| Literature DB >> 30361819 |
Guido Michels1,2, Tobias Wengenmayer3,4, Christian Hagl5,6, Christian Dohmen7,8,9, Bernd W Böttiger10,9,11,12, Johann Bauersachs13,14, Andreas Markewitz15,6,9, Adrian Bauer16,17, Jan-Thorsten Gräsner18,11,12, Roman Pfister19, Alexander Ghanem20, Hans-Jörg Busch21,4,9,12, Uwe Kreimeier22,9,12, Andreas Beckmann23,6, Matthias Fischer24,11, Clemens Kill25,11, Uwe Janssens26,4,9, Stefan Kluge27,4,9, Frank Born5,17, Hans Martin Hoffmeister28,14, Michael Preusch29, Udo Boeken30, Reimer Riessen31,4, Holger Thiele32,14.
Abstract
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible aetiology. Currently, there are no randomised, controlled studies on eCPR. Thus, prospective validated predictors of benefit and outcome are lacking. Currently, selection criteria and procedure techniques differ across hospitals and standardised algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a first standardised treatment algorithm for eCPR.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac arrest; Cardiogenic shock; Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Resuscitation
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30361819 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-018-1366-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Res Cardiol ISSN: 1861-0684 Impact factor: 5.460