| Literature DB >> 28459051 |
Laura Moles1, Marta Gómez1, Esther Jiménez1,2, Gerardo Bustos3,4, Javier de Andrés1, Ana Melgar3,4, Diana Escuder3,4, Leónides Fernández1,2, Rosa Del Campo5,6,7,8, Juan Miguel Rodríguez1,2.
Abstract
Studies focused on the stomach microbiota are relatively scarce, and most of them are focused on the adult population. The aim of this work is to describe the bacterial communities inhabiting the gastric content (GC) of preterm neonates. For that purpose, GC samples were collected weekly from a total of 13 preterm neonates during their first month of life within their hospital stay. Samples were analyzed by using both culture-dependent and -independent techniques. The former allowed the isolation of bacteria belonging mainly to the genera Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Serratia, Klebsiella, and Escherichia. The cultured dominant species in the GC samples during all the hospitalization period were Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis revealed the presence of high-risk clonal complexes associated with the hospital environment, which may colonize enteral feeding tubes. Similarly, the 16S rRNA sequencing showed that Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Corynebacterium, and Propionibacterium were the dominant genera present at 75% of the gastric samples. However, the genera Serratia, Klebsiella, and Streptococcus were the most abundant. Own mother's milk (OMM) and donor milk (DM) were collected after their pass through the external feeding tubes to assess their bacterial content. OMM and DM had a similar bacterial pattern to GC. Based on these data, the GC of preterm neonates is dominated by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes and harbors high-risk bacterial clones, which may colonize enteral feeding tubes, and therefore the feeds that pass through them.Entities:
Keywords: gastric content; microbiome; microbiota; preterm infants; stomach
Year: 2017 PMID: 28459051 PMCID: PMC5394887 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2017.00012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Demographic characteristics of the infants included in the study.
| Infant | Gestational age (weeks) | Gender | Birth weight (g) | Delivery mode | Sample collection (days of life) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culture | 16S rRNA | |||||
| 1 | 30 | M | 1,550 | Cesarean section | 0, 14, 21 | 0, 14 |
| 2 | 27 | F | 1,080 | Cesarean section | 0, 7, 14, 21, 28 | 0, 21 |
| 3 | 30 | M | 2,030 | Cesarean section | 0, 7, 14, 21 | 14 |
| 4 | 30 | M | 1,760 | Vaginal | 0, 7, 14, 21 | 14 |
| 5 | 32 | F | 1,310 | Vaginal | 0, 14, 21 | 14 |
| 6 | 26 | F | 920 | Vaginal | 7, 14, 21 | 21 |
| 7 | 29 | F | 1,040 | Cesarean section | 7, 21, 28 | 21 |
| 8 | 24 | M | 740 | Vaginal | 7, 14, 21 | 21 |
| 9 | 25 | M | 720 | Vaginal | 14, 21 | 21 |
| 10 | 28 | M | 1,100 | Cesarean section | 14, 21 | 21 |
| 11 | 31 | F | 1,430 | Vaginal | 0, 7, 14, 21 | 21 |
| 12 | 27 | M | 950 | Cesarean section | 7, 14, 21 | 28 |
| 13 | 24 | M | 870 | Cesarean section | 21 | 21 |
| Mean (95% CI) | 27.9 (26.3–29.5) | 1,192 (950–1,435) | ||||
Clinical characteristics of the infants included in the study.
| Infant | Antibiotherapy (days) | Parenteral nutrition (days) | Enteral feeding tube (days) | Mechanical ventilation (days) | Hospital stay (days) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 5 | 38 | 0 | 42 | – |
| 2 | 9 | 3 | 48 | 0.5 | 60 | – |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 2 | 27 | – |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 27 | – |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 28 | – |
| 6 | 33 | 8 | 97 | 26 | 102 | 2 |
| 7 | 7 | 5 | 45 | 0 | 47 | – |
| 8 | 27 | 13 | 112 | 35 | 116 | 1 |
| 9 | 38 | 10 | 144 | 140 | 144 | 1 |
| 10 | 7 | 14 | 62 | 10 | 73 | – |
| 11 | 3 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 37 | – |
| 12 | 3 | 8 | 62 | 0.04 | 70 | – |
| 13 | 29 | 12 | 90 | 37 | 102 | – |
| Mean (95% CI) | 12.7 (4.4–20.9) | 6.3 (3.3–9.3) | 62.0 (39.1–84.9) | 0.5 (0–26) | 67.3 (44.2–90.4) |
.
