Literature DB >> 28460408

Does Kinematic Alignment Improve Short-Term Functional Outcomes after Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Mechanical Alignment? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Yanhong Li1, Shuanke Wang1, Yuliang Wang1, Mingxuan Yang1.   

Abstract

This meta-analysis was conducted to study whether kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves short-term functional outcomes compared with mechanical alignment without changing the hip-knee-ankle angle. Prospective cohort studies were searched from electronic literature databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid interface), and Cochrane Library (Ovid interface). Total 1,159 records were identified. Six trials involving 561 patients were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. The included studies recorded outcomes in the follow-up range from 6 to 34 months. Primary outcomes were to assess the functional outcomes in follow-up, and KA group achieved better performance on WOMAC score (mean difference [MD] = -18.82, 95% CI: -16.06 to -5.58), knee function score (MD = 7.23, 95% CI: 0.52-13.94), Oxford knee score (MD = 4.76, 95% CI: 0.40-9.12), and knee range of flexion (MD = 4.48, 95% CI: 2.09-6.86), whereas other parameters including Knee Society score, knee range of extension, VAS pain score, and the occurrence of the complications were without significant difference (p > 0.05). Second outcomes evaluated the perioperative clinic indexes. Our meta-analysis showed that KA group had a shorter time of operation (MD = -15.44, 95% CI: -27.47 to -3.71) and a longer walk distance before discharge (MD = 53.24, 95% CI: 21.32-85.15) when compared with the MA group, whereas the change in hemoglobin, incision length, knee range of flexion before discharge, and length of stays were without significant difference (p > 0.05). Third outcomes were used to analyze the alignment data. Our study showed that KA had larger angles of femoral component and mechanical axis of the femur (MD = -1.95,95% CI: -2.77 to -1.13), tibial component and mechanical axis of tibia (MD = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.43-2.70), anatomic knee angle (MD = -0.72, 95% CI: -1.33 to -0.11), and operative limb alignment (MD = -1.97, 95% CI: -2.50 to -1.45,) compared with the MA group, but the hip-knee-ankle angles between the two groups were similar. KA provided better functional outcomes and better flexion following short-term follow-up of TKA. However, longer-term follow-up and larger sample studies are needed to put into research in the future. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28460408     DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  9 in total

Review 1.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Combining kinematic alignment and medial stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: Basic rationale and preliminary clinical evidences.

Authors:  Salvatore Risitano; Luigi Sabatini; Luca Barberis; Federico Fusini; Michele Malavolta; Pier Francesco Indelli
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-27

3.  Kinematic versus mechanical alignment for primary total knee arthroplasty with minimum 2 years follow-up: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Adrien Pauvert; Cécile Batailler; John Swan; Laurence Cheze; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2020-06-17

4.  Measured Resection Techniques Do Not Align to the Cylindrical Axis in Kinematic Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  David Drynan; Rabi Faisal Rasouli; James W A Williams; Buddhika Balalla
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-03-23

5.  Three-year clinical and radiological results of a cruciate-retaining type of the knee prosthesis with anatomical geometry developed in Japan.

Authors:  Arata Nakajima; Manabu Yamada; Masato Sonobe; Yorikazu Akatsu; Masahiko Saito; Keiichiro Yamamoto; Junya Saito; Masaki Norimoto; Keita Koyama; Hiroshi Takahashi; Yasuchika Aoki; Toru Suguro; Koichi Nakagawa
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Slight femoral under-correction versus neutral alignment in total knee arthroplasty with preoperative varus knees: a comparative study.

Authors:  Kai Lei; Li-Ming Liu; Peng-Fei Yang; Ran Xiong; De-Jie Fu; Liu Yang; Lin Guo
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-01-07

7.  Kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Binfeng Liu; Chengyao Feng; Chao Tu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  Clinical outcomes of kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mark Anthony Roussot; Georges Frederic Vles; Sam Oussedik
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-09-10

Review 9.  Comparison of Kinematic Alignment and Mechanical Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiang Gao; Neng-Ji Long; Shao-Yun Zhang; Wei Yu; Yi-Xin Dai; Cong Xiao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 2.071

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.