Literature DB >> 28456908

Use of prophylactic growth factors and antimicrobials in elderly patients with cancer: a review of the Medicare database.

Romina Sosa1, Shuling Li2, Julia T Molony2, Jiannong Liu2, Scott Stryker3, Allan J Collins4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Growth factors and antimicrobials can reduce complications of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. Their prophylactic use in elderly patients is important given the associated comorbidity in this age group. There is a developing trend by payers to include supportive care agents in chemotherapy care bundles, which could affect clinical practice. We examined whether the febrile neutropenia (FN) risk categories can be used to describe utilization in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid fee-for-service system in older adults.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Medicare 20% sample data to describe growth factor and antimicrobial use patterns in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer, lung cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
RESULTS: The highest percentage of patients receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) within the first 5 days of a chemotherapy cycle were on high-FN-risk regimens, particularly for cycle 1 (73.7%, breast cancer; 61.5%, NHL) and cycle 2 (75.9%, breast cancer; 77.5%, NHL). Chemotherapy regimens for lung cancer are less myelotoxic, and growth factor use was more likely with latter cycles. Antibiotic use was lower at 15% within a cycle and appeared to be in response to complications.
CONCLUSION: Practitioners use GCSF and antibiotics for elderly patients treated with potentially toxic chemotherapy, while comorbidity burden plays a role for patients treated with less myelotoxic regimens. The complexity of these choices in clinical practice should be considered in the proposed reimbursement changes being piloted by Medicare and private insurance companies seeking treatment cost reductions, as altered use could affect safety and efficacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobials; Chemotherapy; Febrile neutropenia; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28456908     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3720-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  20 in total

Review 1.  Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america.

Authors:  Alison G Freifeld; Eric J Bow; Kent A Sepkowitz; Michael J Boeckh; James I Ito; Craig A Mullen; Issam I Raad; Kenneth V Rolston; Jo-Anne H Young; John R Wingard
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Toxicity and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (TAC) or 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC): impact of adding primary prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to the TAC regimen.

Authors:  M Martín; A Lluch; M A Seguí; A Ruiz; M Ramos; E Adrover; A Rodríguez-Lescure; R Grosse; L Calvo; C Fernandez-Chacón; M Roset; A Antón; D Isla; P Martínez del Prado; L Iglesias; J Zaluski; A Arcusa; J M López-Vega; M Muñoz; J R Mel
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  History of chronic comorbidity and risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients not receiving G-CSF prophylaxis.

Authors:  C Chao; J H Page; S-J Yang; R Rodriguez; J Huynh; V M Chia
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis during the first two cycles only or throughout all chemotherapy cycles in patients with breast cancer at risk for febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Maureen J Aarts; Frank P Peters; Caroline M Mandigers; M Wouter Dercksen; Jacqueline M Stouthard; Hans J Nortier; Hanneke W van Laarhoven; Laurence J van Warmerdam; Agnes J van de Wouw; Esther M Jacobs; Vera Mattijssen; Carin C van der Rijt; Tineke J Smilde; Annette W van der Velden; Mehmet Temizkan; Erdogan Batman; Erik W Muller; Saskia M van Gastel; George F Borm; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Pegfilgrastim +/- ciprofloxacin for primary prophylaxis with TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer. Results from the GEPARTRIO study.

Authors:  G von Minckwitz; S Kümmel; A du Bois; W Eiermann; H Eidtmann; B Gerber; J Hilfrich; J Huober; S D Costa; C Jackisch; S-T Grasshoff; S Vescia; T Skacel; S Loibl; K M Mehta; M Kaufmann
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Technical evaluation of methods for identifying chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in healthcare claims databases.

Authors:  Derek Weycker; Oleg Sofrygin; Kim Seefeld; Robert G Deeter; Jason Legg; John Edelsberg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pegfilgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in elderly patients with hematological malignancies-bendamustine and G-CSF support.

Authors:  Claudio Cerchione; Amalia De Renzo; Davide Nappi; Maria Di Perna; Roberta Della Pepa; Novella Pugliese; Lucio Catalano; Fabrizio Pane; Marco Picardi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices.

Authors:  Robert M Rifkin; Jeffrey Crawford; Reshma L Mahtani; David C Dale; Mohit Narang; William W MacLaughlin; Chanh Huynh; Prasad L Gawade; Sandra Lewis; Lucy DeCosta; Tatiana Lawrence; Rajesh Belani
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Patterns of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Prasad L Gawade; Shuling Li; David Henry; Nancy Smith; Rajesh Belani; Michael A Kelsh; Brian D Bradbury
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Trends in Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Following Introduction of Biosimilars Among Adults With Cancer and Commercial or Medicare Insurance From 2014 to 2019.

Authors:  Ching-Yu Wang; Coy D Heldermon; Scott M Vouri; Haesuk Park; Sarah E Wheeler; Brian Hemendra Ramnaraign; Nam Hoang Dang; Joshua D Brown
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.