| Literature DB >> 28459936 |
Ellen T Chang1,2, Zhiwei Liu3, Allan Hildesheim4, Qing Liu5,6, Yonglin Cai7,8, Zhe Zhang9,10, Guomin Chen11, Shang-Hang Xie5,6, Su-Mei Cao5,6, Jian-Yong Shao6, Wei-Hua Jia6, Yuming Zheng7,8, Jian Liao12, Yufeng Chen10, Longde Lin10, Ingemar Ernberg13, Thomas L Vaughan14,15, Hans-Olov Adami3,16, Guangwu Huang9,10, Yi Zeng11, Yi-Xin Zeng6,17, Weimin Ye3.
Abstract
The magnitude and patterns of associations between smoking and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in high-incidence regions remain uncertain. Associations with active and passive tobacco smoking were estimated using multivariate logistic regression in a population-based case-control study of 2,530 NPC cases and 2,595 controls in Guangdong and Guangxi, southern China, in 2010-2014. Among men, risk of NPC was significantly higher in current smokers compared with never smokers (odds ratio (OR) = 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14, 1.53) but not in former smokers (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.73, 1.17). Risk increased with smoking intensity (per 10 cigarettes/day, OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.16), smoking duration (per 10 years, OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.16), and cumulative smoking (per 10 pack-years, OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.12). Risk decreased with later age at smoking initiation (per year, OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96, 0.98) but not greater time since smoking cessation. Exposures to passive smoking during childhood (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.48) and from a spouse during adulthood (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.63) were independently associated with increased NPC risk in never-smoking men and women, but exposure-response trends were not observed. In conclusion, active and passive tobacco smoking are associated with modestly increased risk of NPC in southern China; risk is highest among long-term smokers.Entities:
Keywords: China; case-control studies; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; passive smoking; smoking; tobacco smoking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28459936 PMCID: PMC5860561 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Epidemiol ISSN: 0002-9262 Impact factor: 4.897