Nicole Karam1, Eloi Marijon2, Florence Dumas3, Lucile Offredo4, Frankie Beganton4, Wulfran Bougouin5, Daniel Jost6, Lionel Lamhaut7, Jean-Philippe Empana8, Alain Cariou9, Christian Spaulding2, Xavier Jouven2. 1. Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Cardiology department, Paris, France; Sudden Death Expertise Center, Paris, France. Electronic address: nicole.karam@aphp.fr. 2. Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Cardiology department, Paris, France; Sudden Death Expertise Center, Paris, France. 3. Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Sudden Death Expertise Center, Paris, France; Département des Urgences, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France. 4. Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France; Sudden Death Expertise Center, Paris, France. 5. Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Sudden Death Expertise Center, Paris, France. 6. Sudden Death Expertise Center, Paris, France; Service Médical d'Urgence-Brigade de Sapeurs-Pompiers de, Paris, France. 7. Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France; Sudden Death Expertise Center, Paris, France; Service d'Aide Médicale Urgente de Paris, Paris, France. 8. Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Sudden Death Expertise Center, Paris, France. 9. Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; Sudden Death Expertise Center, Paris, France; Département de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The impact of time of occurrence has been extensively evaluated for in-hospital cardiac arrests but less for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA). We assessed the impact of the time of occurrence on the characteristics and prognosis of OHCA. METHODS: Using data from the Paris Sudden Cardiac Death Expertise Center prospective study that includes all OHCA in the Paris Area, we compared characteristics and outcomes of off-hours OHCA (nights and days off) to regular-hours OHCA between 2011 and 2014. RESULTS: Among a total of 9834 OHCA (70.0±17years old, 62.1% males), off-hours OHCA accounted for 63.4%. Although bystanders were more often present (74.4 vs. 72.1%, P=0.01), rates of bystander CPR (46.7 vs. 50.6%, P=0.001) and AED use (1.0 vs. 1.9%, P=0.01) were lower during off-hours. While EMS arrival delays were similar, patients were less often in shockable rhythm (16.3 vs. 19.1%, P<0.0001), and return of spontaneous circulation was less frequent (27.5 vs. 31.1%, P<0.0001). There was no difference in rates of targeted temperature control (54.8 vs. 54.7%, P=0.75), coronary angiography (57.3 vs. 58.2%, P=0.68) and angioplasty use (32.2 vs. 35.6%, P=0.22). Survival at hospital discharge was lower (4.7 vs. 6.5%, P<0.0001) during off-hours. After adjusting for potential confounders, time of occurrence was not associated with worse outcome (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.69-1.06, P=0.15), and bystander-initiated CPR, shockable initial rhythm and AED use were the main survival predictors (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Off-hours OHCA have a 30% lower survival rate, mainly due to differences in initial management (bystander CPR and AED use), illustrating the need to improve bystanders' responsiveness in all circumstances.
PURPOSE: The impact of time of occurrence has been extensively evaluated for in-hospital cardiac arrests but less for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA). We assessed the impact of the time of occurrence on the characteristics and prognosis of OHCA. METHODS: Using data from the Paris Sudden Cardiac Death Expertise Center prospective study that includes all OHCA in the Paris Area, we compared characteristics and outcomes of off-hours OHCA (nights and days off) to regular-hours OHCA between 2011 and 2014. RESULTS: Among a total of 9834 OHCA (70.0±17years old, 62.1% males), off-hours OHCA accounted for 63.4%. Although bystanders were more often present (74.4 vs. 72.1%, P=0.01), rates of bystander CPR (46.7 vs. 50.6%, P=0.001) and AED use (1.0 vs. 1.9%, P=0.01) were lower during off-hours. While EMS arrival delays were similar, patients were less often in shockable rhythm (16.3 vs. 19.1%, P<0.0001), and return of spontaneous circulation was less frequent (27.5 vs. 31.1%, P<0.0001). There was no difference in rates of targeted temperature control (54.8 vs. 54.7%, P=0.75), coronary angiography (57.3 vs. 58.2%, P=0.68) and angioplasty use (32.2 vs. 35.6%, P=0.22). Survival at hospital discharge was lower (4.7 vs. 6.5%, P<0.0001) during off-hours. After adjusting for potential confounders, time of occurrence was not associated with worse outcome (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.69-1.06, P=0.15), and bystander-initiated CPR, shockable initial rhythm and AED use were the main survival predictors (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Off-hours OHCA have a 30% lower survival rate, mainly due to differences in initial management (bystander CPR and AED use), illustrating the need to improve bystanders' responsiveness in all circumstances.
Authors: Guido Michels; Tobias Wengenmayer; Christian Hagl; Christian Dohmen; Bernd W Böttiger; Johann Bauersachs; Andreas Markewitz; Adrian Bauer; Jan-Thorsten Gräsner; Roman Pfister; Alexander Ghanem; Hans-Jörg Busch; Uwe Kreimeier; Andreas Beckmann; Matthias Fischer; Clemens Kill; Uwe Janssens; Stefan Kluge; Frank Born; Hans Martin Hoffmeister; Michael Preusch; Udo Boeken; Reimer Riessen; Holger Thiele Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: G Michels; T Wengenmayer; C Hagl; C Dohmen; B W Böttiger; J Bauersachs; A Markewitz; A Bauer; J-T Gräsner; R Pfister; A Ghanem; H-J Busch; U Kreimeier; A Beckmann; M Fischer; C Kill; U Janssens; S Kluge; F Born; H M Hoffmeister; M Preusch; U Boeken; R Riessen; H Thiele Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 0.840
Authors: G Michels; T Wengenmayer; C Hagl; C Dohmen; B W Böttiger; J Bauersachs; A Markewitz; A Bauer; J-T Gräsner; R Pfister; A Ghanem; H-J Busch; U Kreimeier; A Beckmann; M Fischer; C Kill; U Janssens; S Kluge; F Born; H M Hoffmeister; M Preusch; U Boeken; R Riessen; H Thiele Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: C Adler; C Paul; J Hinkelbein; G Michels; R Pfister; A Krings; A Lechleuthner; R Stangl Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Theresa M Olasveengen; Mary E Mancini; Gavin D Perkins; Suzanne Avis; Steven Brooks; Maaret Castrén; Sung Phil Chung; Julie Considine; Keith Couper; Raffo Escalante; Tetsuo Hatanaka; Kevin K C Hung; Peter Kudenchuk; Swee Han Lim; Chika Nishiyama; Giuseppe Ristagno; Federico Semeraro; Christopher M Smith; Michael A Smyth; Christian Vaillancourt; Jerry P Nolan; Mary Fran Hazinski; Peter T Morley Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.262