Literature DB >> 28458222

River ecosystem processes: A synthesis of approaches, criteria of use and sensitivity to environmental stressors.

Daniel von Schiller1, Vicenç Acuña2, Ibon Aristi3, Maite Arroita3, Ana Basaguren3, Alberto Bellin4, Luz Boyero5, Andrea Butturini6, Antoni Ginebreda7, Eleni Kalogianni8, Aitor Larrañaga3, Bruno Majone4, Aingeru Martínez3, Silvia Monroy3, Isabel Muñoz6, Momir Paunović9, Olatz Pereda3, Mira Petrovic10, Jesús Pozo3, Sara Rodríguez-Mozaz2, Daniel Rivas7, Sergi Sabater11, Francesc Sabater6, Nikolaos Skoulikidis8, Libe Solagaistua3, Leonidas Vardakas8, Arturo Elosegi3.   

Abstract

River ecosystems are subject to multiple stressors that affect their structure and functioning. Ecosystem structure refers to characteristics such as channel form, water quality or the composition of biological communities, whereas ecosystem functioning refers to processes such as metabolism, organic matter decomposition or secondary production. Structure and functioning respond in contrasting and complementary ways to environmental stressors. Moreover, assessing the response of ecosystem functioning to stressors is critical to understand the effects on the ecosystem services that produce direct benefits to humans. Yet, there is more information on structural than on functional parameters, and despite the many approaches available to measure river ecosystem processes, structural approaches are more widely used, especially in management. One reason for this discrepancy is the lack of synthetic studies analyzing river ecosystem functioning in a way that is useful for both scientists and managers. Here, we present a synthesis of key river ecosystem processes, which provides a description of the main characteristics of each process, including criteria guiding their measurement as well as their respective sensitivity to stressors. We also discuss the current limitations, potential improvements and future steps that the use of functional measures in rivers needs to face.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic; Ecosystem health; Function; Functioning; Methods; Running water

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28458222     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

Review 1.  Salinity impacts on river ecosystem processes: a critical mini-review.

Authors:  Elisabeth Berger; Oliver Frör; Ralf B Schäfer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Reconceptualizing the hyporheic zone for nonperennial rivers and streams.

Authors:  Amanda G DelVecchia; Margaret Shanafield; Margaret A Zimmer; Michelle H Busch; Corey A Krabbenhoft; Rachel Stubbington; Kendra E Kaiser; Ryan M Burrows; Jake Hosen; Thibault Datry; Stephanie K Kampf; Samuel C Zipper; Ken Fritz; Katie Costigan; Daniel C Allen
Journal:  Freshw Sci       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.353

3.  Effects of multiple stressors associated with agriculture on stream macroinvertebrate communities in a tropical catchment.

Authors:  Aydeé Cornejo; Alan M Tonin; Brenda Checa; Ana Raquel Tuñon; Diana Pérez; Enilda Coronado; Stefani González; Tomás Ríos; Pablo Macchi; Francisco Correa-Araneda; Luz Boyero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Experimental Investigation on the Relationship Between COD Degradation and Hydrodynamic Conditions in Urban Rivers.

Authors:  Lei Tang; Xiangdong Pan; Jingjie Feng; Xunchi Pu; Ruifeng Liang; Ran Li; Kefeng Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Drought and nutrient pollution produce multiple interactive effects in stream ecosystems.

Authors:  Robert J Fournier; Daniel D Magoulick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Climate mediates continental scale patterns of stream microbial functional diversity.

Authors:  Félix Picazo; Annika Vilmi; Juha Aalto; Janne Soininen; Emilio O Casamayor; Yongqin Liu; Qinglong Wu; Lijuan Ren; Jizhong Zhou; Ji Shen; Jianjun Wang
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 7.  Functional measures as potential indicators of down-the-drain chemical stress in freshwater ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Laura J Harrison; Katie A Pearson; Christopher J Wheatley; Jane K Hill; Lorraine Maltby; Claudia Rivetti; Lucy Speirs; Piran C L White
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.084

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.