Rosen; Mark Courey; Srikantan Nagarajan; John Houde
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-02-11

3.  Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Sara-Ching Chao; Lacee C Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Responses to Auditory Feedback Manipulations in Speech May Be Affected by Previous Exposure to Auditory Errors.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Benjamin Parrell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Beta-band activity in medial prefrontal cortex predicts source memory encoding and retrieval accuracy.

Authors:  Karuna Subramaniam; Leighton B N Hinkley; Danielle Mizuiri; Hardik Kothare; Chang Cai; Coleman Garrett; Anne Findlay; John F Houde; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Adaptation to pitch-altered feedback is independent of one's own voice pitch sensitivity.

Authors:  Razieh Alemi; Alexandre Lehmann; Mickael L D Deroche
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Sensorimotor adaptation of speech depends on the direction of auditory feedback alteration.

Authors:  Hardik Kothare; Inez Raharjo; Vikram Ramanarayanan; Kamalini Ranasinghe; Benjamin Parrell; Keith Johnson; John F Houde; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Reality Monitoring and Feedback Control of Speech Production Are Related Through Self-Agency.

Authors:  Karuna Subramaniam; Hardik Kothare; Danielle Mizuiri; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.