Christian M Schulz1, Amanda Burden, Karen L Posner, Shawn L Mincer, Randolph Steadman, Klaus J Wagner, Karen B Domino. 1. From the Department of Anesthesiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany (C.M.S., K.J.W.); Department of Anesthesiology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey (A.B.); Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (K.L.P., S.L.M., K.B.D.); and Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of California Los Angeles Health System, Los Angeles, California (R.S.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Situational awareness errors may play an important role in the genesis of patient harm. The authors examined closed anesthesia malpractice claims for death or brain damage to determine the frequency and type of situational awareness errors. METHODS: Surgical and procedural anesthesia death and brain damage claims in the Anesthesia Closed Claims Project database were analyzed. Situational awareness error was defined as failure to perceive relevant clinical information, failure to comprehend the meaning of available information, or failure to project, anticipate, or plan. Patient and case characteristics, primary damaging events, and anesthesia payments in claims with situational awareness errors were compared to other death and brain damage claims from 2002 to 2013. RESULTS: Anesthesiologist situational awareness errors contributed to death or brain damage in 198 of 266 claims (74%). Respiratory system damaging events were more common in claims with situational awareness errors (56%) than other claims (21%, P < 0.001). The most common specific respiratory events in error claims were inadequate oxygenation or ventilation (24%), difficult intubation (11%), and aspiration (10%). Payments were made in 85% of situational awareness error claims compared to 46% in other claims (P = 0.001), with no significant difference in payment size. Among 198 claims with anesthesia situational awareness error, perception errors were most common (42%), whereas comprehension errors (29%) and projection errors (29%) were relatively less common. CONCLUSIONS: Situational awareness error definitions were operationalized for reliable application to real-world anesthesia cases. Situational awareness errors may have contributed to catastrophic outcomes in three quarters of recent anesthesia malpractice claims.Situational awareness errors resulting in death or brain damage remain prevalent causes of malpractice claims in the 21st century.
BACKGROUND: Situational awareness errors may play an important role in the genesis of patient harm. The authors examined closed anesthesia malpractice claims for death or brain damage to determine the frequency and type of situational awareness errors. METHODS: Surgical and procedural anesthesia death and brain damage claims in the Anesthesia Closed Claims Project database were analyzed. Situational awareness error was defined as failure to perceive relevant clinical information, failure to comprehend the meaning of available information, or failure to project, anticipate, or plan. Patient and case characteristics, primary damaging events, and anesthesia payments in claims with situational awareness errors were compared to other death and brain damage claims from 2002 to 2013. RESULTS: Anesthesiologist situational awareness errors contributed to death or brain damage in 198 of 266 claims (74%). Respiratory system damaging events were more common in claims with situational awareness errors (56%) than other claims (21%, P < 0.001). The most common specific respiratory events in error claims were inadequate oxygenation or ventilation (24%), difficult intubation (11%), and aspiration (10%). Payments were made in 85% of situational awareness error claims compared to 46% in other claims (P = 0.001), with no significant difference in payment size. Among 198 claims with anesthesia situational awareness error, perception errors were most common (42%), whereas comprehension errors (29%) and projection errors (29%) were relatively less common. CONCLUSIONS: Situational awareness error definitions were operationalized for reliable application to real-world anesthesia cases. Situational awareness errors may have contributed to catastrophic outcomes in three quarters of recent anesthesia malpractice claims.Situational awareness errors resulting in death or brain damage remain prevalent causes of malpractice claims in the 21st century.
Authors: Lawrence W Way; Lygia Stewart; Walter Gantert; Kingsway Liu; Crystine M Lee; Karen Whang; John G Hunter Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Mary Cathryn Sitterding; Patricia Ebright; Marion Broome; Emily S Patterson; Staci Wuchner Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Gene N Peterson; Karen B Domino; Robert A Caplan; Karen L Posner; Lorri A Lee; Frederick W Cheney Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: David W Tscholl; Mona Weiss; Lucas Handschin; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Nöthiger Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Juliane Pfarr; David W Tscholl; Michael T Ganter; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Noethiger Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Doreen J Wetli; Lisa Bergauer; Christoph B Nöthiger; Tadzio R Roche; Donat R Spahn; David W Tscholl; Sadiq Said Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-02-21
Authors: Olivier Garot; Julian Rössler; Juliane Pfarr; Michael T Ganter; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Nöthiger; David W Tscholl Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: David Werner Tscholl; Julian Rössler; Sadiq Said; Alexander Kaserer; Donat Rudolf Spahn; Christoph Beat Nöthiger Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Sadiq Said; Malgorzata Gozdzik; Tadzio Raoul Roche; Julia Braun; Julian Rössler; Alexander Kaserer; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Nöthiger; David Werner Tscholl Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-09-07 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; George Kovacs Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 5.063