| Literature DB >> 29921329 |
Lee Call1, Barbara Stoll1, Berthe Oosterloo1, Nadim Ajami2, Fariha Sheikh3, Anja Wittke4, Rosaline Waworuntu4, Brian Berg4, Joseph Petrosino2, Oluyinka Olutoye3, Douglas Burrin5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Major risk factors for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) include premature birth and formula feeding in the context of microbial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract. We previously showed that feeding formula composed of lactose vs. corn syrup solids protects against NEC in preterm pigs; however, the microbial and metabolic effects of these different carbohydrates used in infant formula has not been explored.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridium; Corn syrup solids; Infant formula; Lactate; Lactose; Maltodextrin; Necrotizing enterocolitis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29921329 PMCID: PMC6009052 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0498-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Ingredient and macronutrient composition of formulas containing lactose (LAC), corn syrup solids (CSS), or mixture (MIX)
| LAC | MIX | CSS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lactose | 60.0 | 30.0 | – |
| Corn syrup solids | – | 30.0 | 60.0 |
| MCT oil | 24.7 | 24.7 | 24.7 |
| Soybean oil | 18.2 | 18.2 | 18.2 |
| High oleic (sunflower) oil | 16.1 | 16.1 | 16.1 |
| Casein protein hydrolysate | 28.7 | 28.7 | 28.7 |
| Whey protein isolate | 37.3 | 37.3 | 37.3 |
| Protein | 66.0 | 66.0 | 66.0 |
| Fat | 59.0 | 59.0 | 59.0 |
| Carbohydrate | 60.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 |
Components are listed as g/L. All additional macrominerals, trace minerals, and vitamins are formulated to meet or exceed the requirements of neonatal piglets
Fig. 1Phenotypic outcomes of the study. a NEC incidence within each of the three formula groups; Fisher’s exact test. b Kaplan-Meir analysis comparing survival time before euthanizing for NEC across the three formula groups; log-rank test. c Gross and histological NEC severity scores across GI regions for the three formula groups. For the gross severity, each of the GI regions is assessed at the time of dissection and assigned a score of 1–2 (healthy tissue), 3–4 (moderate inflammation), or 5–6 (pneumatosis and necrosis). For histological severity, H & E-stained tissue sections are scored as 0 (no damage), or from a range of 1 to 4 based on extent of necrosis, villus blunting, and pneumatosis. Values are mean +/− standard error of the mean; linear model with birthweight and farm as covariates and Tukey’s post hoc comparisons
Body weights and gut morphometry of piglets fed formulas containing lactose (LAC), corn syrup solids (CSS), or mixture (MIX)
| LAC | MIX | CSS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number pigs/group | |||
| Healthy | 18 | 6 | 25 |
| NEC | 3 | 6 | 20 |
| Time of death, hr post-feeding | |||
| Healthy | 106 ± 7 | 121 ± 1 | 104 ± 6 |
| NEC | 83 ± 23 | 75 ± 12† | 62 ± 9† |
| Birth weight (g) | |||
| Healthy | 934 ± 45 | 1011 ± 62 | 1066 ± 45 |
| NEC | 872 ± 28 | 1010 ± 108 | 926 ± 50† |
| Final weight (g) | |||
| Healthy | 1382 ± 81 | 1511 ± 86 | 1530 ± 79 |
| NEC | 1203 ± 116 | 1310 ± 122 | 1203 ± 97 |
| Weight gain (g•kg− 1•day− 1) | |||
| Healthy | 104 ± 6 | 99 ± 6 | 94 ± 6 |
| NEC | 106 ± 17 | 86 ± 30 | 61 ± 20 |
| Proximal jejunum | |||
| Villus height | |||
| Healthy | 467 ± 34 | 427 ± 39 | 569 ± 33 |
| NEC | 314 ± 25† | 305 ± 32† | 330 ± 38† |
| Crypt depth (μm) | |||
| Healthy | 94 ± 3 | 107 ± 8 | 102 ± 5 |
| NEC | 75 ± 8 | 79 ± 9† | 83 ± 4† |
| Terminal ileum | |||
| Villus height | |||
| Healthy | 537 ± 21 | 518 ± 12 | 634 ± 45 |
| NEC | 179 ± 52† | 277 ± 55† | 291 ± 46† |
| Crypt depth (μm) | |||
| Healthy | 114 ± 6 | 131 ± 12 | 121 ± 6 |
| NEC | 97 ± 3† | 75 ± 9† | 82 ± 6† |
| Colon | |||
| Crypt depth (μm) | |||
| Healthy | 232 ± 14 | 183 ± 16 | 216 ± 9 |
| NEC | 314 ± 2a† | 148 ± 5b | 213 ± 14c |
Values are mean ± standard error of the mean. Superscripts a, b, and c designate the results of Tukey’s post hoc test comparing across groups; groups sharing letters are not significantly different (no superscripts if no differences were detected for that row). The cross, †, identifies differences between Healthy and NEC within a group, by student’s t test. An alpha level of 0.05 was used for all tests
Fig. 2Microbiota richness in gastrointestinal contents. Counts of observed OTUs for luminal content samples from all pigs comparing the groups at each GI region in pigs by formula carbohydrate (a) or disease phenotype (b) Holm-Bonferroni adjusted Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests
Fig. 3Relative abundance of the top 7 most abundant genera in gastrointestinal contents, comparing across the different formula groups. Box-and-whisker plots for genus-level comparisons of bacteria detected in piglets’ stomach, ileum, and colon luminal contents. Groups include all piglets which were fed one of the three different formulas; Holm-Bonferroni adjusted Kruskal-Wallis tests
Fig. 4Relative abundance of the top 7 most abundant genera in gastrointestinal contents, comparing Healthy to NEC. Box-and-whisker plots for genus-level comparisons between piglets which developed NEC and those which did not develop NEC during the course of the experiment, using samples of stomach, ileum, and colon luminal contents from all piglets which were fed one of the three different formulas; Holm-Bonferroni adjusted Mann-Whitney U tests
Fig. 5Heatmap of cecal contents metabolite profiles clustered by formula carbohydrate and disease phenotype. Shows the relative concentration of the top 50 metabolites with the largest differences between healthy and NEC piglets. All metabolites included are significantly different (FDR-adjusted q < 0.05) between healthy and NEC by two-way ANOVA (formula group × disease phenotype)
Fig. 6Selected plasma and cecal metabolites with differences by disease phenotype (a) or formula carbohydrate (b). Representative metabolites from the major pathways found to be differentially abundant in plasma and cecal content samples. Metabolite concentrations are shown on a mean-centered and standard deviation-scaled y-axis. Each metabolite shown was found to be significantly different (FDR-adjusted q < 0.01) either between healthy and NEC piglets or across formula groups by two-way ANOVA (formula group × disease phenotype)