Literature DB >> 28457950

Practical determination of aortic valve calcium volume score on contrast-enhanced computed tomography prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement and impact on paravalvular regurgitation: Elucidating optimal threshold cutoffs.

Nicolas Bettinger1, Omar K Khalique2, Joseph M Krepp3, Nadira B Hamid3, David J Bae3, Todd C Pulerwitz3, Ming Liao3, Rebecca T Hahn3, Torsten P Vahl3, Tamim M Nazif3, Isaac George3, Martin B Leon3, Andrew J Einstein3, Susheel K Kodali3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The threshold for the optimal computed tomography (CT) number in Hounsfield Units (HU) to quantify aortic valvular calcium on contrast-enhanced scans has not been standardized. Our aim was to find the most accurate threshold to predict paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
METHODS: 104 patients who underwent TAVR with the CoreValve prosthesis were studied retrospectively. Luminal attenuation (LA) in HU was measured at the level of the aortic annulus. Calcium volume score for the aortic valvular complex was measured using 6 threshold cutoffs (650 HU, 850 HU, LA × 1.25, LA × 1.5, LA+50, LA+100). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the predictive value for > mild PVR (n = 16). Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the accuracy to predict > mild PVR after adjustment for depth and perimeter oversizing.
RESULTS: ROC analysis showed lower area under the curve (AUC) values for fixed threshold cutoffs (650 or 850 HU) compared to thresholds relative to LA. The LA+100 threshold had the highest AUC (0.81), and AUC was higher than all studied protocols, other than the LA x 1.25 and LA + 50 protocols, where the difference approached statistical significance (p = 0.05, and 0.068, respectively). Multivariable analysis showed calcium volume determined by the LAx1.25, LAx1.5, LA+50, and LA+ 100 HU protocols to independently predict PVR.
CONCLUSIONS: Calcium volume scoring thresholds which are relative to LA are more predictive of PVR post-TAVR than those which use fixed cutoffs. A threshold of LA+100 HU had the highest predictive value.
Copyright © 2017 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calcium quantification; Calcium scoring; Paravalvular regurgitation; Self-expanding transcatheter valve; TAVR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28457950     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  8 in total

1.  Association of Time Between Left Ventricular and Aortic Systolic Pressure Peaks With Severity of Aortic Stenosis and Calcification of Aortic Valve.

Authors:  Kimi Sato; Arnav Kumar; Yash Jobanputra; Jorge Betancor; Mohamed Halane; Robin George; Vivek Menon; Amar Krishnaswamy; E Murat Tuzcu; Serge Harb; Wael A Jaber; Stephanie Mick; Lars G Svensson; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Impact of aortic valve calcification severity on device success after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Jeremy Larroche; Loïc Panh; Thibault Lhermusier; Vincent Bataille; Marie-Agnès Marachet; Thomas Chollet; Antoine Petermann; Frederic Bouisset; Nicolas Boudou; Bertrand Marcheix; Hervé Rousseau; Michel Galinier; Didier Carrié; Olivier Lairez; Yoan Lavie-Badie
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Multimodality Imaging for Discordant Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Assessing the Valve and the Myocardium.

Authors:  Ezequiel Guzzetti; Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Philippe Pibarot; Marie-Annick Clavel
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-12-03

4.  Does Aortic Valve Calcium Score Still Predict Death, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Conductive Disturbances after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with New-Generation Prostheses?

Authors:  Alexandre Gamet; Adeline Chatelin; Jean Mergy; Pauline Bécat; Pierre Roumegou; Luc Christiaens
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2020-08-17

Review 5.  Models and Techniques to Study Aortic Valve Calcification in Vitro, ex Vivo and in Vivo. An Overview.

Authors:  Maria Bogdanova; Arsenii Zabirnyk; Anna Malashicheva; Daria Semenova; John-Peder Escobar Kvitting; Mari-Liis Kaljusto; Maria Del Mar Perez; Anna Kostareva; Kåre-Olav Stensløkken; Gareth J Sullivan; Arkady Rutkovskiy; Jarle Vaage
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.988

6.  Aortic valve calcium volume as measured by native versus contrast-enhanced computer tomography and the implications for the diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis in TAVR patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Mohammad El Garhy; Tamer Owais; Philipp Lauten
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2022-09-30

7.  Estimation of Aortic Valve Calcium Score Based on Angiographic Phase Versus Reduction of Ionizing Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Paweł Gać; Bartłomiej Kędzierski; Piotr Macek; Krystyna Pawlas; Rafał Poręba
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-23

8.  Optimal Attenuation Threshold for Quantifying CT Pulmonary Vascular Volume Ratio.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo; Sang Hyub Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.500

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.