| Literature DB >> 28458222 |
Daniel von Schiller1, Vicenç Acuña2, Ibon Aristi3, Maite Arroita3, Ana Basaguren3, Alberto Bellin4, Luz Boyero5, Andrea Butturini6, Antoni Ginebreda7, Eleni Kalogianni8, Aitor Larrañaga3, Bruno Majone4, Aingeru Martínez3, Silvia Monroy3, Isabel Muñoz6, Momir Paunović9, Olatz Pereda3, Mira Petrovic10, Jesús Pozo3, Sara Rodríguez-Mozaz2, Daniel Rivas7, Sergi Sabater11, Francesc Sabater6, Nikolaos Skoulikidis8, Libe Solagaistua3, Leonidas Vardakas8, Arturo Elosegi3.
Abstract
River ecosystems are subject to multiple stressors that affect their structure and functioning. Ecosystem structure refers to characteristics such as channel form, water quality or the composition of biological communities, whereas ecosystem functioning refers to processes such as metabolism, organic matter decomposition or secondary production. Structure and functioning respond in contrasting and complementary ways to environmental stressors. Moreover, assessing the response of ecosystem functioning to stressors is critical to understand the effects on the ecosystem services that produce direct benefits to humans. Yet, there is more information on structural than on functional parameters, and despite the many approaches available to measure river ecosystem processes, structural approaches are more widely used, especially in management. One reason for this discrepancy is the lack of synthetic studies analyzing river ecosystem functioning in a way that is useful for both scientists and managers. Here, we present a synthesis of key river ecosystem processes, which provides a description of the main characteristics of each process, including criteria guiding their measurement as well as their respective sensitivity to stressors. We also discuss the current limitations, potential improvements and future steps that the use of functional measures in rivers needs to face.Entities:
Keywords: Aquatic; Ecosystem health; Function; Functioning; Methods; Running water
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28458222 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963