Microbial genera isolated from gastric content of preterm neonates.
| Genus | Day 0 ( | Day 7 ( | Day 14 ( | Day 21 ( | Day 28 ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial counts, median (IQR) | Bacterial counts, median (IQR) | Bacterial counts, median (IQR) | Bacterial counts, median (IQR) | Bacterial counts, median (IQR) | |||||||
| 1 (17) | 5.18 | 6 (75) | 5.29 (1.27–5.99) | 7 (64) | 5.81 (3.35–6.23) | 5 (45) | 4.02 (2.30–5.85) | 1 (50) | 5.85 | 0.245 | |
| 0 (0) | – | 2 (25) | 4.66 (3.23–6.09) | 5 (45) | 4.19 (3.40–4.74) | 8 (73) | 6.25 (4.26–6.63) | 2 (100) | 3.58 (3.45–3.71) | 0.027 | |
| 0 (0) | – | 0 (0) | – | 0 (0) | – | 1 (9) | 5.78 | 0 (0) | – | 0.653 | |
| 1 (17) | 2.70 | 1 (13) | 2.65 | 0 (0) | – | 4 (36) | 4.47 (3.43–5.02) | 1 (50) | 8.85 | 0.139 | |
| 0 (0) | – | 0 (0) | – | 1 (9) | 2.00 | 0 (0) | – | 0 (0) | – | 0.653 | |
| 1 (17) | 5.88 | 1 (13) | 1.70 | 2 (18) | 6.30 (6.17–6.42) | 0 (0) | – | 1 (50) | 8.18 | 0.292 | |
| 1 (17) | 2.70 | 2 (25) | 6.05 (4.70–7.40) | 1 (9) | 6.88 | 2 (18) | 6.14 (5.66–6.62) | 1 (50) | 9.06 | 0.575 | |
| 0 (0) | – | 0 (0) | – | 2 (18) | 3.33 (3.01–3.64) | 1 (9) | 5.22 | 1 (50) | 2.78 | 0.269 | |
*Friedman test.
Figure 1Bacterial species isolated from the gastric content samples analyzed in this study. ST clones of Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae detected by MLST genotyping in each infant and at each sampling time are shown below the graph.
Figure 2Shannon diversity index of gastric content samples analyzed with 16S rRNA.
Figure 3Relative abundances of operational taxonomic units at phylum level accounting for >1% of the total bacterial community are shown for each sample.
Figure 4Relative abundances of operational taxonomic units at genus level accounting for >1% of the total bacterial community are shown for gastric content (GC), own mother’s milk (OMM), and donor milk (DM) samples.
Relative abundance of bacterial genera represented ≥0.5% of the communities detected in gastric content (GC) and human milk samples.
| Phylum | Genus | GC, median ( | Own mother’s milk (OMM), median ( | Donor milk (DM), median ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.58 | 2.16 | 0.36 | 0.197 | 0.735 | ||
| 0.46 | 1.62 | 0.20 | 0.558 | 0.127 | ||
| 11.21 | 0.98 | 0.28 | 0.602 | 0.311 | ||
| 0.54 | 2.16 | 0.32 | 0.439 | 0.414 | ||
| 0.28 | 5.87 | 0.13 | – | 0.221 | ||
| – | 0.22 | 0.84 | – | – | ||
| 0.92 | 3.63 | 1.38 | 0.514 | 0.484 | ||
| 1.04 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.131 | 0.341 | ||
| 3.32 | – | 0.09 | 0.485 | |||
| 4.16 | 0.33 | 1.26 | 0.115 | 0.312 | ||
| 4.24 | 5.79 | 20.14 | 0.515 | 0.170 | ||
| 1.97 | 0.34 | 0.67 | 0.305 | 0.380 | ||
| 2.41 | 17.12 | 7.11 | 0.833 | 0.112 | ||
| 9.07 | 0.10 | 5.10 | 0.122 | 0.062 | ||
| 0.42 | 1.43 | 0.65 | 0.655 | – | ||
| 0.41 | 1.96 | 0.11 | 1.000 | – | ||
| 0.06 | 0.40 | 1.12 | 0.604 | 0.180 | ||
| 0.14 | 1.39 | 0.98 | 0.296 | 0.117 | ||
| 0.89 | 0.12 | 13.59 | 0.683 | 0.307 | ||
| 0.71 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.229 | 0.157 | ||
| 0.36 | 3.14 | 4.14 | 0.089 | 0.079 | ||
| 9.59 | 1.84 | 0.79 | 0.380 | – | ||
| 1.39 | 0.05 | 0.22 | 0.134 | 0.739 | ||
| 15.68 | 56.86 | 15.68 | 0.133 | – | ||
| 0.57 | 1.34 | 0.79 | 0.655 | 0.770 | ||
| 0.78 | 1.29 | 1.44 | 0.086 | – |
P value 1: Kruskal–Wallis was used to compare GC and OMM.
P value 2: Kruskal–Wallis was used to compare GC and DM.
*Mean of the relative abundance.
**ANOVA test.