Literature DB >> 28459185

Karyomapping and how is it improving preimplantation genetics?

Rebecca L Gould1,2, Darren K Griffin2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening (PGD/PGS) has been applied clinically for >25 years however inherent drawbacks include the necessity to tailor each case to the trait in question, and that technology to detect monogenic and chromosomal disorders respectively is fundamentally different. Areas covered: The area of preimplantation genetics has evolved over the last 25 years, adapting to changes in technology and the need for more efficient, streamlined diagnoses. Karyomapping allows the determination of inheritance from the (grand)parental haplobocks through assembly of inherited chromosomal segments. The output displays homologous chromosomes, crossovers and the genetic status of the embryos by linkage comparison, as well as chromosomal disorders. It also allows for determination of heterozygous SNP calls, avoiding the risks of allele dropout, a common problem with other PGD techniques. Manuscripts documenting the evolution of preimplantation genetics, especially those investigating technologies that would simultaneously detect monogenic and chromosomal disorders, were selected for review. Expert commentary: Karyomapping is currently available for detection of single gene disorders; ~1000 clinics worldwide offer it (via ~20 diagnostic laboratories) and ~2500 cases have been performed. Due an inability to detect post-zygotic trisomy reliably however and confounding problems of embryo mosaicism, karyomapping has yet to be applied clinically for detection of chromosome disorders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; PGD; PGS; PGT; karyomapping

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28459185     DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1325736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1473-7159            Impact factor:   5.225


  6 in total

1.  Off the street phasing (OTSP): no hassle haplotype phasing for molecular PGD applications.

Authors:  David A Zeevi; Fouad Zahdeh; Yehuda Kling; Shai Carmi; Gheona Altarescu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Conditions: Is Cell-Free DNA Testing the Next Step?

Authors:  Deirdre Zander-Fox; Tristan Hardy; Alice Rogers; Melody Menezes; Stefan C Kane
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Karyomapping in preimplantation genetic testing for β-thalassemia combined with HLA matching: a systematic summary.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Bao-Min Lu; Rong Li; Jing Guo; Yan Xu; Jia-Fu Pan; Yan-Hong Zeng; Can-Quan Zhou; Yan-Wen Xu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Expanded carrier screening in Chinese patients seeking the help of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Yanping Xi; Guangquan Chen; Caixia Lei; Junping Wu; Shuo Zhang; Min Xiao; Wenbi Zhang; Yueping Zhang; Xiaoxi Sun
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.183

5.  Importance of embryo aneuploidy screening in preimplantation genetic diagnosis for monogenic diseases using the karyomap gene chip.

Authors:  Gang Li; Wenbin Niu; Haixia Jin; Jiawei Xu; Wenyan Song; Yihong Guo; Yingchun Su; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Clinical utility of combined preimplantation genetic testing methods in couples at risk of passing on beta thalassemia/hemoglobin E disease: A retrospective review from a single center.

Authors:  Chonthicha Satirapod; Matchuporn Sukprasert; Bhakbhoom Panthan; Angkana Charoenyingwattana; Pawares Chitayanan; Wasun Chantratita; Wicharn Choktanasiri; Objoon Trachoo; Suradej Hongeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.