Brook T Moyers1,2, Gregory L Owens1, Gregory J Baute1, Loren H Rieseberg1. 1. Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Room 3529-6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. 2. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The patterning of floral ultraviolet (UV) pigmentation varies both intra- and interspecifically in sunflowers and many other plant species, impacts pollinator attraction, and can be critical to reproductive success and crop yields. However, the genetic basis for variation in UV patterning is largely unknown. This study examines the genetic architecture for proportional and absolute size of the UV bullseye in Helianthus argophyllus , a close relative of the domesticated sunflower. Methods: A camera modified to capture UV light (320-380 nm) was used to phenotype floral UV patterning in an F 2 mapping population, then quantitative trait loci (QTL) were identified using genotyping-by-sequencing and linkage mapping. The ability of these QTL to predict the UV patterning of natural population individuals was also assessed. Key Results: Proportional UV pigmentation is additively controlled by six moderate effect QTL that are predictive of this phenotype in natural populations. In contrast, UV bullseye size is controlled by a single large effect QTL that also controls flowerhead size and co-localizes with a major flowering time QTL in Helianthus . Conclusions: The co-localization of the UV bullseye size QTL, flowerhead size QTL and a previously known flowering time QTL may indicate a single highly pleiotropic locus or several closely linked loci, which could inhibit UV bullseye size from responding to selection without change in correlated characters. The genetic architecture of proportional UV pigmentation is relatively simple and different from that of UV bullseye size, and so should be able to respond to natural or artificial selection independently.
Background and Aims: The patterning of floral ultraviolet (UV) pigmentation varies both intra- and interspecifically in sunflowers and many other plant species, impacts pollinator attraction, and can be critical to reproductive success and crop yields. However, the genetic basis for variation in UV patterning is largely unknown. This study examines the genetic architecture for proportional and absolute size of the UV bullseye in Helianthus argophyllus , a close relative of the domesticated sunflower. Methods: A camera modified to capture UV light (320-380 nm) was used to phenotype floral UV patterning in an F 2 mapping population, then quantitative trait loci (QTL) were identified using genotyping-by-sequencing and linkage mapping. The ability of these QTL to predict the UV patterning of natural population individuals was also assessed. Key Results: Proportional UV pigmentation is additively controlled by six moderate effect QTL that are predictive of this phenotype in natural populations. In contrast, UV bullseye size is controlled by a single large effect QTL that also controls flowerhead size and co-localizes with a major flowering time QTL in Helianthus . Conclusions: The co-localization of the UV bullseye size QTL, flowerhead size QTL and a previously known flowering time QTL may indicate a single highly pleiotropic locus or several closely linked loci, which could inhibit UV bullseye size from responding to selection without change in correlated characters. The genetic architecture of proportional UV pigmentation is relatively simple and different from that of UV bullseye size, and so should be able to respond to natural or artificial selection independently.
Authors: Marc A Heim; Marc Jakoby; Martin Werber; Cathie Martin; Bernd Weisshaar; Paul C Bailey Journal: Mol Biol Evol Date: 2003-04-02 Impact factor: 16.240
Authors: Nolan C Kane; John M Burke; Laura Marek; Gerald Seiler; Felicity Vear; Gregory Baute; Steven J Knapp; Patrick Vincourt; Loren H Rieseberg Journal: Mol Ecol Resour Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 7.090
Authors: S Wieckhorst; E Bachlava; C M Dussle; S Tang; W Gao; C Saski; S J Knapp; C-C Schön; V Hahn; E Bauer Journal: Theor Appl Genet Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 5.699
Authors: Marco Todesco; Natalia Bercovich; Amy Kim; Ivana Imerovski; Gregory L Owens; Óscar Dorado Ruiz; Srinidhi V Holalu; Lufiani L Madilao; Mojtaba Jahani; Jean-Sébastien Légaré; Benjamin K Blackman; Loren H Rieseberg Journal: Elife Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Michael B Kantar; Sariel Hüber; Adam Herman; Dan G Bock; Greg Baute; Kevin Betts; Matthew Ott; Yaniv Brandvain; Donald Wyse; Robert M Stupar; Loren H Rieseberg Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 4.096